Sunday, October 23, 2016


By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and Friends!
When I started this blog it was because I was thrown off Facebook 2 times for two weeks each, and within a 5 week period! It was right before the New York primary and I was told later that it could have been because of the volume of posts, but I thought something else was going on, and then Facebook got accused of targeting Conservative points of view, and like Lois Lerner, abusing their power for political purposes. I was contacted by Richard Miller who asked me to join his group blog, 'FRIENDS OF LIBERTY' and I've been going at it for the last 7+ months. With the 'Paid to Report' Media not doing their 'due diligence' reporting the facts that should matter, and not the facts they get paid for is why, before November 8th, I, through common sense, report the facts as I truly believe they are! Obama has now come back to defend his legacy's number 1 achievement, and this is why I'm doing an up to date version of OBAMACARE: THE LIE OF THE LAND! 
The 2010 Affordable Care Act tipped off a long and bitter political and legal battle between the White House and Republicans in the U.S. Congress who said the 2010 law creates unwarranted government intervention in personal healthcare and private industry.President Barack Obama said on Thursday that his departure from office in January might be what it takes to begin to heal the political scars over Obamacare and allow for needed fixes to his signature healthcare law.
"Maybe now that I'm leaving office, maybe Republicans can stop with the 60-something repeal votes they've taken and stop pretending that they have a serious alternative ... and just work with the next president to smooth out the kinks,"    Hmmm, next President to smooth out the kinks? But Ryan, in a written response, said he would continue to seek to repeal and replace the law. "At this point, one thing is clear: this law can't be fixed." Republican nominee Donald Trump has pledged to repeal and replace the law, so when Obama says working with the ‘Next’ president on Obamacare, when the house speaker and Trump intend to repeal and replace, you should wonder what does he know, and does what he know have anything to do with the ‘fix’ being in?

If you recall, the Democrats in the House could pass their version of a Healthcare law. Because all revenue bills must originate in the House of Representatives, the Senate found a bill that met those qualifications: HR3590, a military housing bill. They took out essentially all the wording of it, and turned it into the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Obamacare. It gets better. The Senate at that time had 60 Democrats, just enough to pass Obamacare.
After the bill passed the Senate, the Democrat Senator Ted Kennedy died. In his place, Massachusetts elected Republican Scott Brown. That meant that, if the House made any changes to the bill, the Senate wouldn’t have the necessary number of votes to pass the corrected bill, since they knew no Republicans would vote for Obamacare. So, they made a deal with the Democrat‐controlled House of Representatives: The House would pass the Senate bill without any changes, IF the Senate agreed to pass a separate bill by the House that made changes to the Senate version of Obamacare. This second bill was called the Reconciliation Act of 2010.
 It made a bunch of detail changes, and added some things. So, the House passed PPACA, the Senate bill, as well as their Reconciliation Act. So now PPACA was ready for the President to sign, but the Senate still needed to pass the Reconciliation Act from the House. Confused yet?
Now, remember that the Senate only had 59 votes to pass the Reconciliation Act since Republican Scott Brown replaced Democrat Ted Kennedy. To pass the Reconciliation Act, therefore, the Democrats in the Senate DECIDED TO CHANGE THE RULES!

They declared that they could use the “Reconciliation Rule”—this is a different “reconciliation” than the House bill now. This rule was only used for budget item approval, so that budget items could be passed with only 51 votes in the Senate, not the usual 60. This rule was never intended to be used for legislation of the magnitude of Obamacare.
Too bad… they used it anyway. So, then both “Acts” passed both houses of Congress and were then signed by President Obama.

 In short, it’s a total disaster, with premiums set to spike to outrageous levels, 75 percent in Arizona alone. Another punch to the gut regarding this miserable failure of a health care law; there are fewer Americans with private insurance now than there were in 2007 (via Weekly Standard):
That's according to the federal government's own figures. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (see table 1.2b), 66.8 percent of those living in the United States had private health insurance in 2007. Now, as of 2015 (the most recent year for which figures are available), only 65.6 percent of those living in the United States have private health insurance.
It turns out that median incomes aren't the only thing that have dropped since 2007.
There are currently about 320 million people living in America. If the percentage who have private health insurance were as high now as it was in 2007, 3.8 million more people would now have private health insurance.
This isn’t the only thing that’s off. The projections from the Congressional Budget Office regarding where enrollment should be with Obamacare missed its target…by 24 million. Hope and change, folks. Matt Vespa |Posted: Oct 20, 2016 4:15 PM

OPEN ENROLLMENT– when individuals shopping for insurance can start to go online and see the premiums on new plans -- begins on Nov. 1, or just one week before the election. This means that for the months, weeks, and days leading up to the election, the Democratic presidential nominee and all of the party's Congressional candidates are going to have to contend with news of sky-rocking rates coming from Obamacare as insurers struggle to make the business profitable," he wrote.  And that is exactly how things are playing out.  USA Today is out with new reporting confirming that Obamacare rate spikes are being approved by regulators across the country -- some even green-lighting increases above and beyond what insurers requested:
State insurance regulators across the country have approved health care premium increases higher than those requested by insurers, despite a national effort to keep rates for policies sold on Affordable Care Act exchanges from skyrocketing, a USA TODAY analysis shows. In eight states, regulators approved premiums that were a percentage point or higher than carriers wanted, said Charles Gaba, a health data expert at ACASignups.net who analyzed the rates for USA TODAY. As of Tuesday, those states are Arizona, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Minnesota and Utah... “To consumers, this seems terrible like, ‘Oh, they’re price gouging us,’” Gaba said. “But part of regulators’ jobs is to keep insurance company’s solvent so they can continue to give people insurance.” In fact, this year many insurance carriers have requested premium rate increases that are closer to what regulators think are appropriate, says Gaba. “Ideally you want what’s requested to be what’s necessary,” he added. “And that was part of what happened.” Insurer withdrawals from some markets and rate hikes of more than 50% in some areas prompted fears that some insurance marketplaces were at risk of collapsing.

'They're just doing what's necessary to keep these companies afloat' is the whole problem. 
The reason that so many major insurers are pulling out of Obamacare is that the disproportionately sicker risk pools are quite expensive to cover, resulting in huge financial losses to the providers.  To offset those losses, enormous rate increases are being approved, making coverage even less affordable for the relatively realty consumers trying to keep their heads above water -- including millions who receive taxpayer subsidies through the law.  As their costs skyrocket even further, more and more younger, healthier people will either walk away from the law, or continue to avoid signing up for it.  After all, paying the individual mandate tax is much cheaper than shelling out big bucks every month, on top of out-of-pocket costs; plus, in the event of a health emergency, insurers are required under the law to accept all comers during open enrollment, regardless of pre-existing conditions.  This is the unsustainable, spiraling trajectory that has industry experts warning of a potential full collapse.  By the way, here is the article's accompanying infographic, illustrating the prevalence of double-digit premium increases.  As you peruse this map, recall that the tent pole promise of Obamacare was that it would significantly reduce costs for virtually all American consumers.  Instead, here is the "Affordable" Care Act reality:

Based on that chart, only a small handful of states will have the supposed 'good fortune' of experiencing single-digit hikes.  The vast majority will experience cost surges in the double-digits, with roughly half of all states getting slammed with increases of at least 20 percent.  Time magazine reviews the eight states where consumes will suffer the most next year, where regulators have imposed rate jumps of at least 30 percent.  The piece's opening sentence says it all:
"The Affordable Care Act is getting a lot less affordable for many Americans."  Meanwhile, many Arizonans find themselves in Obamacare's crosshairs, getting rocked by the double-whammy of soaring costs and dwindling-to-nonexistent choices:
Arizonans will have fewer options at higher rates when they buy coverage for 2017 on the federal health insurance exchange. This week, the Arizona Department of Insurance released details about the plans and rates being offered on the marketplace created by the Affordable Care Act. Maricopa County will only have one insurer on the exchange, Health Net, which is offering four plans and raising rates by nearly 75 percent. “It’s definitely on the high side. There's no question about that, but Arizona is not the only one with significant, more than 50 percent increases," insurance analyst Jim Hammond, publisher of the Hertel Report, said...In the rest of Arizona’s counties, except for Pima, Blue Cross and Blue Shield will be the only insurer. Those rates are going up 51 percent. Other insurers will be offering plans off the exchange this year, but most are also raising rates by about 70 percent. Open enrollment begins Nov. 1.
Arizona's Democratic Senate candidate calls her vote in favor of Obamacare one of her proudest moments. She's getting smoked.  Republicans should press this issue down the home stretch of the campaign.  As we mentioned yesterday, Americans for Prosperity is rolling out an ad campaign in key Senate races to help hold Democrats accountable for their failing law!
Beyond the millions who saw their existing coverage snatched away because of Obamacare in 2013 -- in violation of a major Obama pledge -- market disruptions have led to more than one million additional cancellations this year.  Those affected will have to wade back into marketplaces and contend with the bruising premium spikes laid bare on the map above.  It's little wonder, therefore, that some projections predict that the law's already-downgraded enrollment figures may plateau or even decline moving forward.  Obamacare is unpopular with the American people, and has consistently harmed more families than it's helped.  Hillary Clinton first proposed Obamacare during the 2008 campaign.
Guy Benson |Posted: Oct 20, 2016 1:15 PM

A new Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report updated the amount of money Obamacare robs out of Medicare from $500 billion to a whopping $716 billion between 2013 and 2022.
Per the CBO, the payment cuts in Medicare include:
•A $260 billion payment cut for hospital services.
•A $39 billion payment cut for skilled nursing services.
•A $17 billion payment cut for hospice services.
•A $66 billion payment cut for home health services.
•A $33 billion payment cut for all other services.
•A $156 billion cut in payment rates in Medicare Advantage (MA); $156 billion is before considering interactions with other provisions. The House Ways and Means Committee could include interactions with other provisions, estimating the cuts to MA to be even higher, coming in at $308 billion.
•$56 billion in cuts for disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments. * DSH payments go to hospitals that serve many low-income patients.
•$114 billion in other provisions pertaining to Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP* (does not include coverage-related provisions).
*Subtract $25 billion total between DSH payments and other provisions for spending that was cut from Medicaid and CHIP.
In total, Obamacare raids Medicare by $716 billion from 2013 to 2022. Despite Medicare facing a 75-year unfunded obligation of $37 trillion, Obamacare uses the savings from the cuts to pay for other provisions in Obamacare, not to help shore up Medicare’s finances.

A new report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said it will cost about $50,000 per person to insure every American under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) – otherwise known as Obamacare.
The CBO January 2015 Outlook on Obamacare, a 15-page section on the office’s lengthy budget outlook, asserts that at best, “24 million and 27 million” fewer Americans will be insured in 2025, compared to the year before Obamacare went into effect.

By our count at the Galen Institute, more than 70 significant changes have been made to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, at least 43 that the Obama administration has made unilaterally, 24 that Congress has passed and the president has signed, and three by the Supreme Court. ALL THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL ADD-ONS THAT OBAMA CHANGED AFTER IT WAS THE LAW!
Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
Don't forget to follow While You Were Sleeping on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks!

Friday, October 21, 2016


By Jonathan E.P. Moore
I don't know if you heard the debate, or the outrage about Trumps comments about waiting to, and accepting the outcome of the election process before he cries "Uncle," but one things for sure, it will take all Americans, no matter what political affiliation, or what you classify yourself as being, as long its a subcategory under being an American first, to come to the aid of our founding fathers and our Constitution to elect the not so perfect messenger whose message is the only message that will allow Americans to continue on, like we have done for the past 240 years, with our founding fathers vision for the most exceptional country in the world! 

If there was no chance of voter fraud in the 2016 election, then why was it discovered, after the fact, that Obama only won the 2012 election due to massive voter fraud in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida? Why is the DOJ and FBI leaders ignoring the law, and like Obama did with our immigration laws, using intent and interpretation instead of the letter of the Law and giving Hillary a pass on her criminal and treasonous actions against America and its secrets!
Hillary is a LIAR and if you notice it is always some else's advice she is following because she is unable to take responsibility for ANYTHING and she has no original thoughts except those given to her by the Globalist whose puppet she is and has been for years. ~~
WIKILEAKS: Podesta Says It’s OK for Illegals to Vote with Driver’s License….
Trump says the system is rigged, AND AGAIN HE’S RIGHT!!
Almost half of California’s driver’s licenses went to illegal aliens last year.
12 states and the District of Columbia allow driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants!
I’ve never been much of a conspiracy theorist, but I don't know how reasonable people can fail to recognize the overt collusion of the Obama administration, the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Party and the liberal media to shield Hillary Clinton from accountability for her many misdeeds and abundant corruption.
Perhaps I can be considered a bit of an alarmist, but if I am, so are millions of others when it comes to the dire state of this nation on a number of fronts. We have a staggering national debt, a dangerously declining military and a runaway regulatory state that is suppressing our liberties, insulating government from accountability and helping to smother economic growth. We have onerous taxes on people who are still working (notwithstanding the malicious lie that the wealthy don't pay their fair share), an exploding welfare state, a war on the Second Amendment and the rights of private gun owners, and a government-caused health insurance catastrophe -- with liberal promises of more of the same. We have unprotected borders (which threatens jobs, national sovereignty and the integrity of democratic processes), a war on Christian religious liberties by militant secularists who deny they're doing it and a sick, amoral culture supported by the openly valueless Democratic Party, which glorifies abortion as a quasi-religious right so important it must be subsidized by the federal government. We have politicized governmental entities -- e.g., the IRS, Department of Justice, Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Communications Commission -- and we are suffering ever-deteriorating race relations and a war on cops fomented and fueled by the president and his race-exploitive Democratic Party. We have proliferating Islamic terrorism accompanied by an administration that is in denial about it and sees more danger in generic extremism and conservative "bitter clingers" than it does in Islamic extremism.
These multitudinous existential threats to the United States are enough to cause anyone who cares about America, as founded, to lose sleep. I have confidence in the United States and the American people to rise to these challenges if they set their minds to it together. The problem is that the entire liberal establishment is determined to obstruct the resolution of these problems. Liberals are primarily responsible for every last one of them and don't even want to address them. To them, America is on the right course. They'll tell you they want more jobs, for example, but they do everything in their power to keep that from happening -- from minimum wage hikes to higher individual and corporate taxes to oppressive regulations to demonizing businesses, producers and entrepreneurs, who "didn't build that."
That's why many believe we must oust Democrats from control of the White House. But in the past few months, anyone not afflicted with blinding liberal bias has been able to see that these policy issues are just the beginning of our problems. In addition to this destructive agenda, there is a level of collusion among the above-mentioned institutions -- the Obama administration, the DNC, the Clinton machine and the liberal media -- that is unprecedented in this nation.
We see this collusion and its poison fruit everywhere we look, in the coordinated witch hunt against a phantom anti-Islam video to shield Hillary Clinton and the rest of the Obama administration from accountability for the terrorist attacks in Benghazi, in the White House, Department of Justice and FBI scheme to protect Clinton from prosecution for her destruction of emails, in the DNC's nefarious orchestration of violence and bullying of women at rallies for Donald Trump -- evidenced by the fact that the main operative of that enterprise visited the White House hundreds of times -- in the DNC's voter fraud operation, in Clinton's admitting that her private positions differ from her public ones, in the pay-to-play scandals of the Clinton Foundation and the administration's insulating it from investigation, in the administration's politicizing its actions according to various "food groups," such as "needy Latinos," in Clinton's lying about the threat of terrorists entering the United States among the refugees with whom she wants to flood this country, in the denigration of Catholics, in the delivery of debate questions to Clinton in advance, in the probable cover-up of Clinton's health issues, in the White House plan to target "violent ideologies," in liberals' goal of resurrecting the so-called Fairness Doctrine to suppress conservative opinion on radio, in the Democrats' refusal to enforce immigration laws, in the surrendering of our sovereignty to the United Nations, in the promotion of voter fraud by opposing voter ID laws with the cudgel of phony allegations of racism, in the political targeting of conservatives by the IRS, in the circumvention of the legislative branch through lawless executive orders, in the liberal media's absurdly disproportionate contributions to Democratic politicians and in the media's highlighting of allegations against Trump and blackout of allegations against Bill and Hillary Clinton. ‘DANGEROUS COLLUSION’ By David Limbaugh | Posted: Oct 21, 2016 12:01 AM ~~
As I have called Wikileaks in a recent post as ‘The Gift That Keeps on Giving,’ and it continued to do so again yesterday, and hopefully for the next 18 days!
So my advice to you is to sit down, don’t vote early, and when you do vote please know that your vote is not for 2 flawed candidates or their political party, but for the reelection of our founding fathers and our Constitution!
Thanks to WikiLeaks, the world now knows what President Obama's private email address is.
The site has been steadily posting caches of emails hacked from Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta. It recently highlighted a series of messages Podesta sent to one bobama@ameritech.net.
One of those messages got a reply — signed Barack and sent from a Blackberry smartphone.
There's no particular bombshells in the emails: It's mostly staffing decisions and scheduling quirks. The messages were sent in 2008, so there's no guarantee the president still uses that address. ~~
You would think that after Hillary’s comments about the response time of a nuclear reaction to our enemy’s advancement, and Hillary’s unsecured server which exposed our top secrets to the world and our enemies, and accidently giving ISIS $400 Million in weaponry, and losing or misplacing $6 Billion dollars at the State Department while she was Secretary of State, that the American People along with the Republicans and Democrats, the DOJ and FBI would be done with her, and kick her to the curb, but instead they risk their careers, reputation, integrity, and loyalty to America to defend her, why!
Following Wednesday’s presidential debate Pentagon officials found themselves completely dumbfounded as to why former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would feel it appropriate to announce U.S. Special Access Program intel on national television.
According to sources within the Department of Defense speaking under anonymity, Clinton likely violated at least two Dept. of Defense SAP protocols during the debate by announcing on live television the United States Government’s response time for a nuclear launch.
“But here’s the deal. The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.” –Hillary Clinton
To the dismay of intelligence officials, the fact that this top secret information is now publicly known not only proves that Clinton is “unfit to be commander-in-chief,” but it also poses a direct threat to national security, AGAIN!!!
One high ranking intelligence official explained that any time frame calculated pertaining to a US nuclear launch “would have merely been an educated hypothesis, absent leaked documents and there have been no such breaches” prior to Clinton’s admission Wednesday.
A top-ranking DOD intelligence source said.“Secretary Clinton proved tonight she is unfit to be commander-in-chief, and what she did compromises our national security. She is cavalier and reckless and in my opinion should be detained and questioned so we can unravel why she did what she did.”
According to Pentagon sources, the information Clinton disseminated publicly is Top Secret intelligence governed under the U.S. Special Access Program (SAP) which dictates safeguards and protocols for accessing and discussing highly classified and Top Secret intelligence. The specific details of the country’s nuclear response time discussed by Clinton, sources said, are only known by a handful of individuals outside top military brass…
“Targeting options by ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missiles), air or sea, launch order, launch procedures and response are some of the most secretly guarded tenets of national security and nuclear war policy,” a Pentagon source said. “It’s truly incredible that (nuclear) response time as part of an ERO (Emergency Response Option) is now out there in the public domain to our adversaries.”
U.S. Defense sources said according to developed U.S. counterintelligence, military officials in China, North Korea, Syria, Russia, Iran and even actors like ISIS had no previous definitive intelligence to determine the U.S. nuclear response time, especially during an ERO, prior to Clinton’s admission Wednesday night. Sources reluctantly acknowledged her calculations were accurate. ~~
Contrary to what people think about why Hillary is walking the streets today as a free corrupt political candidate for the president of the United States, it’s not our fault, but the fault of our elected officials who has contaminated our Justice System! First 1st it was the rogue AG Eric Holder who Obama understand, through interpretation and intent, that they could bypass the letter of the law and our Constitution, and then came the second generation James Comey, head of the FBI, and Loretta Lynch, who tells Comey which shoe to kiss! With just 19 days to go I would think that they would want to come back under the guise of being patriotic and loyal to America and its Constitutional Republic form of Democracy before their tenure expires in January, 2017! Here’s the vehicle in which they could accomplish that forgiveness! 
This Law, Title 18. Section 2071. States That Hillary Can No Longer Hold a Federal Position!!
Sometimes we look for the more complicated answers and overlook the straightforward ones.
Could this answer for Hillary’s running for the White House be as easy as this? Could the penalty for breaking this law mean that she cannot become president? This is an emphatic yes on both counts.
We all know that Hillary has broken many laws over the years. Well now a specific law that she has broken has been pointed out and this is big.
Apparently, the FBI forgot to visit the Cornell Law Library. Word for word from the Cornell Law Library Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton’s private email server illegal, it “disqualifies” her from holding any federal office. Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.
So here’s the one law you need to know that should terminate her presidential campaign:
For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here’s what it says:”(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”
Yes, it explicitly states “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.” But……….! ~~
The People who sell themselves are called PROSTITUTES Hillary is a POLITICAL PROSTITUTE and the Donor Class are the John's who spread AIDS to AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM. The only Cure is Dr. Donald J Trump who at his own expense has the 100% Cure Vaccine for The Political Aids, elect him POTUS so he can STOP the DC John's from Infecting American Exceptionalism and The Constitutional Republic called The United States of America!!!
The news media that promotes and supports Hillary are News Media Political Prostitutes they are not journalist they too have sold their souls and are Hillary's John's who spread the HIV (Hillary Innocence Vulgarity) to Enslave the Uniformed Ignorant Voter to be Slaves on the Demon-Marxist Plantation. They are LIARS versus telling the TRUTH of EQUAL OPPORTUNITY but not GUARANTEED EQUAL RESULTS. They leave the Ignorant Uniformed Voter with AIDS (Advanced Ignorant Destructive Society) with NO HOPE for families of future Generations!!!! America's only hope is to be extricated from the Polluted Cesspool of DC politics. A Cesspool is a body of water that has NO FRESH WATER coming in and NO EXIT of Stagnate Polluted water that foments a Cesspool of Death due to a lack of Oxygen which sustains life!!
Hillary Clinton just appeared on 'The View' and one of the hosts confronted her with a question about something she had recently said about abortion - and the presidential candidate's response has everyone buzzing...
Hillary believes in INFANTICIDE that children on the day of their birth can be aborted because the "Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" doesn't apply to the baby until possibly the second or third day!! The mother has the RIGHT to allow the baby to die with no consequences according to Hillary’s understanding of the law!
Hillary won’t be denied her coronation, nor will she give up using interpretation and intent to disarm legal American gun owners, and silence the extreme outrage toward Hillary and her coupe through strict 1st Amendment regulations! Hillary says that she has no intent to take our guns, but she never said her Supreme Court wouldn’t, and with her comments during an interview with George Stephanopoulos proves that her public message about the 1st and 2nd Amendments, having nothing to do at all about her private message, and just lying to Americans again:
A recent Fox News Sunday appearance where Hillary Clinton claimed:  "I'm not looking to repeal the Second Amendment. I'm not looking to take people's guns away."  The Washington Post noted a statement from her campaign website about how “gun ownership is part of the fabric of many law-abiding communities.”
In June, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos pushed Clinton twice on whether people have a right to own guns. “But that's not what I asked.  I said do you believe that their conclusion that an individual's right to bear arms is a constitutional right?”  Clinton could only say: “If it is a constitutional right.”
Similarly, in New York City in the fall, she told donors: “The Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment, and I am going to make that case every chance that I get.” In Maryland in April, Chelsea Clinton promised that her mom would appoint to the Supreme Court justices who would overturn past decisions that struck down gun-control measures.  But the only laws that the Supreme Court evaluated were complete gun bans and a law that made it a crime to use a gun!
Washington, D.C., had a complete handgun ban in place until 2008. It was also a felony, punishable by five years in prison, to put a bullet in the chamber of a gun. This amounted to a complete gun ban on using guns for self-defense. The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller struck down that ban.
Clinton told Stephanopoulos her opinion of this ruling: “I think that for most of our history, there was a nuanced reading of the Second Amendment until the decision by the late Justice Scalia.” She continued, “There was no argument until then that localities and states and the federal government had a right, as we do with every amendment, to impose reasonable regulation.”
Clinton went on to talk about her push for expanded background checks, an issue that was irrelevant to Scalia’s decision in Heller. Instead, the question is why was D.C.’s local gun bans a “reasonable regulation.” Why should people be imprisoned for five years for defending their families?
The media might not like to admit it, but The War on Guns is real. If Hillary wins in November, she will appoint Scalia’s successor and the Supreme Court will
overturn the Heller and McDonald decisions.  Make no mistake about it, the government will again be able to ban guns. Her claim that she isn't “looking to take people's guns away” is not consistent with her promise to overturn existing Supreme Court decisions.
 ~~By John R. Lott
PLEASE DO ME A FAVOR, COPY AND PASTE, REFORMAT, ADD YOUR OWN 2 CENTS AND TAKE OWNERSHIP OF THE ‘WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING’ WORDS, ONLY IF YOU AGREE, AND IF YOU DO AGREE TAKE THE TIME TO SUPPORT ‘AMERICA FIRST’ AND ‘MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!’ Don't forget to follow While You Were Sleeping on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks!

Thursday, October 20, 2016


By Jonathan E.P. Moore
Hillary Clinton has finally told the truth, but it took close to 30 years for that to happen, and with her riding off into the sunset after this election, is probably going to be her last opportunity to do so!
How can anybody vote for a Presidential candidate who should be in prison, or at least banned from running for public office for the rest of her life for her betrayal of trust of America’s top
secret information, but because of the crooked justice department and FBI leaders, has been given a free pass? The only reason I can possibly see this free ride is that Soros’s lose lips are not only profound, but insightful about the voter fraud ‘fix’ that is more than likely coming down the road on election day and even before through early voting!
George Soros literally says Trump will win popular vote but it’s already been decided that Clinton will be the POTUS!
How does George Soros know the outcome of this election, and with his voting machines in 16 states in 307 voting districts, you should be concerned! With the voter fraud that was exposed after the fact in 2012 of how Obama won through voter fraud over Mitt Romney, why wouldn’t you, like Trump, challenge the system and at least question the results when it’s almost impossible, with Hillary’s socialist agenda, attacks on the Second Amendment, her comments about how the first Amendment has some room for regulation, and don’t forget how she has a different private and public messages for all issues, so how would and could anyone vote for her, and allow her to win?
The only way voter fraud works is if the polls are too close to call to justify either outcome for either candidate, but as we have seen, the ‘Paid to Report’ Media is living up to their commitment to the cause, and at all costs, to make it feel closer than it actually is, intentionally!
What? Trump like 8 liberals can't question the election outcome? I guess the double standard used by this administration and Hillary, and protected by the 'Paid to Report' Media is still OK'd by the 'Will' of the American People?
8 Times Cry Baby Liberals Claimed An Election Was Stolen Or Rigged! 
Can we really know what Hillary said last night is anywhere near the truth, or just another one of Hillary Clinton’s political 'public or private position' on the issues?
Do you remember during the last debate ABC correspondent and debate moderator Martha Raddatz asked the Democratic presidential nominee about a statement she'd made in a speech saying "you need both a public and a private position" on issues?
"Is it ok for politicians to be two-faced? Is it acceptable for a politician to have a private stance on issues?"
The truth of the matter is that our elected officials from both sides of the aisles can’t afford a Trump victory, they can’t afford to have Trump discover what has been going on for years behind those Capitol Hill closed doors, and can’t afford to have Trey Gowdy appoint special prosecutors to investigate all the cast members, on both sides of the aisles who intentionally violated the laws of the land and the Constitution for personal power and wealth!
Hillary said that 17 of America’s security agencies that the Russians are the ones trying to influence our election, but if that’s the case why hasn’t President Obama, and those 17 agencies do anything about it, especially if they knew?
If it weren’t for Wikileaks, and the discovery of Hillary’s ‘Public and Private’ messaging, and adding her anti Catholic, Evangelical, and Latino’s to her basket of deplorables, which already include all Americans with an emphasis on Trump supporters being "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it!" So by her saying “You name it” she’s conceding that everyone else in America could be on that list also! 
What did we learn after the third and final debate?
We learned that Hillary’s claims of not raising the National Debt one dime was because of her fair share campaign against the ones that ‘butter her bread’ already, corporate America! Her plan is self-destructing, and it has been, as witnessed in other Socialist countries, to implode over and over again! How do you take money through taxing from the creators of jobs, which by the way causes the elimination of jobs and new hires in those companies? Hillary will be over taxing and regulating to finance her open borders, supporting unvetted refugees, and her EPA overregulated coal industry, etc.?
We have witnessed Obama’s failure with his ‘green’ agenda and the incentivized programs and companies that have cost Billions of taxpayers’ dollars, failed and out of business today! We watched Obamacare build a website using a Canadian company whose CEO(?) was a buddy of Michelle’s at college! We’ve witnessed, but not reported on by the ‘Paid to Report’ Media, Hillary’s State Dept. missing or misplacing $6Billion dollars at the same time ISIS was in its infancy, and then we have the WH acknowledging that Hillary accidently gave ISIS $400 Million in weaponry!
We learned that Hillary has offered nothing new and will continue to follow in the footsteps of her fellow Alinskyite, Barack Obama!
Hillary intends on leaving the borders wide open but vetting the 550% additional Syrian refugees she’s proposing after her homeland security advisors have told the American People that they couldn’t thoroughly vet Obama’s original 10,000!
Hillary continues to play Trump’s anti-woman card in the hopes that the American women are too stupid to realize that they come from the greatest country in the world that gives every woman the best chance of achieving their perceived and personal American Dream if they work hard and are determined, and like it has always been!
Hillary along with the help of the Globalist backed ‘Paid to Report’ Media are throwing everything but the kitchen sink, and then the kitchen sink, at Trump! Wikileaks is just proving what every honest American was already thinking about Hillary, and that she lies, continues to lie, and can’t be allowed to get her hands on that “Pen and Phone’ that Obama used, and she will continue to use, to bypass Congress, undermine and eliminate our constitution, use interpretation and intent instead of the letter of the law to put into place unconstitutional Executive Orders and Presidential Memorandums!
I heard nothing from Hillary about her personnel changes if she wins the White House. Do Obama’s regulation Czars remain? Does she intend to fire/ask to step down the crooked Justice Department’s lapdog’s, AG Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey who have together, along with the precedent setting Eric Holder before, have violated their oath of office, betrayed the job’s requirements and expectations and the definitions of the responsibilities of the job, and last but not least failed our justice system through fraud and deception for the sole purpose of protecting the anointed one from the mandatory laws that would disqualify her from possibly being president of the United States of America!
As the old saying goes: “Fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice, shame on you,” and with Alinskyite Obama shaming us all the first time, Alinskyite Hillary will not get that 2nd chance!
Trump stands for “making America great again,” and what makes that happen is the continuation of what has made America first in the world, and that’s capitalism, and even though capitalism isn’t perfect, but won’t bankrupt the country and it doesn’t reward failure and it can’t control you like socialism. To the contrary, in a capitalist system, businesses benefit from voluntary transactions. Do you want to get rich in a capitalist system? Find a way to give people what they want. If you’re just okay at it, you can make a decent salary. If you’re as good at it as Henry Ford or Bill Gates, you can become rich beyond imagination.
Do you want to get rich in a socialist system? Be well connected. Make friends or just pay off people who can give you government contracts. Make contributions to politicians so they’ll change the laws to help you and hurt your competitors. Get the government to take money from other people and give it to you as part of a bailout.
Which sounds more admirable? Which sounds healthier for our country? When you give the government unlimited power to create “equality,” you also give it the power to tilt the playing field towards corrupt businesses that have every incentive to try to take advantage of it.
At the end of the day, socialism is for slaves who are willing to give up their freedom for promises that they’ll be given some minimal level of support no matter what. On the other hand, capitalism is for people who want the freedom to rise or fall based on their own effort. If you know which type of person you are, then you know whether you should be a capitalist or a socialist.
Has the media ever been as rotten as it is now? Of course, the media is part of society and defends the current system. But within limits, there has been room for probing, investigative journalism. Today’s news stories, however, are dominated by repetitious, unchecked stories usually in the cynical service of political spin and naked profit.
The Press Buries Hillary Clinton’s Sins!
As reporters focus on Trump, they miss new details on Clinton’s rotten record.
If average voters turned on the TV for five minutes this week, chances are they know that Donald Trump made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women.
But even if average voters had the TV on 24/7, they still probably haven’t heard the news about Hillary Clinton: That the nation now has proof of pretty much everything she has been accused of. It comes from hacked emails dumped by WikiLeaks, documents released under the Freedom of Information Act, and accounts from FBI insiders. The media has almost uniformly ignored the flurry of bombshells, preferring to devote its front pages to the Trump story. So let’s review what amounts to a devastating case against a Clinton presidency.
Start with a June 2015 email to Clinton staffers from Erika Rottenberg, the former general counsel of LinkedIn. Ms. Rottenberg wrote that none of the attorneys in her circle of friends “can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to
review them and delete documents.” She added: “It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I’ve either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.”
A few months later, in a September 2015 email, a Clinton confidante fretted that Mrs. Clinton was too bullheaded to acknowledge she’d done wrong. “Everyone wants her to apologize,” wrote Neera Tanden, president of the liberal Center for American Progress. “And she should. Apologies are like her Achilles’ heel.”
Clinton staffers debated how to evade a congressional subpoena of Mrs. Clinton’s emails—three weeks before a technician deleted them. The campaign later employed a focus group to see if it could fool Americans into thinking the email scandal was part of the Benghazi investigation (they are separate) and lay it all off as a Republican plot.
A senior FBI official involved with the Clinton investigation told Fox News this week that the “vast majority” of career agents and prosecutors working the case “felt she should be prosecuted” and that giving her a pass was “a top-down decision.”
The Obama administration—the federal government, supported by tax dollars—was working as an extension of the Clinton campaign. The State Department coordinated with her staff in responding to the email scandal, and the Justice Department kept her team informed about developments in the court case.
Worse, Mrs. Clinton’s State Department, as documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show, took special care of donors to the Clinton Foundation. In a series of 2010 emails, a senior aide to Mrs. Clinton asked a foundation official to let her know which groups offering assistance with the Haitian earthquake relief were “FOB” (Friends of Bill) or “WJC VIPs” (William Jefferson Clinton VIPs). Those who made the cut appear to have been teed up for contracts. Those who weren’t? Routed to a standard government website.
The leaks show that the foundation was indeed the nexus of influence and money. The head of the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Ira Magaziner, suggested in a 2011 email that Bill Clinton call Sheikh Mohammed of Saudi Arabia to thank him for offering the use of a plane. In response, a top Clinton Foundation official wrote: “Unless Sheikh Mo has sent us a $6 million check, this sounds crazy to do.”
The entire progressive apparatus—the Clinton campaign and boosters at the Center for American Progress—appears to view voters as stupid and tiresome, segregated into groups that must either be cajoled into support or demeaned into silence. We read that Republicans are attracted to Catholicism’s “severely backwards gender relations” and only join the faith to “sound sophisticated”; that Democratic leaders such as Bill Richardson are “needy Latinos”; that Bernie Sanders supporters are “self-righteous”; that the only people who watch Miss America “are from the confederacy”; and that New York Mayor Bill de Blasio is “a terrorist.”
The leaks also show that the press is in Mrs. Clinton’s pocket.  Donna Brazile, a former Clinton staffer and a TV pundit, sent the exact wording of a coming CNN town hall question to the campaign in advance of the event. Other media allowed the Clinton camp to veto which quotes
they used from interviews, worked to maximize her press events and offered campaign advice.
Mrs.. Clinton has been exposed to have no core, to be someone who constantly changes her position to maximize political gain. Leaked speeches prove that she has two positions (public and private) on banks; two positions on the wealthy; two positions on borders; two positions on energy. Her team had endless discussions about what positions she should adopt to appease “the Red Army”—i.e. “the base of the Democratic Party.”
Voters might not know any of this, because while both presidential candidates have plenty to answer for, the press has focused solely on taking out Mr. Trump. And the press is doing a diligent job of it.  ~~By Kimberley A. Strassel
Donald Trump may or may not fix his campaign, and Hillary Clinton may or may not become the first female president. But something else happening before our eyes is almost as important: the complete collapse of American journalism as we know it.
The frenzy to bury Trump is not limited to the Clinton campaign and the Obama White House. They are working hand in hand with what was considered the cream of the nation’s news organizations.
The shameful display of naked partisanship by the elite media is unlike anything seen in modern America!
The largest broadcast networks — CBS, NBC and ABC — and major newspapers like the New York Times and Washington Post have jettisoned all pretense of fair play. Their fierce determination to keep Trump out of the Oval Office has no precedent.
Indeed, no foreign enemy, no terror group, no native criminal gang suffers the daily beating that Trump does. The mad mullahs of Iran, who call America the Great Satan and vow to wipe Israel off the map, are treated gently by comparison.
By torching its remaining credibility in service of Clinton, the mainstream media’s reputations will likely never recover, nor will the standards. No future producer, editor, reporter or anchor can be expected to meet a test of fairness when that standard has been trashed in such willful and blatant fashion.

Liberal bias in journalism is often baked into the cake. The traditional ethos of comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable leads to demands that government solve every problem. Favoring big government, then, becomes routine among most journalists, especially young ones.
I know because I was one of them. I started at the Times while the Vietnam War and civil rights movement raged, and was full of certainty about right and wrong.
My editors were, too, though in a different way. Our boss of bosses, the legendary Abe Rosenthal, knew his reporters leaned left, so he leaned right to “keep the paper straight.”
That meant the Times, except for the opinion pages, was scrubbed free of reporters’ political views, an edict that was enforced by giving the opinion and news operations separate editors. The church-and-state structure was one reason the Times was considered the flagship of journalism.
Those days are gone. The Times now is so out of the closet as a Clinton shill that it is giving itself permission to violate any semblance of evenhandedness in its news pages as well as its opinion pages.
A recent article by its media reporter, Jim Rutenberg, whom I know and like, began this way: “If you’re a working journalist and you believe that Donald J. Trump is a demagogue playing to the nation’s worst racist and nationalistic tendencies, that he cozies up to anti-American dictators and that he would be dangerous with control of the United States nuclear codes, how the heck are you supposed to cover him?”
Whoa, Nellie. The clear assumption is that many reporters see Trump that way, and it is note­worthy that no similar question is raised about Clinton, whose scandals are deserving only of “scrutiny.” Rutenberg approvingly cites a leftist journalist who calls one candidate “normal” and the other ¬ “abnormal.”
Clinton is hardly “normal” to the 68 percent of Americans who
find her dishonest and untrustworthy, though apparently not a single one of those people writes for the Times. Statistically, that makes the Times “abnormal.”
Also, you don’t need to be a ­detective to hear echoes in that first paragraph of Clinton speeches and ads, including those featured prominently on the Times’ website. In effect, the paper has seamlessly ­adopted Clinton’s view as its own, then tries to justify its coverage.
It’s an impossible task, and Rutenberg fails because he must. Any reporter who agrees with Clinton about Trump has no business covering either candidate.
It’s pure bias, which the Times fancies itself an expert in detecting in others, but is blissfully tolerant of in itself. And with the top political editor quoted in the story as ­approving the one-sided coverage as necessary and deserving, the prejudice is now official policy.
It’s a historic mistake and a complete break with the paper’s own traditions. Instead of dropping its standards, the Times should bend over backwards to enforce them, even while acknowledging that Trump is a rare breed. That’s the whole point of standards — they are designed to guide decisions not just in easy cases, but in all cases, to preserve trust.
The Times, of course, is not alone in becoming unhinged over Trump, but that’s also the point. It used to be unique because of its adherence to fairness.
Now it’s only standard is a double standard, one that it proudly ­confesses. Shame would be more appropriate. ~~By Michael Goodwin
PLEASE DO ME A FAVOR, COPY AND PASTE, REFORMAT, ADD YOUR OWN 2 CENTS AND TAKE OWNERSHIP OF THE ‘WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING’ WORDS, ONLY IF YOU AGREE, AND IF YOU DO AGREE TAKE THE TIME TO SUPPORT ‘AMERICA FIRST’ AND ‘MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!’ Don't forget to follow While You Were Sleeping on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks!