'THE 'WIMPIFICATION' OF AMERICA!' BY BARACK OBAMA.

By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and Friends of America!
'THE 'WIMPIFICATION' OF AMERICA!' BY BARACK OBAMA. 

It’s time for all Americans to take back our country from the political process and start thinking on our own! The ‘Paid to Report’ Media sets us up, and 'political correctness' knocks us down, and if we don’t take the time to understand what the end game truly is, then you might as well kiss America’s exceptionalism goodbye!

We all get up every day and put our pants/skirts on the same way as everyone else, we hopefully all shower, brush our teeth, put deodorant on, and comb our hair, but what changes is that moment when we all look in the mirror, and based on the input from the day before intel, 'cop' an attitude! Before we even open the door to start the day we put up our defenses, turn off our ears, and open our mouths to either eat, but more than likely to spew perfectly chosen soundbites that the ‘agenda journalist’ have placed in your head to defend a position that parallels the beliefs of your inner circle, and then used to silence counter commentary!

What ever happened to common sense, whatever happened to using your mouth proportionally to using your ears, (listening 2x more than speaking), whatever happened to:

 “You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself.”      Leviticus 19:18  ESV

America, through history, has been the most magnanimous country in the world that came to the aid of any other country in need, and came at the drop of hat. America has always been a leader that other countries look up to and depend on, but over the last 8 years we had a sitting President that tried to change that status so that the ‘New world order,’ and not America, would become the new 'go to' guy while America took a back seat, and transformed into that 3^rd world Socialist pawn that's just like the rest of the world.

The plan was to make it appear that all Americans were oppressed in some form, and by doing so through Political Correctness, would create a divided nation, which would make the transformation to Socialism through another one of Alinsky’s 8 rules to ruin:

  8) CLASS WARFARE: Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

Are Americans being oppressed, are women being treated like dogs with no rights, are Christian being beheaded and murdered for just being Christian, are gays being persecuted and thrown off buildings because they’re gay, does the Constitution and Bill Rights expand your horizons, or close doors, are Americans given every opportunity to be whoever and whatever they want through hard work and focus, and last but not least, can Americans truly live the American Dream if they choose to work hard, and if they choose not to, hold out their hand to get a dollar from another American who is working and fulfilling his American Dream, and not having to work a day in their life?

Americans aren’t oppressed based on the avenues one can take to better themselves, but are oppressed by themselves and the negative surroundings that influence their view of the world. Unfortunately, everybody is born with a blank slate, and while they don’t have control of what’s written on that slate, they truly believe in what’s written on it!

After all this is said and done the real problem is that, unlike WWI and WWII, Americans will not drop what they’re doing to runoff and defend the world against todays threats like we did in the past! It’s not about the ‘he said she said’ squabbling over the ‘Russians.’ It’s not about the process instead of the truth that the process manages to hide from the public intentionally because the ‘Swamp’ believes Americans don’t know what’s best for themselves, and can’t act responsibility to combat or defend ourselves against the political perceived dangers that these career moochers have lived off of for decades, and the exact same dangers that these 'agenda journalists' write 'Fake' unwitty memes about!

All of this is what our enemies, here on American soil and abroad, are hoping for! The triple ‘D’s,” and I don’t mean ‘diners, drive-ins, and dives,’ but dissent, division, deception, and the intentional dismantling and disarming of our military’s strength, Social engineering of our armed forces, and then the forced retirement or release of our top military advisors and officials!

The ‘Wimpification’ of  America is what’s wrong with our country today, and it’s not about Americans being oppressed, but the unwillingness of Americans to break the habit of Political Correctness, and the side effects that still prevent America from being great again!

SORRY, LIBERALS, THERE ARE NO OPPRESSED AMERICANS!

It’s sad to see so many Americans turn into losers, pathetically demanding to be treated as victims, all so the emotional vampires on the Left can feel better about themselves for helping such pathetic sad sacks.

Liberals LOVE for people to think of themselves as victims. They love for people to go through life furious, upset over things most people wouldn’t even notice. They need you alienated and angry so they can control you and turn you out at the polls, so they can get their sick little self-esteem boost for helping a poor little mediocrity like you.

If you’re black or Hispanic and think white people hate you, if you’re gay and think the Christians want to wipe you out, or if you’re a woman who believes the patriarchy is keeping you down, you’re going to have an unhappy life. It doesn’t matter if things are going well or you have success; you’re going to be angry. You’re going to feel mistreated. You’re going to walk around chalking up every normal event in the world to bias that primarily exists in your head. You’re going to nurse grievances. You’re going to be unhappy.

As consolation, you can half-ass your way through life and chalk up your failures to “white racism,” “those hypocritical Christians,” or “the patriarchy.” You can live with the illusion that, like Elizabeth Cady Stanton, you’re fighting for women’s rights, or, like Martin Luther King, you’re trying to reform a society teeming with racism -- but that only makes you sound like a joke. Stanton was fighting for women’s right to vote. Today, feminists whine about having to pay for their birth control. Martin Luther King was fighting for equal rights, and today liberal “black leaders” spend their time bitching about whether hoop earrings are cultural appropriation. There are legions of liberal Don Quixote’s jousting with windmills and pretending that the trivia they obsess over gives meaning to their victimhood-centered lives.

As an extra added bonus, you get to be the person who stops all the fun when you walk in the room. You get to be the one always accusing random white people of using white privilege or explaining that eating Chinese food is cultural appropriation. You get to be the one throwing out fake statistics (“There’s a huge spike in wife beating on Super Bowl Sunday.”) and constantly playing the “I’m more sensitive than you” game. People have to hold back jokes and to walk on eggshells around you because they don’t want to listen to your tedious lectures about how they’re not “woke.”

There are whole communities that have been governed by black liberals for decades that blame all their problems on white Republicans -- all because people grow to love that victimhood. They love that ready-made excuse for every problem in their lives. It isn’t because they didn’t go to college and they talk like they’re ignorant that they can’t get a job; it’s racism. Black Americans aren’t going to jail in higher numbers because they’re committing more crimes percentage-wise; it’s racism! Americans are sick of Barack Obama? Must be racism. They can sniff out hidden racism like a drug-sniffing dog on a pack of cocaine, but they can’t ever admit that 95% of their problems are self-created, just the same as they are with every white American.

Nobody of any race makes you choose to have unprotected sex and get pregnant at 16. Nobody makes you choose to have three kids by three different baby daddies. Nobody makes you flunk out of school. Nobody makes you spend money on partying instead of your rent. Nobody makes you assault a police officer. Nobody makes you rob a house and get a criminal record. It’s not oppression. It’s a sub-culture that says you can make every mistake in the world, but your screwed-up life is still someone else’s fault.

There are women, gays, and minorities around the world dying to get into the United States. The ones that get the opportunity to do so legally spend thousands of dollars and put up with years of paperwork to come here. You think that’s because it’s such a racist, sexist, oppressive country? It’s ridiculous. It’s silly.

It’s not a white thing or a black thing, a male thing or a female thing, a conservative or liberal thing. If you’re a conservative white male who blames all the problems in your life on black people, you’re a loser. If you’re a liberal black woman who blames all the problems in your life on white people, you’re a loser. If you’re a woman who blames all the difficulties in your life on “the patriarchy,” you are a loser. In life, if you’re going to be not just successful, but happy, you hold yourself responsible and take care of your own issues. If you don’t like how something in the world is, you try to change it, but you don’t whine and cry and talk about how terrible life is for you because you were born the wrong race or sex. Hold yourself to a higher standard than that. Look for the opportunities that often get missed because they require some work. Be a better person and stop lying to yourself about oppression in the least racist, most welcoming country in the history of humankind. ~~By John Hawkins, a Friend of America!

ISLAM LOVES OUR POLITICAL CORRECT PUSSIFICATION, OUR LIBERAL JUDGES, AND NOT BEING BANNED FROM ENTERING AMERICA!

I don't know who started the politically correct pussification process of the male collective, but I'd like to find them and pistol whip them into next week with my S&W Model 29 for ruining our planet.

Well... simply put: it's because males are being shamed, taught, lead, pastored, drugged, schooled, coerced and cajoled into throwing out their brains, handing over their balls and formally abandoning the rarefied air of the testosterone-leader-fog that God and nature hardwired them to dwell in; and instead they've become a weak, effeminate, mangina-sporting, shriveled up quail. That's why.

I hate this emasculated culture and It's pathetic and pervasive and its effects on society are deadly. As in, literally. I'll explain later.

If you think I'm full of specious doo, then sit your skinny-jean-wearing butt down in your Hello-Kitty chair and watch a little TV and pay close attention to the male characters, whether fictitious or “real”, and tell me with a straight face that you'd want these preening dandies to have your back in a gunfight.

A couple of weeks ago, I took the TV Puss Test and here's what I observed being directly and indirectly shoveled down our male pie-holes regarding what “being a man” meant.

•Man buns and glitter beards are now “all the rage”.

•The Boy Scouts of America have banned water pistols.

•Boys at this one school aren't allowed to play soldier any more.

•A university banned fencing because a sword fight might break out.

•Brotox is becoming popular among men.

•Some lame-ass company now has “Diet Whiskey” for “men”.

•A thirteen-year-old boy was actually punished for being a hero.

•A study showed that men are now beginning to talk like girls. Like in ... OMG.

•A gym removed its squat rack because it was intimidating to its squishy clients.

•I saw on Facebook an old pro-toy gun TV advert that sure as shizzle wouldn't fly today.

•And most male actors are not men in the classic sense of the word that I grew up with, but rather male tinker pots that are required to cry on cue.

And that was just scratching the pop culture surface; and it doesn't include the uber-effeminate “Christian” TV zombies or our craven politicians on the Left and the Right.

Speaking of politicians... the reason Donald Trump has mass appeal is he's not afraid of anyone

That said, I believe one of the rankest places our pussification shows it's browless noggin is in regards to Islam. These ridiculous and antiquated people want to conquer and kill us and we're told to not point that out.

Back in the day, our news sources, military leaders and politicians wouldn’t mince words about Nazis, or Stalin’s thugs, or Japan’s shiitake; but God forbid that we should say that Islam spawns’ terrorism more than fried eggs and bean dip make Rosie O’Donnell gassy.

Yep, one of the most egregious forms of effeminization, and one that yields up the most ubiquitous examples, especially during Obama’s reign of terror as Wuss-In-Chief, is the politically correct fetal position the “media”, and especially liberal politicians, take when discussing bat-crap crazy Islam. It’s pathetic.

Here's how lame some men have become when facing Muslim Mayhem at home and abroad. I grabbed these headlines from my website ClashDaily.com. Check it out:

•Brits Cancel Mohammad Cartoon Exhibit Because It's Too Offensive

•UK Pool to Ban Bikinis and ‘Islamically Inappropriate Swimwear'

•US Embassy Removes July 4 Celebration Out of ‘Respect for Islam’

•NYT Whines About How Our Bad-Ass SEAL Team 6 Kills Terrorists

•Oxford University Warns Authors Don’t Write About Bacon, Might Offend Muslims

•NYT Says, Chris Kyle ‘Insane’– Bruce Jenner ‘Courageous’

•College Students Demand That American Sniper be banned from Campus Because It’s Too Offensive.

As Col. Ralph Peters famously said, “My God, ISIS is taking over the Middle East, and our President can’t even say Islamist Terror.”

Daily, I see the most “You-gotta-be-kidding-me” excuses made, and cover given for, Muslim rapes and violence in Europe. It’s disgusting and it’s turned deadly in Sweden and Paris all via the intentional kissing of Islamic butt.

Personally, I think Europe is done. Their culture has become too PC and the invasion of Islam now too expansive for them to recover.

Finally, Leftists and Islam need you to be cowardly, docile and house-trained. They must eradicate a man’s masculinity in order for their evil machinations to thrive; and they’re doing a good job of making males spineless weasels aplenty… a society of frightened men.

Here’s my easy prediction: until men start acting like men and defy these religious Islamic monsters, then you and I can expect more massacres, rapes and invasions, and loss of our sacred liberties; and all because of our culture's systematic pussification.

IT'S TIME FOR THE OPPRESSED REPUBLICAN PARTY TO TAKE BACK AMERICA, USE THE NUCLEAR OPTION TO BRING PROGRESSIVISM TO ITS KNEES, AND MAKE THE DEMOCRATS CHOKE ON OBAMA'S 'OBAMACARE' LEGACY!

At my age I'm pretty sure I don't need maternity care.

At her age I'm pretty sure my granddaughter doesn't need health insurance for her end-of-life needs.

But what do I know? I'm just a dumb citizen.

According to the architects of Obamacare - if you can call the Democrats who designed President Obama's signature failure "architects" - I can't be trusted to buy my own health insurance.

The architects of Obamacare in Washington, all Democrats, decided six or seven years ago they knew what the best health plan was for everyone, rich or poor, healthy or sick, old or young, Californian or New Yorker.

For them health-care choice was never an option for individual American citizens - it was one-size fits all.

They decided that every American human being, no matter what their sex, age, health or personal needs or desires, deserved Cadillac care for any possible sickness or service.

Just in case you might desire to change your gender someday, for instance, you'd be covered for the necessary surgery ---- and get to pay for it in your insurance premium today.

When they drew up their plans the architects of Obamacare promised the moon but they delivered the usual piece of government space junk.

They promised insurance premiums would be low and be subsidized for the poor. Co-pays also would be minimal.

They promised all Americans would have access to affordable quality health care!

But in the real world it turned out many people can't afford to use their Obamacare insurance cards to actually purchase health care because the deductibles are too expensive, or Obamacare's architects severely limited the kinds of health care plans insurance companies were allowed to offer customers.

It should surprise no one that Obama's pie-in-the sky promises have been broken and his plan is on fire and crashing to Earth.

It was cynically designed by his administration and Democrats in Congress to have its inevitable and widely predicted problems emerge after Obama was safely reelected in 2012.

But now even some Democrats are admitting Obamacare has got serious problems.

Of course, no one in the liberal media is pressing Chuck Schumer or Nancy Pelosi to reveal how they'd change Obamacare to make it better.

If the media did ask a Washington Democrat to solve a problem they've created with one of their social policies, we all know the answer - throw more federal money and subsidies at it.

Republicans want radical changes that will get the government out of the health care insurance racket.

They want to repeal and replace Obamacare's mandates so that individuals can buy the health insurance plan they want from insurance companies that want to sell it to them.

What a concept.

They want individuals and small businesses to be able to join together in larger groups or insurance pools to pay lower premiums.

And they want people to be able to buy their health insurance across state lines (like car insurance and a million other things) instead of being forced to buy from their state's monopoly provider.

What concepts - freedom and choice.

The American people got Obamacare shoved down their throats because of the liberal myth that government knows best about everything.

Republicans in Congress - if they can get their act together and stop fighting each other ---- are in a position to radically change things for the better.

But they need to come together, present a patient-based, market-based repeal & replace health care plan to the Senate and then force the Democrats there to explain to the country why they are the ones whose filibusters are preventing it from passing.

Republicans have to make the Democrats own and defend Obamacare, which will soon die a natural death.

If that doesn't work, President Trump should invite every Republican and Democrat leader from Congress into the White House and lock the doors.

Then he should not allow anyone of either party to eat or pee or leave until they come up with a solution.

Reconciliation is a limited venue to make changes. It has boundaries, right? so if you have a three-step approach, reconciliation being the first step, and buying across state lines doesn’t fit into reconciliation, then any package coming from the House after reconciliation must get 60 votes. There’s no way the Democratic Party is going to vote for a concept that opens up health care to more competition and outside government control. That’s what this whole damn thing’s about to begin with, is that they believe that health care should be provided by the government. We believe you should have more choices. And I don’t see eight of them helping us get our, you know, get this thing done. That’s just not going to happen. ~~By unknown----, a Friend of America!

 Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , Tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
Friends of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights. Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.

WE THE PEOPLE

TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! 

Join The Resistance and Share This Article Now!

OBAMA'S MEDDLING IN AMERICA'S ELECTION SHOULD BE THE REAL TARGET!

OBAMA'S MEDDLING IN AMERICA'S ELECTION SHOULD BE THE REAL TARGET!

You can scream and yell about what you believe, and what you believe the connection between Trump and the Russians might be, but when the truth hits you square in the face I would think it would be time to reevaluate your position, and reformat your bloviating based solely on the facts leading to that truth!

We just made it through 8 years of an attempted robbery of our Constitutional Republic way of life, and now, without our knowledge, being subjected to a continued version of the same by our elected Officials who decided to hijack, because of outside globalism interests, the once law abiding and respected Democratic Party of old. This new ‘Socialist Party’ a.k.a. Democratic Party, cheer for the continuation of a unconstitutional healthcare law that only hurts America’s law abiding taxpayers who are loyal to the rule of law and Constitution, but rewards the majority of noncontributing and illegal immigrants that don’t pay taxes, but live off Obama’s free stuff, while intentionally stifling the economy! Obama eased the work requirements to receive those entitlements’ which by the way is one of the eight Alinsky rules outlined in the transformation of America to Socialism, and by so, raising the National Debt, raising the poverty level, raising the number of people on Welfare, and getting one step closer to undermine our Constitutional Republic! 

I saw the following on the news over the last day or so, but now after flipping around the news networks I see nothing but the continuation of the Russian Influence Committee countdown to the hearings! My Question would be why, after reading and seeing the following information, would they continue with what they already know is a farce? If you look at this closely you will see the accusation of Russia influencing the election was known way before Trump was even elected President! There is no truth in the Trump administration involvement in the Russian meddling, and it seems as if the hidden intel retrieved by the Obama agencies before Trump took office was held as a backup plan in advance! Trump won the election, and now these intel Obamaites are trying to piece together and leaking facts, while laying out a false narrative to come up with a ‘Fake’ generated scenario, that fits a specific charge using interpretation, intent, and innuendos to cast a shadow over the Trump Administration! The real crime here is that it was the Obama Administration, and Obama's 17 Intel agencies, who were actually the ones who allowed this hacking by the Russians to interfere with the election, and warned way in advance of the 2016 Presidential election!

As I watch the opening statement of the committee on the Intel hearing on the Russian election meddling, I see that the juxtapositioning and time frame just happens to coincide with the Trump inauguration is just to convenient, and obviously targeted specifically at Trump and the will of the American people, and that’s my 6^th sense opinion.

My question to these elected hack ideologues would be, “Where is the investigation into the Meddling of America’s Constitutional Republic by Obama,” and his attempt to transform our Constitutional Republic to Socialism by bypassing the rule of law and our constitution, and using outside interests, like George Soros, supplying masked protestors, rioters, and anarchists, and bribing our Media to back their Alinsky and Cloward and Piven agenda to destroy America from within, and disrupt our political process and election, right here at home on America soil? 

Obama, Brennan, Clapper, already knew about the Russian meddling way before outsider nonpolitician Trump threw his hat in the ring, but used the opportunity and information, like J. Edgar Hoover did back in the 50’s, to undermine Trumps Presidency! The nation’s largest law enforcement agency rivals the NSA in resources, technology, intelligence, and power. Yet while the NSA has repeatedly come under fire for its domestic spying programs, the FBI has continued to operate its subversive and clearly unconstitutional programs with little significant oversight or push-back from the public, Congress or the courts. Just recently, for example, a secret court gave the agency the green light to quietly change its privacy rules for accessing NSA data on Americans’ international communications.

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION BLOCKED COMEY FROM REVEALING “RUSSIAN TAMPERING” BEFORE ELECTION!

The narrative of the "Russian hacking" of the US elections has been thrown for a loop following a report the Obama administration blocked FBI Director James Comey’s attempts to go public as early as the summer of 2016 with information on Russia’s alleged campaign to influence the U.S. presidential election, Newsweek reports citing two unidentified sources with knowledge of the matter. 

According to Newsweek, Comey pitched the idea of writing an op-ed about a Russian "interference" campaign during a meeting in the White House’s situation room in June or July 2016, well before the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence accused the Russian government of tampering with the U.S. election in an October 7 statement, the same day as Wikileaks started released the hacked Podesta emails, and the same day that the Trump's "grab her by the pussy" recording emerged.

“He had a draft of it or an outline. He held up a piece of paper in a meeting and said, ‘I want to go forward, what do people think of this?’” said a Newsweek source with knowledge of the meeting, which included Secretary of State John Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, the Department of Homeland Security’s director and the national security adviser.

However, the other national security leaders didn’t like the idea, and White House officials thought the announcement should be a coordinated message backed by multiple agencies. “An op-ed doesn’t have the same stature, it comes from one person.”

Newsweek notes that the op-ed would not have mentioned whether the FBI was investigating Donald Trump’s campaign workers or others close to him for links to the Russians’ interference in the election, perhaps because such an investigation did not start until later.

Comey would likely have tried to publish the op-ed in The New York Times, and it would have included much of the same information as the bombshell declassified intelligence report released January 6, which said Russian President Vladimir Putin tried to influence the presidential election, the source said.

What to make of this latest revelation: according to Newsweek, "for supporters of Hillary Clinton, news of the op-ed adds to the frustration over Comey’s public disclosure of details about the investigation into her emails, including at a July press conference, but not about the probe involving Russia and Trump, which began that same month."

Of course, it remains unclear how and if the election outcome would have changed had Comey published the report: recent reports have suggested that despite allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, nothing has been found. In other words, the best that Comey could reveal is that someone may have been trying to hack the DNC, and eventually, John Podesta. And yet, those hacks did nothing to change the actual voting process, they merely shed light on the illicit dealings within the Clinton campaign and the infighting within the DNC, which - as we now know - colluded both internally, with the press and with the Clinton campaign to prevent Bernie Sanders from becoming the Democratic presidential candidate.

In any event, the ball will now be in the Democrats' court, with fingers pointing right at the White House. That would be the Obama White House, for those who have lost track of the timeline.

"This raises a lot of questions,” says Jarad Geldner, a senior adviser for the Democratic Coalition Against Trump, which filed a complaint with the Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility over Comey’s disclosures about the Clinton investigation. “That raises the question of why Comey or [the Department of Justice] or the White House felt that it was OK to hold that [July] press conference on Hillary Clinton’s emails but not to go public with this.”

Worse, as Newsweek adds, it was a sluggish White House that denied Comey and delayed the announcement. “The White House shut it down,” that source says. “They did their usual—nothing.”

Of course, the biggest question raised is why did Obama block Comey in the first place. Or rather, make that rhetorical question.

While we doubt that Obama will suffer the Democrats' wrath as a result of this latest story, it will be sure to keep the "Russian hacking" narrative topical for at least a few more days, before yet another "Russia story" emerges, and then another, and so on, until hopefully one day the bipartisan Senate probe into alleged Russian meddling "gets to the bottom of this." ~~by Tyler Durden, a Friend of America!

FORMER OBAMA DEPUTY ASST. SEC DEF EVELYN FARKAS OUTS OBAMA'S ROLE IN THE RUSSIAN MEDDLING!

Former Obama Deputy Asst. Sec Def Evelyn Farkas made some stunning admissions during an interview with MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski back on Mar 3. While they were discussing the mad scramble by the Obama administration to collect and preserve intelligence on alleged Russian election-hacking before Obama left office, it appears that Evelyn Farkas accidentally implicated the Obama White House in the surveillance of Trump’s campaign staff, saying:

Click here to hear it>   STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSES MOUTH! 

The Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff dealing with Russians, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would no longer have access to that intelligence.

Farkas effectively corroborated a NYT article from the same day which cited “former Pindo boxtops” as its anonymous source regarding efforts to leak this surveillance on the Trump team to Demagogs across Faschingstein DC. She says:

"I became very worried, because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia. By then I had talked to some of my former colleagues, and I knew they were also trying to get information to the Hill. That’s why you have the leaking."

In other words, the Obama administration was concerned about spoliation of evidence gathered through various “sources and methods” of surveillance, so a plan was hatched to leak this information to congress, aka “the Hill.” On a related note, Evelyn Farkas is also a senior fellow at the vehemently anti-Russia Atlantic Council, along with Crowdstrike founder Dmitri Alperovitch. The Atlantic Council is funded by the State Dept., NATO, Latvia, Lithuania, and Ukrainian Oligarch Victor Pinchuk.

Click here>   WHAT'S WHAT AND THE BREAKDOWN OF THE 'WORDS THAT MATTER'

Agenda journalist and the 'Paid to Report' Media is still producing facts that hurt Americans, but seem not to care when they come up with 'Fake news' that claims entire Supreme Court bench opposes Neil Gorsuch's nomination!

A recent fake news story claimed each of the eight current Supreme Court justices signed a letter addressed to President Trump shaming his pick of Neil Gorsuch to the bench.

The claim from the Bipartisan Report -- which Snopes describes as "unreliable" -- came after the Supreme Court dissented in majority rule against a previously held court decision in which Gorsuch was involved.

An excerpt from the Bipartisan Report's article read as follows:

"In a move, no one saw coming, all eight Supreme Court Justices have turned their backs on Trump, rejecting his nominee to fill Antonin Scalia's empty seat. Until now, it was believed that Obama's pick, Merrick Garland, didn't stand a chance as Republicans held out on voting for the Justice until Obama was out of office."

This claim was disproved by Snopes, who states "The eight sitting SCOTUS justices didn't 'turn their backs on Trump,' they didn't 'reject his nominee,' they didn't 'agree that President Trump is completely wrong in choosing Neil Gorsuch,' nor did they write a 'letter' to that effect."

In reality, the Supreme Court ruled against a 2008 decision in the case Endrew F. vs. Douglas County School District. In the decision, Gorsuch ruled that a bare minimum standard of education was sufficient in order to meet Congress' mandate that U.S. students be given a "free appropriate public education."

Progressives could care less about anything or anyone,  and that's including their own constituency, and only care about their agenda of overthrowing our Republic! they are only concerned with how the end result justifies the means, and no matter what they'll lie, cheat, and use deception to make what they believe in is the only 'right' thing to believe in, and will do whatever it takes to get across the finish line! Why do all of these Progressive believe that it’s the government that is responsible for the expense to the taxpayer for illegal immigrants when it comes to room and board healthcare, education and spending money? Why aren’t the taxpayers, who live in these sanctuary cities, get a chance to vote before their Progressive leaders declare their community a Sanctuary City? Why doesn’t Federal Law apply to these progressive leaders in these communities, and why shouldn’t they receive the 5 years in prison for every illegal immigrant they harbor, like it would be for one their constituents? Why should the law abiding pro-constitutional citizens of these Sanctuary Cities have the Federal funds withheld because of their elected officials don’t believe in following the law, and as a result, possibly lose funds that could affect the safety and wellbeing of the citizenry of those same Sanctuary Cities? I have to believe that with all of the above in play, and if the people had a chance to vote, these self-imposed Sanctuary City status declared by Progressive leadership would be rejected!

PROGRESSIVE COMPASSION IS NOT ON AMERICA’S SIDE!

I debated a liberal commentator who complained that the problem with President Donald Trump's budget blueprint is that it lacks "compassion" for the poor, for children and for the disabled. This woman went on to ask me how I could defend a budget that would cut Meals on Wheels, after-school programs and special-education funding, because without the federal dollars, these vital services would go away.

This ideology -- that the government action is a sign of compassion -- is upside-down and contrary to the Christian notion of charity.

We all, as individuals, can and should act compassionately and charitably. We can volunteer our time, energy and dollars to help the underprivileged. We can feed the hungry, house the homeless. Most of us feel a moral and ethical responsibility to do so -- to "do unto others."

And we do fulfill that obligation more than the citizens of almost any other nation. International statistics show that Americans are the most charitable people in the world and the most likely to engage in volunteerism. Whenever there is an international crisis -- an earthquake, a flood, a war -- Americans provide more assistance than the people of any other nation.

But government, by its nature, is not compassionate. It can't be. It is nothing other than a force. Government can only spend a dollar to help someone when it forcibly takes a dollar from someone else. At its core, government welfare is predicated on a false compassion. This isn't to say that government should never take collective action to help people. But these actions are based on compulsion, not compassion.

If every so-called "patriotic millionaire" would simply donate half of their wealth to serving others we could solve so many of the social problems in this country without a penny of new debt or taxes. My friend Arthur Brooks, the president of American Enterprise Institute, has noted in his fabulous book "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism" that conservatives donate more than the self-proclaimed compassionate liberals.

The liberal creed seems to be: "We care so much about poor people, climate change, income inequality and protecting the environment (or whatever the cause of the day) that there is no limit to how much money should be taken out of other people's wallets to solve these problems."

Let's take Meals on Wheels. Is this a valuable program to get a nutritious lunch or dinner to infirmed senior citizens? Of course, yes. Do we need the government to fund it? Of course, not, I have participated in Meals on Wheels and other such programs, making sandwiches or delivering hot lunches. And many tens of thousands of others donate their time and money every day for this worthy cause.

Why is there any need for government here? The program works fine on its own. Turning this sort of charitable task over to government only makes people act less charitably on their own. It leads to an "I gave at the office" mentality, which leads to less generosity. It also subjects these programs to federal rules and regulations that could cripple the programs. Why must the federal government be funding after-school programs -- or any school programs, for that matter?

One of my favorite stories of American history dates back to the 19th century when Col. Davy Crockett, who fought at the Alamo, served in Congress. In a famous incident, Congress wanted to appropriate $100,000 to the widow of a distinguished naval officer. Crockett took to the House floor and delivered his famous speech, relevant as ever: "We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right to so appropriate a dollar of the public money. ... I am the poorest man on this floor. I cannot vote for this bill, but I will give one week's pay to the object, and if every member of Congress will do the same, it will amount to more than the bill asks."

Crockett was the only member of Congress who donated personally to the widow, while the members of Congress who pretended to be so caring and compassionate closed their wallets.

It all goes to show that liberal do-gooders were as hypocritical then as they are today. ~~ By Stephen Moore, a Friend of America!

 Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , Tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
Friends of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights. Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.

WE THE PEOPLE

TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! 

Join The Resistance and Share This Article Now!