Wednesday, March 1, 2017

'AMERICA FIRST' DOESN'T RESONATE WITH THE 'PROGRESSIVE' LEFT,... WHY?

By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and Friends of America!
'AMERICA FIRST' DOESN'T RESONATE WITH THE 'PROGRESSIVE' LEFT,... WHY?
Trump’s invitation to the Progressive 'left' to join hands to work together as one for the American people to fix health care, and abandon the Obama continuation of the Socialist transformation of America, through division and deception, that the ice between the 2 parties would start to melt, but as these progressives sat on their hands, and sat on their hands when Trump attempted to bring up issues that even the left supports failed, I knew that it wasn’t going to be a good night!
Pelosi: I'm 'Proud' of Democrats' Decorum Last Night
On Tuesday night, as President Trump addressed Congress for the first time, Democrats hissed, booed, groaned, gave him the thumbs down, and refused to stand during his remarks - even when he was honoring our American soldiers.
That makes House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi's assessment of her colleagues' behavior quite puzzling.
“I was very proud of the dignity with which our members listened to his speech,” Pelosi said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” on Wednesday. “It was clearly a bait-and-switch speech.”
As Trump launched an assault on public education, immigration and the like, Democrats sat with "dignity," she noted.
No they didn't - and we have the footage to prove it.
Pelosi refuses to acknowledge the disgraceful behavior of her colleagues, but nothing changes the fact that Democrats remained seated as Trump asked them to recognize our soldiers and law enforcement, or that Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Keith Ellison made no apparent effort to recognize Carryn Owens, widow of fallen Navy SEAL William Ryan Owens.
Democrats used racism, to defend our first black President's response to criticism, and then Hillary Clinton said that half of Donald Trump’s American citizen supporters came from what she called a “basket of deplorables…. racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic” then said I don’t doubt that many of the Donald’s backers are terrible, racist, nativist, and misogynist people! Hillary’s Podesta then went on to portray Conservative Catholicism members of America’s religious communities as a “bastardization of the faith” and seemed to imply that Evangelicals are a bunch of impoverished country bumpkins! Did anyone notice that Hillary never mentioned the word ‘Americans’ who have the 1st amendment right to believe in whatever they want? I’m beginning to think this is why 'crooked' Hillary believes that there is room in the constitution for regulation when it comes to the 1st and 2nd Amendment, and that her shit doesn't stink! 

President Trump’s first speech to the joint members of congress was all about an optimistic vision for the future of America, and then went into what he's already started to do to fulfill his campaign promises! President Trump by the way did it all without the obstructionist Progressive left's fast tracking Trump's cabinet nominees needed to assist in helping make America great again! It has become very clear to me now that the disdain for America, our constitution, and the ‘Will’ of the American people will continue to be targeted by the new leadership of the DNC, House minority leader Nancy Pelosi, and Senate minority leader, Chuck-e Schumer!
After President Trump’s speech to the joint members of Congress last night those 10 out of 23 Democratic Senate seats that are up for grabs in the 2018 midterms are in pretty bad shape, especially when Trump won in a big way in those same 10 states! The New Democratic members of congress shouldn’t forget that Pelosi and Schumer are Democratic career politicians that attempted to sell out our founding fathers Constitutional Republic for Socialism, and that they will go down with the Obama/Hillary ship no matter what the innocent collateral damage is to the party of ‘nothing new.’ 

President Trump is a RINO (Republican in name only) because he had to be part of the establishment's bipartisan garden party to be President of the United States! He leans right but leans more towards the ‘Will of the American people and sees the positives and negatives on both sides of the aisle. The Republican Party accepted the results and adjusting, but the Democratic Party has been taken over by the Progressive left and will never surrender their Socialist policies and agenda to undermine our constitution!
The two-party system’s rules and regulation have run our political selection process for generations, and should show all Americans how corrupt the process truly is! Did you know that there is no mention of political parties in the Constitutional? Did you know that the system has been financed by outside interests and ideologues like George Soros, who have sinister plans for the world and the world order through globalism, open borders, and financing the plan through taxpayer’s dollars before what’s in the best interest for the American people, and keeping America safe!
This morning I’m hearing from the critics of the left about how the widow of Ryan Owens, one of our heroes that was killed a month ago, in the line of duty while retrieving important intel need to assist in the downfall of ISIS, was only a ‘token’ gesture, that the Dem’s felt didn’t need to be applauded, stood up for, or even recognized, and then shortly after walking out quickly after the speech!  How quickly they forgot about the Democratic convention and their more than obvious ‘agenda driven’ paid tokens that they either spoke about or physically displayed in front of the world: 
TOKEN GOLD STAR FATHER: KHIZR KHAN! (Because he’s a Muslim Gold Star father)
Clinton Cash: Khizr Khan’s Deep Legal, Financial Connections to Saudi Arabia, Hillary’s Clinton Foundation Tie Terror, Immigration, Email Scandals Together!
Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that the mainstream media and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been using to criticize Donald J. Trump, has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia—and to international Islamist investors through his own law firm. In addition to those ties to the wealthy Islamist nation, Khan also has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States—and has deep ties to the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation!
TOKEN LIBERAL MEXICAN FEDERAL JUDGE: GONZALO CURIEL! (Because he’s a Mexican)
Trump is the poster boy for securing our borders and building a wall along our southern border. Judge Curiel may or may not have a personal issue with Trump’s goals of securing our border; we can’t tell. But Curiel’s association with La Raza suggests that he probably does. And if that is the case, that is a major conflict of interest.
It comes to light from LawNewz that the law firm Robbins Geller appointed by Judge Gonzalo Curiel to represent a plaintiff in the Trump University class action suits has another connection to Hillary Clinton beyond a $2700 campaign contribution from firm chairman Darren Robbins. LawNewz did not mention the firm’s connection to the Trump University case. The information was apparently retrieved from a Washington Post data base with the Clinton financial filings on file. (The Post itself has not reported on this connection.)
It seems that Robbins Geller “paid the Clintons nearly half a million dollars in less than a year.” Why? Speeches of course.
That’s right. One of the law firms picked by the Judge in the Trump University case — the very Judge Donald Trump accuses by name of anti-Trump bias — awarded this firm the case after — say again after — Hillary and Bill Clinton had been paid a cool $450,000 for two speeches by the firm.
In the meantime, it would behoove Republican leadership to stop slandering Trump over this issue. Democrats consistently win elections because they’ve learned to never criticize their own.
WHAT, WE CAN’T COME TOGETHER AGAIN LIKE WE DID WHEN ALL AMERICANS FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE DROPPED WHAT THEY WERE DOING TO ANSWER THE CALL WHEN THE JAPANESE ATTACKED PEARL HARBOR ON DECEMBER 7, 1941? ~~
Whose Side Are You On?
It was President Trump without the affect. That’s how Fox News’s Tucker Carlson described Trump’s first address to Congress last night. It was populist, but we all know Trump is a right-leaning member of that political persuasion. There wasn’t much that was necessarily radical, except for the Obamacare portion, but we all know both Republicans and Democrats disagree on that issue.
Carlson said that the net effect of the speech was to diminish the Democrats in the room.
“They didn’t greet him when he walked in, they didn’t applaud when he said we’re going to put American interests first, they groaned when he brought up the victims of immigrant crime, raising the obvious question whose side are you on exactly,” he said.
Tucker added that the Democrats didn’t do themselves any favors by showing the total war mindset they’re adopting when it comes to the Trump White House. The Fox News host added that what would they do if the president has a larger, more extensive infrastructure plan. There is nothing wrong with total resistance if the man you’re resisting is reprehensible. There was nothing in Trump’s speech that qualified for such a cold reception. ~~By Matt Vespa, a Friend of America!
Democratic 'Women in White' Remain Seated As Trump Asks Congress to Honor Our Soldiers
President Trump spent several moments during his address to the joint session of Congress on Tuesday honoring the bravest among us: our soldiers. Upon the mention of our military, the entire room--Republican and Democrat--were on their feet. Well, almost everyone.
Unbelievably, a handful of Democratic women who had dressed in white (for reasons hard to understand) to protest the president, remained seated at the mention of our soldiers.You would think supporting our military would be a bipartisan issue.
Shortly after that, Trump recognized fallen Navy SEAL William "Ryan" Owens, who died in a raid on an al Qaeda compound in Yemen in January. His widow, Carryn Owens, was one of Trump's special guests tonight, sitting right beside his daughter Ivanka. What followed was a beautiful tribute to her brave husband. Throughout the president's remarks, Mrs. Owens glanced to the sky and let her tears fall. It was one of the most emotional moments ever to occur at a joint session of Congress.
It really exposed the contrast of the moment. Dana Loesch said it best:
  Dana Loesch
  ‎@DLoesch 
All you women in white — you better get a look at Carryn Owens. That’s the face of strength. #Jointsession
9:59 PM - 28 Feb 2017 ~~By Cortney O'Brien, a Friend of America!
Krauthammer: The Damage the Democratic Party Has Suffered Under Obama Is 'Incalculable'
Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer said President Obama is being “semi-delusional” when he says that the results of the 2016 election don’t matter much and that Democrats just lost one election.
“The damage his party has suffered in his eight years in office is incalculable,” he said. “The reason that when people talk about who is going to run in 2020, they’re all octogenarians or nearly because the bench has been wiped out. There has been a prairie fire.”
Yes, Obama himself has been popular, Krauthammer acknowledged, but he “overreached as a liberal.”
“With Obama care, with cap and trade, with all of the regulations, and he had a very slow recovery. He thinks that he succeeded, the country doesn’t. Obama himself said in 2010 and 2014 and then 16 “I’m not on the ballot but my policy, my legacy is.” That’s exactly what happened and his legacy was rejected. And I don’t think he understands that.” ~~By Leah Barkoukis, a Friend of America!
Four big takeaways (and four shocking surprises) from Trump's speech
Maybe I have baseball on the brain, but when I watch President Trump what I’ve seen to date is one fastball after another.
For nearly nine months now, Trump has thrown at one speed – hard, high and inside. His candidacy: hardly nuanced. His presidency: as subtle as a wrecking ball.
This was one of several unresolved questions going into Tuesday night’s joint address to Congress: could Trump deviate from the rhetorical heat that proved effective as a candidate to a president capable of mixing speeds (rhetorically, at least) and keeping Democratic batters off-balance and behind in the count?
The answer: yes, he can.
Trump’s address -- he billed it as “a renewal of the American spirit,” calling on Congress to join him “in dreaming big, and bold and daring things for our country” -- weaved in and out of familiar places. But with the occasional surprise detour – the sort of focus-group approach that made Bill Clinton’s speeches before Congress so long (Trump spoke for an hour) but politically effective.
Now that Trump has lent his voice to policy choices, he has a choice. He can sit back and trust Speaker Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to do the driving. Or, he can work with the congressional leadership to keep the flock from straying.
Democrats were forced to take notice of Trump’s call for paid family leave, just as Republicans couldn’t ignore a stronger-than-usual call for school choice.
Trump constantly repeated to a higher ground of bipartisanship and national pride, be it rebuilding at home or reengaging overseas.
The effectiveness of it all? I’ll wager that it tested well with voters willing to put aside the man’s personality and listen to his ideas.
Several hours before Trump’s address, I attended a lunch where House Speaker Paul spoke briefly. Ryan outlined a prestissimo tempo on Capitol Hill this spring: budgeting, tax reform, salvaging the health care train wreck. Another baseball metaphor comes to mind: The House pitching, the Senate catching.
And President Trump?
Starting with Tuesday night’s address, if he wants his agenda – or a reasonable portion of it in the first two years – he’ll have to learn how to manage a squad of congressional Republicans with self-defeating tendencies.
Here are four takeaways from Trump’s speech:
1. How Trump Stated the Union’s State. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama entered office amidst rocky economies. George W. Bush came to Washington needing to prove his legitimacy after losing the popular vote and a prolonged legal challenge.
For Trump, it’s a little from column A, a lot from column B. The economy’s a mixed message: stocks have never been higher; Target, the epitome of Main Street America, is struggling thanks to the digital monster that is Amazon. Meanwhile, congressional Democrats refuse to grant Trump presidential stature.
Despite the White House’s pre-speech insistence, the night was all about optimism, this wasn’t an address containing Obama-level saccharine (after a fiery convention speech and an ominous-sounding inaugural, were you surprised?).
In a realigned Washington, a Republican president now touts victimhood (bad trade deals stealing American jobs; illegal aliens preying on lawful citizens). Congressional Democrats bemoan government over-reach in the form of Obamacare stepped-up immigration enforcement.
Throughout the evening, Trump didn’t go off on a tangent. Congressional Democrats sat stonily. Nowadays, that passes for a good evening in the nation’s capital.
2. The State of Trump’s State. The 45th president entered his first joint address to Congress with a 39 percent approval rating, per the Fox News Poll (Obama was at 60 percent at the same point in 2009).
The good news: it’s worlds better than Congress’ 17 percent approval in the same poll. The bad news: it’s not the best of leveraging positions.
What does work for Trump is the novelty of his appearing in prime-time television (as a politician, that is) working off a Teleprompter and having an adult conversation with the American public. Unlike the a.m. version of Trump – the one prone to manic tweeting and extemporaneous remarks at press avails that set off dumpster fires – the p.m. version is less abrasive and makes a more convincing case that he’s serious about the job and has a lot of ideas that makes sense.
It may be asking too much to ask Trump to give up the stream-of-consciousness tweeting for Lent.
What he should consider: more speeches like this and town hall venues outside the beltway, where the presidential agenda has far more resonance – with Democrats representing districts that didn’t vote for Hillary Clinton in a tough spot.
3. Reality Check. Trump was expected to talk at length about ObamaCare repeal, in part to defang criticism about Medicaid cuts crippling state budgets and the currently insured set adrift (another Trump peace-offering to Democrats: pre-existing conditions still get coverage).
The surprises:
-- Just hours after the White House hinted it’s open to a deal on immigration reform, Trump talked about immigration through the context of drug-smuggling, the border wall and controlled entry into the U.S. There was no mention of DREAM-ers or dealing with sanctuary cities.
-- Trump’s call for bipartisanship included fair trade and a new “border tax” – not “drain the swamp” reforms such as lobbying restrictions that were mentioned earlier in the address (and met with Democratic sarcasm).
-- Trump’s highlighting Pompe Disease survivor Megan Crowley was a reminder of this president’s populist instincts, just as the prolonged applause for Navy widow Carryn Owen was Reagan-level poignancy? Want to unite voters? Point out the high cost of medicine and the FDA’s burdensome process, or one family’s sacrifice to its country.
-- While the economy got large play, the specifics of tax reform didn’t. The president made a vague reference to reducing for businesses and families, but didn’t give it the same play as infrastructure investment or regulatory reform. One imagines that Wall Street was hoping for more.
4. Can Anyone Play This Game? It’s the question Casey Stengel once asked while pondering the expansion New York Mets of 1962 infamy. Dealt an inside straight in this election – control of two branches of government; an opposition party long on dissent but short on substance – can the GOP capitalize on its good fortune?
It’s been almost 1,000 hours since Barack Obama left office. To the extent, the left has complained about the former president, it would be: despite talking a big game (climate change, gun control) he didn’t engage with Congress on a personal level to win over lawmakers.
Now that Trump has lent his voice to policy choices, he has a choice. He can sit back and trust Speaker Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to do the driving. Or, he can work with the congressional leadership to keep the flock from straying.
This isn’t to suggest that Trump should rent a copy of HBO’s “All The Way” and mimic Lyndon Johnson’s handholding and arm-twisting. But perhaps it’s time to shift gears and push for the agenda in the same struggling economic pockets that made the politically impossible last fall.
On a night when nothing historically lasting was uttered, it’s how this president will be judged: by results, not fancy words or extended olive branches.
With the current threat of Facebook's feckless ability to be bipartisan, feel free to befriend me at 'Jonathan E P Moore' to get direct and instant access, or follow 'While You Were Sleeping' at www.whileyouweredozing.blogspot.com Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Google Plus, and PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
🚂🇺������💨

Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.

No comments:

Post a Comment