JAMES COMEY HIDES BEHIND FACTS BEING CLASSIFED TO CONCEAL THE TRUTH!

By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and Friends of America! 
JAMES COMEY HIDES BEHIND FACTS BEING CLASSIFED TO CONCEAL THE TRUTH! 

The Progressive left has run Comey up their flag pole again, and the American people should be outraged by the semantics of this ‘Hillary’ henchman. I watched, or should say listened to Comey’s carefully chosen words, and he was very careful about always saying there is no proof that “Trump Tower” was wiretapped by former President Obama, and used classified on everything else he couldn't answer, So, I guess the inference here is if not at ‘Trump Tower,’ then where, and from whom was this information hatched? ….. Hmmm, I guess only time will tell?

How funny is it that the Hillary campaign was hacked and that’s because the cyber security anti-hacking software was never updated in the DNC, and their fault, while the GOP’s was? How is it that Hillary’s unsecured illegal server which was hacked, and what seems to be a microcosm of the DNC's problem, and according to Comey, 5 times by entities outside the insiders of Hillary’s campaign and the DNC? How is it possible that the DNC isn’t responsible for any of the supposed facts related to the Russians affecting the election? Why isn’t the obvious George Soros being investigated when it comes to interfering with the 2016 elections? Why did Comey start an investigation into the Trump Presidential campaign Russian influence before the election by more than 4 months? Just knowing those facts should tell you that it was the 17 intelligence agencies working on this investigation that were attempting to influence the election way before the Russians came on the scene in the 2016 election cycle!  

Where is the outcry when John Podesta along with Hillary, who basically brokered a deal with Russia to give up 20% of America’s Uranium, that resulted in a donation to the Clinton Foundation of some $130+ Million dollars, ended up with Russia giving Uranium to Iran? What about Podesta, Hillary’s campaign manager who benefited through stock he owned in that same Uranium company that he transferred to his daughter? My point here is that there are more incidences that are more telling then President Trumps campaign when it comes to the Russians! Comey, when asked about Putin’s anger toward Hillary said that anyone who was running against Hillary would be the preferred choice of Putin, and not just Trump. If you need a little comparison so that you can understand how this works than know that I’m a NY Yankee and NY Giant fan, and I cheer for anyone that plays the Boston Red Sox and Dallas Cowboys. 

There’s no need to rehash everything that Obama and Hillary have done to undermine America’s exceptional standing in the world, and there’s no reason to keep bitching about the past 8 years under Obama’s reign of America to Socialism, but there is a reason to be optimistic about the future, and while one poll says that Trump’s popularity is at a new low at 38%, and another poll says his popularity is at a new high of 52%, people are feeling pretty good about the possibilities for the future that American people haven’t felt for a very long time, and when you see the travesty and waste of time and taxpayers money justifying the existence of 17 redundant security agencies who have no clue with what each other are doing, it’s nice to know that there is still 1 man who is still fighting for the American people and can see through the travesty of political correctness, interpretation and intent before enforcing the  rule of law, and following the Constitution, and that’s Trey Gowdy.

Trey Gowdy, in my opinion, always knocks it out of the park when called upon to investigate attempts to conceal corrupt political actions against the ‘Will’ of the American people and our Constitutional Republic, and if you’ve never seen him in action before you should, and you should take the time to watch this small, but revealing 5-minute clip of the end of his questioning of Comey yesterday: 

Click here>  TREY GOWDY'S PROFOUND INTERPRETATION OF OUR DOJ AND RULE OF LAW!

TREY GOWDY HAS EXPOSED THE HYPOCRISY OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE INFLUENCE BY RUSSIA OF THE 2016 ELECTION!

We can see that this investigation won’t take 8 days, like the FBI took to go through ‘all’ of Hillary’s emails, but will allow ‘Fake News’ to rear its ugly head thunder stealing headlines, accompanied by those credible ‘reliable sources’ every time President Trump accomplishes another item on his to-do list!

What’s driving me a little crazy is that the base of all these accusations come from the fact that the pre-election ‘Fake Polls’ had Hillary leading, and leading by a lot, while a lot of independent polls predicted a Trump victory, but what just came out yesterday was that investigation into the Russian influence connection started back in July before the election, and when all of these coincidences was perceive to be beneficial enough, the need to use voter fraud to get Obama elected in 2012 wouldn’t be needed because they already knew that the George Soros voting machines were, you remember, the same voting machines in Idaho that the rep who was leading the GOP primary election declared ‘fraud,’ and those same machines were now being used in 307 districts in 16 swing states on election day 2016! 

The goal here by the Progressive left is to get America back on board the Globalist, Socialist, and open border train, and to eliminate the exceptional status in the world of America, and they won’t stop pressing until all of George Soros funded organizations triumph over the ‘Will’ of the American people!

I hope that the left’s rage, because of the Hillary loss, continues to blind them to a point where the voter realizes that that’s not where they want America to go, or the lessons that their children should be learning, or being  any part of. I think you have to be asking yourself will Russiagate backfire on the Left? ~~

While the House Intelligence Committee focused on the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign’s Russian links–for which no solid evidence has been provided–former prosecutor Rep. Trey Gowdy honed in on the one crime we do know about. Someone leaked, or in intelligence-speak, “unmasked” Mike Flynn.

From Fox News:

"In a tense exchange, Gowdy, himself a former federal prosecutor, ticked off what sounded like his own short list of suspects. He asked which of former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch and ex-White House adviser Ben Rhodes could have known Flynn was caught on tape conferring with the Russian ambassador.

"Comey acknowledged all but Rhodes were privy to the information, the disclosing of which is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. Comey said he did not know if Rhodes had access to such information.

Bill O’Reilly, who I normally don’t link to, was smelling what Gowdy was stepping in. He even got a skeptical Charles Krauthammer to agree that the only felony we’ve seen so far for certain is whoever unmasked Flynn. But Krauthammer wasn’t so sure that the leakers would be identified, never mind caught. It took 40 years to reveal the Watergate leaker, he remarked.

He might be right. There’s a long, rich history of journalists talking to government leakers, exposing all manner of malfeasance and intrigue. But these days’ leakers don’t always connect with journalists–they throw stuff out on the Internet, or send it to Julian Assange’s anti-American Wikileaks.

Here’s the big problem Gowdy exposed today: Comey said he was authorized by the Justice Department to reveal the investigation into President Trump’s Russian connections. But he wasn’t authorized (or never asked) to reveal anything about investigations into Flynn’s leakers.

No crimes have been alleged and no evidence has been provided about the Trump campaign’s collusion or cooperation with Russians. A crime was absolutely committed by submarining Flynn, which also simultaneously fed into the speculation about Trump and Russia. One investigation, under the FBI’s counterintelligence portfolio, was disclosed publicly, under oath, to Congress. The other was filled with equivocation.

Comey’s selective disclosures didn’t do Trump any favors. He undermined Trump’s evidence-free stories about Obama “wiretaps,” including using GCHQ surveillance, exposing the president to accusations of “liar,” while keeping a cloud hovering over the White House. Fox News’ Intelligence Correspondent Catherine Herridge noted that counterintelligence investigations can take years.

The showdown between Gowdy and Comey might have been a friendly match of two lawyers, but it has serious implications. An administration under a cloud will have more problems getting things done, while Trump’s credibility will be more strained (if that’s possible).

This is shaping up to look like the plot of the 1987 Kevin Costner thriller “No Way Out,” only without the steamy limousine scenes and murder. There’s an “Ivan” somewhere in the government, leaking to the press. He or she definitely exists. There may or may not also be another “Ivan” leaking to the Russians.

Comey is going to have to disclose what he’s doing the find the known Ivan, while he continues to search for the unknown one. ~~ By Steve Berman, a Friend of America!

WILL LOYAL DEMOCRATS OF THE OLD GUARD LOOK FOR NEW ANSWERS AND LEADERSHIP TO BECOME RELEVANT AGAIN, AND WILL THE REST OF AMERICA USE  COMMON SENSE WHEN IT COMES TO THE ACCUSATIONS OF RUSSIA HAVING INFLUENCED OUR 2016 ELECTION?

 Click here>  IS COMMON SENSE LOGIC DEAD?

The big losers of the Russian hacking scandal may yet be those who invested all their capital in a script that turned out to be based on a fairy tale.

In Monday's Intelligence Committee hearings, James Comey did confirm that his FBI has found nothing to support President Trump's tweet that President Obama ordered him wiretapped. Not unexpected, but undeniably an embarrassment for the tweeter-in-chief.

Yet longer-term damage may have been done to the left. For Monday's hearing showed that its rendering of the campaign of 2016 may be a product of fiction and a fevered imagination.

After eight months investigating the hacking and leaking of the emails of Clinton campaign chief John Podesta and the DNC, there is apparently no evidence yet of Trump collusion with Russia.

Former Director of National Intelligence Gen. James Clapper has said that, as of his departure day, Jan. 20, he had seen no evidence of a Russia-Trump collusion.

Former acting CIA Director Michael Morell also made that clear this month: "On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire, at all. ... There's no little campfire, there's no little candle, there's no spark. And there's a lot of people looking for it." Morell was a surrogate for the Hillary Clinton campaign.

But while the FBI is still searching for a Trump connection, real crimes have been unearthed -- committed by anti-Trump bureaucrats colluding with mainstream media -- to damage Trump's presidency.

There is hard evidence of collusion between the intel community and The New York Times and The Washington Post, both beneficiaries of illegal leaks -- felonies punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

While the howls have been endless that Trump accused Obama of a "felony," the one provable felony here was the leak of a transcript of an intercepted conversation between Gen. Michael Flynn and the Russian ambassador.

That leak ended Flynn's career as national security adviser. And Director Comey would neither confirm nor deny that President Obama was aware of the existence of the Flynn transcript.

So where do we stand after yesterday's hearing and eight-month FBI investigation? The Russians did hack Podesta's email account and the DNC, and while the FBI has found no evidence of Trump campaign collusion with the Russians, it is still looking.

However, the known unknowns seem more significant!

How could DNI Director Clapper and CIA Director Morell say that no connection had been established between Trump's campaign and the Russians, without there having been an investigation? And how could such an investigation be conclusive in exonerating Trump's associates -- without some use of electronic surveillance?

Did the FBI fly to Moscow and question Putin's cyber warfare team?

More questions arise. If, in its investigation of the Russian hacking and a Trump connection, the FBI did receive the fruits of some electronic surveillance of the Trump campaign, were Attorney General Loretta Lynch, White House aides or President Obama made aware of any such surveillance? Did any give a go-ahead to surveil the Trump associates? Comey would neither confirm nor deny that they did.

So, if Obama were aware of an investigation into the Trump campaign, using intel sources and methods, Trump would not be entirely wrong in his claims, and Obama would have some 'splainin' to do.

Is the FBI investigating the intelligence sources who committed felonies by illegally disclosing information about the Trump campaign?

Comey would not commit to investigate these leaks, though this could involve criminal misconduct within his own FBI.

Again, the only known crimes committed by Americans during and after the campaign are the leaks of security secrets by agents of the intel community, colluding with the Fourth Estate, which uses the First Amendment to provide cover for criminal sources, whom they hail as "whistleblowers."

Indeed, if there was no surveillance of Trump of any kind, where did all these stories come from, which their reporters attributed to "intelligence sources"?

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has recused himself from any role in the Russian hacking scandal. But the Justice Department should demand that the FBI put the highest priority on investigating the deep state and its journalistic collaborators in the sabotage of the Trump presidency.

If Comey refuses to do it, appoint a special counsel.

In the last analysis, as Glenn Greenwald, no Trumpite, writes for The Intercept, the real loser may well be the Democratic Party.

If the investigation of Russiagate turns up no link between Trump and the pilfered emails, Democrats will have egg all over their faces. And the Democratic base will have to face a painful truth.

Vladimir Putin did not steal this election. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama lost it. Donald Trump won it fair and square. He is not an "illegitimate" president. There will be no impeachment. They were deceived and misled by their own leaders and media. They bought into a Big Lie. ~~By Pat Buchannan, a Friend of America!

 Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , Tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
Friends of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights. Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.

WE THE PEOPLE

TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! 

Join The Resistance and Share This Article Now!