CIA PAID $600 MILLION TO WAPO TO PUBLISH TRUMP DISINFORMATION!

By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and Friends of America!
CIA PAID $600 MILLION TO WAPO TO PUBLISH TRUMP DISINFORMATION!

How many of you have seen this story, and how many of you think that this story is fake news? Well, the truth is that it is real, and if you took the time to look it up on the internet on your own time you would see pages on your search request right in front of your very own eyes!

The CIA lies and hides behind the direction of the World Order elitists, and if they can’t stop Trump and short circuit his ‘make America great again’ campaign talking points, they're doomed! Trump’s mandated vision for America is supported by the ‘Will’ of the American people, and if you still don’t believe in the rule of law, or our Constitutional Republic, then you have the ‘free’ choice to move to a place where your ideals will be respected and supported. Americans have watched the individual European countries lose their identity and being threatened by refugees that won’t assimilate or even yield to the laws and religious beliefs of these host countries that have open their doors and hearts to waves of unvetted refugees! Another question that comes to mind for me is this the new 'Russian' McCarthyism that I see running rampant in the Progressive 'Paid to Report' Media? Are our politicians who associate with legal Russian citizens be accused of being a traitor and allowing Russia to corrupt our election process? Are all Russians spies? Sessions, through doing his job recuses himself because he met with a Russian Diplomat because it's part of his job description? Should all Russians working in the White House or Trump Tower, no matter what the job, be considered a Russian spy working for Putin? They haven't found anything yet to tie President Trump to the Russians, but I also know and expected before voting for Trump that his pre Presidential years, when he did international business deals, were legal and probably OK'd by whatever government agencies he had to get approvals from! Can you imagine the spin on those deals, and then like Obama, the interpretation and drummed up intent that the 'Paid to Report' Media will use to undermine the Trump Presidency?  ......WOW, AND YOU KNOW IT'S COMING!!
The ‘Paid to Report’ Media is doing nothing to give the American people a window into what’s happening overseas in these once unique countries! They are not showing you the atrocities that are being levied on the citizens of these generous hosting countries, and they are not showing you what’s already happening in America as we speak because of Obama’s disrespect for our Constitution and our rule of law. ~~

Washington Post owner, Jeff Bezos, was awarded a $600 million federal contract by the Obama administration to publish disinformation about Donald Trump.

The Amazon founder was tasked with undermining the new President via ‘leaked’ CIA documents given to him when he first took over at WaPo.

Much worse and even more suspicious is the majority of the people have not been informed that Bezos landed a $600 million federal contract and by who? The CIA.

The “deal” is for a computing cloud developed by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It also just happens AWS services all 17 agencies within the US intelligence community.

An unholy alliance in which Bezos stands to gain many more millions by pacifying and working with the CIA through his publication The Washington Post. “Leaks” and “information” Bezos will publish without question, without proper verification and journalistic sourcing.

The CIA will now have its own propaganda publication to do whatever it likes in misinforming and manipulating the American people and the voters.

Vital information intentionally withheld from the American people, as Bezos uses the Post to forge pocket lining government contracts while promoting his own personal political agenda.

Is this lack of reporting of the Bezos/CIA partnership by the MSM the result of massive incompetency? Or a very well organized cover up within the MSM inner circle of four or five elitists who now own six companies that control over 90 percent of MSM outlets?

The same outlets which through diverse company divisions own every television station and newspaper in this country with the exception of very small, weekly community publications and certain Christian networks. Even many of those community weeklies have been scooped up by larger publication divisions.

Are we connecting the dots at each cross section of intertwining strings holding together this corrupt spider web? A vast interlocking network designed to lure and trap average American citizens into its carefully woven web of manipulation and deceit.

The Washington Post is the most widely known and respected news outlet in the world, reaching more people than any other publication including the NY Times. It has always been the standard in which journalistic ethics are established and adhered to by other publications. It sets the example to be followed by the everyday journalists out there on the beat trying to do their jobs.

By utilizing the internet and social media, the Post has literally millions of subscribers and followers reading and watching online video on a daily basis. It is the media center of the nation’s capital and the eye of the DC political belt.

 Click here>    Fake News is REAL: More Undeniable Proof!        

Control the Washington Post and you control the message; the MSM and the “agenda.”

“The Post is unquestionably the political paper of record in the United States, and how it covers governance sets the agenda for the balance of the news media,” journalism scholar Robert W. McChesney revealed to Altenet.org in a December investigative article.

“Citizens need to know about this conflict of interest in the columns of the Post itself,” he added.

In the same article, a statement released by the Public Institute of Advocacy quoted McChesney as saying:

“If some official enemy of the United States had a comparable situation — say the owner of the dominant newspaper in Caracas was getting $600 million in secretive contracts from the Maduro government — the Post itself would lead the howling chorus impaling that newspaper and that government for making a mockery of a free press. It is time for the Post to take a dose of its own medicine.”

If this alliance between the CIA and Bezos isn’t illegal, then it is certainly unethical and displays a huge conflict of interest while also exposing the corruption existing within the MSM. The main sources of news and information Americans sought and believed, until the rise of alternative media outlets.

Alternative sources of information the MSM bash and attempt daily to discredit as “fake news,” when “fake,” misleading and sometimes right out lies being spread across social media come out of the MSM and pseudo extremist left-wing sites erected simply to misinform and confuse the American voter.

Many Facebook pages and websites that have “popped” up over the past several years whose resources and money are being funded by George Soros’s well oiled “Media Matters” machine. Just one of many “nonprofit” organizations extending from his Open Society Foundation.

Soros also has imbedded ties to many MSM outlets including The New York Times, the Associated Press, NBC and ABC and here it is again, the Washington Post. Readers are urgently encouraged to research Soros, his history and his worldwide organizations.

 Click here>   The Video Mainstream News Absolutely Does NOT Want You to See!!      

Altnet also writes, “Amazon’s offer wasn’t the low bid, but it won the CIA contract anyway by offering advanced high-tech ‘cloud’ infrastructure.”

So how is at a time government should be pinching pennies due to the increasing national debt, the CIA passed over lower bidders for the contracted services?

The answer tracks back to the infamous blocking of the WikiLeaks website by Bezos’s company Amazon Web Services (AWS), a service Bezos personally and publicly brags is the most advanced and best high-tech “cloud” infrastructure on the market.

“WikiLeaks was booted from Amazon’s webhosting service AWS. So, at the height of public interest in what WikiLeaks was publishing, readers were unable to access the WikiLeaks website,” reported watchdog group Fair in 2013.

So why did AWS give WikiLeaks the boot? Most likely at the bequest of the CIA, whom Bezos has been doing business with since 2013 when the $600 million contract was awarded to AWS. Bezos also has close ties to the Clintons and backed Hillary in her failed run for the presidency, both in the 2008 primary campaign and in 2016 as the Democrat nominee.

Bezos also publicly voices open contempt for President Trump, and his policies. He recently was behind the Washington challenge to Trump’s 90-day immigration ban and threatened suit himself in an email to his employees, as was reported on this site.

Bezos, without any reference to stock holders input or lack of agreement, said he will put the full resources at Amazon to defeat the policy and implied his mission of taking down President Trump.

It was Bezos’s Washington Post that first leaked documents and led the charge to discredit Trump’s national security advisor cabinet pick. General Michael Flynn was forced to resign due to the unverified information touted in the “leaks.” Flynn was cleared by the FBI of any wrongdoing in those leaks. But the damage was already done.

In recent days, it has been revealed the CIA has full intention of attempting a coup to remove Trump from office, even though “The Donald” was democratically elected by American voters in a free election.

And it appears in the CIA is in conspiracy with Bezos’s plan to use the Washington Post to achieve a mutual goal: to disrupt and destroy President Trump and his administration. A goal that has no regard or concern for national security or the safety and well-being of American citizens.

Any impact on the average citizen, including possible loss of life by terrorist attacks is considered “collateral damage.”

In an exchange of tweets on Feb. 15, John Schindler, former NSA analyst and national security columnist for the Observer answered a question asking what he thought was going on at the NSA right now. Schneider responded, citing a friend in the intelligence community reference to Trump:

Which begs a bigger question than the unethical alliance between the CIA, Bezos and his Washington Post:

Could Trump be impeached? Of is he in danger of befalling the same fate as President Kennedy? Being a previous “anti-establishment” president, Kennedy sought to disengage from the Vietnam conflict and dissolve the Federal Reserve, but was assassinated.

Actions that directly impacted the CIA and wealthy elitists. 

Obama's Media Machine: State Run Media 2.0?

WASHINGTON, Feb. 15, 2011

As the 2012 presidential campaign kicks into gear, President Obama's White House media operation is demonstrating an unprecedented ability to broadcast its message through social media and the Internet, at times doing an end-run around the traditional press.

The White House Press Office now not only produces a website, blog, YouTube channel, Flickr photo stream, and Facebook and Twitter profiles, but also a mix of daily video programming, including live coverage of the president's appearances and news-like shows that highlight his accomplishments.

But while these innovative communications tools ostensibly offer greater transparency and openness, critics say they have come at a troublesome expense: less accountability of the administration by the independent, mainstream press.

Over the past few months, as White House cameras have been granted free reign behind the scenes, officials have blocked broadcast news outlets from events traditionally open to coverage and limited opportunities to publicly question the president himself.

Obama's recent signing of the historic New START treaty with Russia and his post-State of the Union cabinet meeting, for example, were both closed to reporters in a break with tradition. And during a recent question and answer session with the president and visiting Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the White House imposed an unusual limit of just one question each from the U.S. and Canadian press corps.

"The administration has narrowed access by the mainstream media to an unprecedented extent," said ABC News White House correspondent Ann Compton, who has covered seven administrations. "Access here has shriveled."

Members of the press have always had quibbles with White House media strategies, calling cut-backs in access an affront to transparency, even as administration officials insist they're simply taking advantage of new technologies.

But some say the current dynamic is different, and dangerous.

"They're opening the door to kicking the press out of historic events, and opening the door to having a very filtered format for which they give the American public information that doesn't have any criticism allowed," said University of Minnesota journalism professor and political communication analyst Heather LaMarre.

Obama's 'State Run Media 2.0'

LaMarre and other political communication experts say the Obama White House is continuing the policy started by President George W. Bush, who famously vowed to "go over the heads of the filter and speak directly to the people," and capitalizing on new media and social media to do so more easily than ever before.

The White House has amassed 1.9 million followers on Twitter, 900,000 fans on Facebook and averages 250,000 visits to its YouTube channel per month. Its website received roughly 1.1 million unique visitors in January, according to ComScore.

By contrast, ABC News has 1.2 million followers on Twitter, 150,000 fans on Facebook, and averages 21.7 million unique visitors per month to ABCNews.com, according to ComScore.

"What you're seeing on the Internet is transparency at its finest," said Earnest, the White House spokesman. "We are giving citizens across the country direct access to decision makers in the government."

Earnest said the effort to build and engage an online audience was intended to supplement the independent press, not supplant it.

And while critics might disagree, there's plenty of evidence to suggest that some Americans might not care.

"If Nixon had announced he was going to start the 'Nixon channel' and said they were only going to put up stuff he approved of, people would have said, 'Oh my God, this is like Communist Russian state media,'" said David Perlmutter, director of the University of Iowa School of Journalism and Mass Communication.

"But now social media have a friendly face on them, so these media tools are not seen by the public -- particularly younger Americans -- as some sort of power grab by the president or government," he said. "They're just modern ways of reaching out and communicating."

Perlmutter says what he calls "state run media 2.0" might be just what younger generations, who polls show are disillusioned with the mainstream press, are looking for. And, he said, satisfying their "need to feel connected" could give Obama the edge among tech-savvy voters heading into the next campaign.

"They want to ask the questions themselves, post questions on the White House blog, tweet the president or Robert Gibbs directly," he said. "They don't think, 'Oh my gosh, this is bypassing an important filter of information.' They don't care about the filter." ~~By Devin Dwyer

With the current threat of Facebook's feckless ability to be bipartisan, feel free to befriend me at 'Jonathan E P Moore' to get direct and instant access, or follow 'While You Were Sleeping' at www.whileyouweredozing.blogspot.com 


Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Google Plus, and PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.