RUSSIANS, GLOBALISM, AND THE DNC RUNNING OUT OF IDEAS!

By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and Friends of America!
RUSSIANS, GLOBALISM, AND THE DNC RUNNING OUT OF IDEAS!

Russians Come Forward with BOMB, They Met with Hillary Aides During Campaign!

Liberals and media have been pushing the alleged Trump-Russian collusion talking points now for months.

But Russians met with Hillary Clinton aides during the election as well! 

So where is the attention to that?

From The Hill:

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman said in an interview Sunday that the Russian ambassador who met with Trump campaign officials also met with “people working in think tanks advising Hillary or advising people working for Hillary.”

“Well, if you look at some people connected with Hillary Clinton during her campaign, you would probably see that he had lots of meetings of that kind,” Dmitry Peskov told CNN “GPS” host Fareed Zakaria. “There are lots of specialists in politology, people working in think tanks advising Hillary or advising people working for Hillary.”

According to Peskov, none of the meetings was about interfering in the elections, but that it was the job of the Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak to talk about “bilateral relations” with both sides of the political aisle.

Peskov said that Vladimir Putin had never publicly expressed a preference during the election for either of the candidates.

“If you ask him whether he had mentioned the then-candidate Donald Trump, I will answer, yes, he had.”

Peskov suggested that the Kremlin leader found Clinton hostile toward Russia, while Trump was open to thawing U.S.-Russian relations.

“The candidate Hillary Clinton was quite negative about our country in her attitude and in her program, declaring Russia being nearly the main evil in the world and the main threat for the United States,” Peskov said.

So both Trump and Clinton aides met with Russians but somehow only the Trump people are in the wrong for doing so?

While the Trump team hasn’t been found to have had any abnormal interactions with the Russians as of yet, the Hillary side certainly did.

One person with whom Russians were most definitely meeting last year was Tony Podesta, the brother of John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager. Podesta didn’t register as a foreign agent as he was required to while acting on behalf of a Kremlin-connected Russian bank to lobby against U.S. sanctions. 

So the brother and former lobbying partner of the Clinton campaign manager is a Russian agent? Arguing against U.S. sanctions?

Democrats attacked Mike Flynn for mentioning sanctions in a conversation, although having no discussion about changing them.

Hypocrisy, they name is Democrats… So. Where’s the beef?

‘REASONS TO VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS’ BOOK IS JUST EMPTY PAGES, AND #1 ON AMAZON BEST SELLER LIST, AND THEN THE DEMS CAME OUT WITH A COPY CAT, AGAIN, NO NEW IDEAS?

To quote an excerpt from author Michael J. Knowles’ new book, the main reason to vote for a Democrat is “        .”

The above is not a typo.

Knowles’ tome, “Reasons to Vote for Democrats: A Comprehensive Guide,” is 266 pages of absolutely nothing. Clean, blank, snow-white pages. And as of Friday morning, it occupied the No. 1 slot on Amazon.com's "Best Sellers" list.

“What’s really great about this book, you can go cover-to-cover in about 15, 20 seconds,” Knowles’ told “Fox & Friends” on Thursday.

Billed as “the most exhaustively researched and coherently argued Democrat Party apologia to date,” the spoof book was Knowles' attempt to razz the party for a lack of direction. The conservative journalist released it last month and the book was listed at $9.99 on Amazon -- but you can pick up a paperback on sale for $7.08.

The project does, curiously, contain an extensive bibliography and a table of contents. But nothing else.

“It took a very long time to research this book,” Knowles said Thursday. “I’ve been observing the Democratic Party for at least 10 years now and when I observed their record and reasons to vote for them – on reasons of economics or foreign policy or homeland security or civil rights and so on – I realized it was probably best to just leave all the pages blank.”

A chapter on civil rights? Blank. Values? Nothing there.

“When I started researching the book and going through this exhaustive study process, at first I turned to the 2012 Democratic National Convention, and it turned out they were deciding whether or not to include God in their party platform,” Knowles said. “And the Democrats booed God. That’s not good. So I decided probably if I’m going to make a good case to vote for Democrats, probably just leave that chapter blank.”

Or maybe the pages are just supposed to be filled with the thoughts in the reader's head? John Cage would like that. ~~By  Cody Derespina

America seems to have awoken to the true facts and outrageous lies of the Obama administration and the corruptness that came with it. For the first time in history Americans are having to deal with a negative influence on the basic rights of individualism and mutual ideas because ‘Agenda Journalists’ are attempting, through political correctness, to steer the talking points and false narrative to an anarchist’s style of not following the rule of law or the rights granted to every individual legal citizen in America, and outlined in the Bill of Rights!
Freedom of Speech, Press, Religion and Petition 

'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.'

So, now the American people have to deal with protestors/activists/anarchists that are becoming more of a parasite than a cancer! they are using the 1st Amendment to hide behind while these pro-violence activists latch on to other nonviolent movements and use the cover of a large human shield to carry out actions that the large nonviolent gathering wants no part of and did not sanction. It puts their personal safety at risk without their consent, and each time they succeeded in starting trouble it provokes the police to crack down and twisting the meaning of the protest into one of incoherent rioting.

George Soros funded anarchists do not organize these events, but rather show up with a mindset to riot. This cowardly and fraudulent activity paints the entire movement as violent and thuggish, when it is nothing of the sort. If anarchist’s types had any sense of integrity or courage, they would arrange their own protests apart and distinct from other movements and face the authorities on their own without the benefit of placing others in harm's way to shield themselves from the full brunt of police response. But they don't do that, of course. That is their clear moral failing and/or sign of police provocateur activity.

Current law could classify this behavior as "terrorism," with some justification. Assaulting people with rebar or concrete for a supposed political purpose is indeed violence with a political motive. Anarchists, or some unknown provocateur elements, have successfully turned a massive peaceful political protest into police riots, changes the news story, erases the messages of thousands of committed activists, and scares a lot of well-meaning, nonviolent people from returning to protest in the future.

Provoking a police crackdown has the effect of scaring regular people into staying home. Images of smashed property or burning police cars have the effect of turning middle-of-the-road populations against the goals of a movement. It disgraces movements and denies them further influx of new supporters. It is the preferred method of crushing opposition movements by repressive states. So, whose side are these people on?

A tactic as opposed to a movement, let's make the finer distinctions of what the argument means without semantic chicanery. The "Occupy Movement" (like many other movements before them) has declared itself to be nonviolent. It may not be "the 99 percent" in fact, but it is certainly a social justice movement that embraces nonviolent tactics exclusively. Those who would change this fact have not been able to achieve power in the movement, and they have not achieved any change in this fundamental condition. If pro-violent extremists wish to pursue their own actions, then it is their responsibility to do so without involving an unwilling group of peaceful activists to hide behind.

Continuing down this path where small violent elements can "poison the well" and create a toxic movement meme is a losing strategy. The public will not follow. The people will not side with those whose idea of 1st-amendment-protected protest is to hurl rebar and chunks of concrete at the police.

In short, people's movements need security of their own. They need sizable, equipped and trained teams to respond to any violence or vandalism the moment it happens. They need whistles, pepper spray, plastic handcuffs, and a standing arrangement with police to hand over vandals and criminals caught in the act. Masked rioters would be detained by movement security, unmasked, photographed and delivered swiftly to the waiting arms of police officers. The survival of the movement requires it. The safety of the innocent, nonviolent demonstrators demands it. ~~ With the help of Joe Giambrone, a Friend of America!

Barack Obama left office. He will be honored as a great man. But he is also likely to be quickly discarded by his former left-wing Progressive allies. Why? Because there is only one thing that leftists are interested in: power. Obama will shortly cease to have any political power. This is the only thing that leftists have ever respected, a paradigm that stretches all the way back to the French Revolution.

They will pay lip service to Obama as a great and wonderful man. Of course, he was neither. He was a self-important fool. But they cannot admit that. Leftists must justify to themselves the Obama fever they experienced in 2008. “I wore his t-shirt and treated him like the 2nd coming of Jesus Christ, so he couldn’t have been that bad.”

I will say this: He was far better than George Bush. I’ll take Obama over Bush any day. Bush Jr. gave us two failed wars, the 2003 Prescription Drug bill (opened the door to the monstrosity of Obamacare), the TARP bailouts, approval of the FED policy that led to the housing bubble, and the subsequent encouragement of government “stimulus” when the bubble popped. In short, Bush got things done, which was not a good thing.

Obama, on the other hand, has always been a glorified sock puppet with Nancy Pelosi’s hand shoved far into his nether regions. She was Obama’s bulldog. It was Nancy Pelosi, not Obama, who had been sitting on the Obamacare bill for years. She bodes her time until Obama took office. She shoved the bill through Congress in 2009, not Obama. This was her finest hour:

Then, the bill passed. Pelosi got hers. Meanwhile, what did Obama get? Answer: His name stuck to a bill that will continue causing skyrocketing healthcare costs across the board for as long as it remains in effect. His legacy will forever be three things: being the first black President, Obamacare, and “If you like your healthcare, you can keep it.”

Click here>   FROM THE MOUTH OF AN IDIOT! 

When the Obamacare debacle was over and Pelosi retreated back into her cave, what was his next accomplishment? None. He had no other glorious achievements. He could not pass any comprehensive gun-control legislation. He could not pass any comprehensive environmental legislation. He had no significant illegal immigration amnesty bills.

In short, he was a bozo. Without Pelosi’s hand, up his rear, he had no backbone to accomplish anything. I consider this a great quality for a president: “no backbone to accomplish anything.” If we cannot have a president, like Ron Paul, who is going to work actively to roll back the State, repeal regulations, and lower both spending and taxes, then I would like to have a president who is at least too inept to significantly expand the State, regulations, or spending/taxation. Obama fell into this category.

And now, his legacy has been rejected. Hillary was his appointed successor. She was undoubtedly the anointed of the globalist elites, both Democrat and Republican, foreign and domestic. But she was beaten by a strange orange life-form with permanently puckered lips. The Media and globalist elites are desperate to pin this on the magical “R” word used to describe everything they don’t like. But even famous uber-liberal Michael Moore understands that racism had nothing to with it, and that it had everything to do with the failures of the Obama presidency.

CRACKING OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER!

2016 was a bad year for internationalist elites across the world. The bellwether for this was Poland’s historic parliamentary election at the end of 2015: the 100% domination of the election by right-wing nationalist parties. Not a single pro-EU leftist was elected to the Polish parliament. This was a sign of tectonic movement in voter sentiments.

Then, in America, we had Trump edge out Jeb Bush. This was a real shocker. The election was supposed to be Bush vs. Clinton… again. This was the will of the globalist elites. But Trump had something that neither of them had: grassroots support. People believed in him. This was what eventually most set Trump apart from Hillary: most of his voters chose him because they believed. Most of Hillary’s voters chose her simply because they did not like Trump. It was a rerun of the 2008 election with the political parties reversed.

Then, in June, Brexit. This was the biggest punch in the face yet to the globalist elites. It was the first major public message to be sent by voters: “We are getting sick of the international political order.”

Then, Trump was elected. It was a major surprise. I did not think he would win. I had actually hoped he would not win, but that is another story. The point is, this was a major democratic coup and a resounding wake-up call to the elites. Too little, too late.

This was followed by more anti-globalist happenings. The Italian referendum was a further rejection of the EU by Italians. French nationalist Marine Le Pen surged in the polls at the end of the year – a candidate who has promised a Brexit-style referendum if elected. Then, Bashar Al-Assad began to turn back the ISIS onslaught in Syria with the help of the Russian Government; this was in direct contradiction to the will of the Internationalist elites, who wanted to replace Assad with a puppet government of their own. But he has not given up.

It’s obvious what is happening: the internationalist elites of the West are reaching their limit. They are losing the ability to control both what happens overseas and at home. They are surely losing the ability to tax and spend endlessly, which will become crystal clear in the next recession.

After the Brexit vote, I wrote an article discussing the economics of power. In it, I said this:

…Power is not unlimited. It takes time and effort to cultivate. Then, it has to be allocated. When and where should you exercise power? Against whom? For what reasons? Like everything else in this world, power is scarce. It’s use has to be measured wisely.

Power is spinning out of the globalists’ control. They tried to push people around for too long, and now they face a two-fold problem: voters are not cooperating, and domestic economies not cooperating. Add in a third problem: Islamic jihadists are not cooperating. The globalist elites are increasingly finding that they command “Jump!” but nobody asks “How high?” Just the opposite: people are planting their feet firmly into the ground with an angry and resentful stare. The globalist elites are running out of time.

CONCLUSION

At the World, Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland – “where the elite meet to eat” – Vice President Joe Biden gave a farewell speech of sheer and utter bloviating. Almost entirely hot air. Just Biden being Biden. But there were interesting nuggets to take away. He warns against “political small-mindedness”. He warns against Iran, China, and Russia as “trying to collapse the liberal international order.” He warns against the collapse of internationalism in Europe.

But what solutions does he offer? What specifics action steps does he outline which internationalist organizations and pro-globalist governments can take to fight back against nationalism and populism? None. He offers zero practical advice. This is because he has none. He doesn’t know what to do. None of the elites know what to do. They can see the columns of their temple collapsing as angry masses of voters throw their weight into them, and they have zero clue on how to respond to it.

You know what Biden is? One of those disheveled bums who walk around the city wearing a sandwich board that says “THE END IS NIGH!” They certainly have a message of great warning and alarm for us. But try asking them how to fix the problem and see how that works out for you. ~~By THOMÉ REVIEW, a Friend of America!

Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , Tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
Friends of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.

WE THE PEOPLE

TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! 

Join The Resistance and Share This Article Now!