UNIQUENESS, DIVERSITY, AND SELF-ACTUALIZATION ARE THE DIFFERENT PIECES OF THE WORLD PUZZLE, BUT ARE THEY REALLY?

By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and Friends of America!

UNIQUENESS, DIVERSITY, AND SELF-ACTUALIZATION ARE THE DIFFERENT PIECES OF THE WORLD PUZZLE, BUT ARE THEY REALLY?

Bad or negative history doesn't have to repeat itself, and with the technical abilities man has developed over the last 30 years, can be avoided, and at the very least exposed and eradicated before that cancer on our history past can rear it's ugly head again, and spread! 

I decided to catch an early movie yesterday, and saw ‘The Promise.’ For you that don’t know what this movie is about, just know it reminded me of what’s been going on in the world today, and not being reported on by the Media, and denied by the high-ranking officials of Turkey at the time during the early years of the 20^th century.

On the eve of World War I, there were two million Armenians in the declining Ottoman Empire. By 1922, there were fewer than 400,000. The others — some 1.5 million — were killed in what historians consider a genocide.

As David Fromkin put it in his widely-praised history of World War I and its aftermath, “A Peace to End All Peace”: “Rape and beating were commonplace. Those who were not killed at once were driven through mountains and deserts without food, drink or shelter. Hundreds of thousands of Armenians eventually succumbed or were killed.”

The man who invented the word “genocide”— Raphael Lemkin, a lawyer of Polish-Jewish origin — was moved to investigate the attempt to eliminate an entire people by accounts of the massacres of Armenians. He did not, however, coin the word until 1943, applying it to Nazi Germany and the Jews in a book published a year later, “Axis Rule in Occupied Europe.”

But to Turks, what happened in 1915 was, at most, just one messier piece of a very messy war that spelled the end of a once-powerful empire. They reject the conclusions of historians and the term genocide, saying there was no premeditation in the deaths, no systematic attempt to destroy a people. Indeed, in Turkey today it remains a crime — “insulting Turkishness” — to even raise the issue of what happened to the Armenians. ~~ By John Kifner, a Friend of America!

My point? We should be very concerned about the lack of honest reporting, and understand that it’s not the Russians that have the real influence over America’s freedoms, liberty, and future elections, but this bad penny that keeps turning up that goes by the name of George Soros! His Socialist ‘New’ world order is worldwide, and if we don’t do anything about his constant interfering here and around the world, then the only existence in the world will be that of a Socialist 3^rd world country that is ruled by a new world order oligarchy of the super-rich and their gestapo divvying up the rations and needed services to keep everyone under the thumb of their dictated freedoms and liberties, and not our own!

What we are not being told, and being discarded as lies by the progressive left is not something we want to look back on history upon, but realize it’s not too late to right the wrong before our constitutional republic is driven into extinction. We need to educate, through whatever way necessary to bring the real facts back to light, and prevent the ‘information’ pipeline from being blocked or altered to serve the progressive left through their misleading and fictitious accounts and sources, of what’s going on around the world, and right here on our ‘can’t happen here’ America soil!

The feckless leadership of the left are In what I would call panic mode, and going on with the ‘New’ excuse for the old bipartisan Democratic Party that believed in the rule of law, as written, and the respected banter and debate that use to be the way the political game used to be played.

What we have this weekend from the left is doubling down on the Russian plot influencing the  election for President Trump, Jonathan Gruber, the architect of Obamacare, who said that the American people were stupid and easily tricked when it came to passing the Affordable Care Act, but now blaming Trump for the failures of Obamacare! Both Alinskyites appeared on the stage of public opinion to celebrate and praise Frances’s EU’s, Globalist, and open border victory of the one outsider Macron, who like the other outsider, Le Pen, dethroned the existing status quo congressional ‘Swamp’ equivalent, just like President Trump did here in America during the last election!

The accusations leveled against the Republican House passed replacement for Obamacare, is almost laughable. First of all, Obamacare is the law of land, and will be until something changes legislatively, or it goes on its predicted path to collapse, which is what's happening right now. Nobody on the left has run under Obamacare’s successes when running for a political office for the first time, or looking to get reelected, but it has cost the Democratic Party over 1,000 seats in the political hierarchy throughout America for the last 8 years under Obama, and now choosing to use Obamacare to bash Republicans for attempting to erase Obama’s only signature legislative accomplishment, but not for the American people, but for the sake of this unconstitutional President’s legacy. Will France learn form these two outsider politicians with complete opposite views, like did outsider Trump and insider Hillary Clinton, or will it take the next 5 years to prove they made a huge mistake in electing Macron, only time will tell.  

France’s Le Pen and Macron basically didn’t exist on the political stage of France when this election cycle started, but ended up dominating the world news, and as a result, sparked the interest of all European countries because this could have ended up being the second possible country to leave the European Union after Britain did before. ~~

On a drab day this week outside the Whirlpool offices here, the union leader is seething about the Michigan-based company’s decision to close down the appliance factory and relocate to Poland. “Globalization means always more for the strong and less for the weak,” he says, as employees who will lose their jobs by next year file out from their morning shift. “We always have to tighten our belts. They don’t have a belt.”

Welcome to the “rust belt” of France, where blue collar workers, like their American counterparts in Michigan, or Pennsylvania and Ohio, are ripe for the “economic patriotism” of Marine Le Pen, the anti-EU, anti-immigrant candidate out front in French presidential elections.

Even in France, Western elections are being viewed through the prism of the 2016 race in America between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. And if Ms. Le Pen, buoyed by the despair and frustration of those left behind, is the Mr. Trump of the French election, the role of the globalist Mrs. Clinton falls to her chief rival, Emmanuel Macron, who hails from this former industrial city. Indeed, in the second presidential debate held last night, he stood out among his opponents by declaring outright that the European project is in his “heart.”

Macron’s message is more complicated than Le Pen’s. But he is trying to communicate that blue-collar workers would be worse off if Le Pen were successful in taking France out of the EU or the Eurozone. In contrast, he says Macron’s platform puts emphasis on retraining industrial workers.

“Macron thinks about globalization with a realistic view,” Mr. Williame says. “He says we should try to accompany the employees losing the jobs, rather than trying to save absolutely these jobs when the plants are closing.”

Macron's movement has faced much criticism for being out of touch with the rust belt, just like Clinton's was. Lex Paulson, a professor at SciencesPo who is a former organizer with the Obama campaign and now volunteers with Macron’s “En Marche” movement, disagrees. He says he sees in Macron's movement more in common with that of Obama, including drawing huge numbers of volunteers who'd never before been politically engaged. “Hillary Clinton goes to Ohio, and there is absolutely no way she positions herself as a candidate of change,” he says. “Emmanuel Macron is creating a change and a major disruption in the political system, the way Hillary Clinton was the opposite of.”

The “Macron phenomenon” has gotten wind from the collapse of the two parties that form the mainstream political establishment – neither of which is polling to make the runoff. While Macron draws voters from the right and left, transcending party lines, that platform can also make him appear unconvincing and thin on substance, especially with no party apparatus behind him.

As a candidate today, Macron is touting himself as post-ideological, with a platform that draws from the left and from the right. He wants more welfare for the worst-off, but he also wants to reduce public spending and keep France’s budget deficit under 3 percent, as mandated by the European Union. He wants to make it easier to start a business and says he can push unemployment from 10 percent, where it has hovered throughout President Hollande's term, down to 7 percent.

Webber says the outcome of the US presidential election – along with Brexit and the rise of populism across Europe – might shape the mood in favor of Macron. “I think the Brexit result in the UK and election of Trump in the US are having more of an integrative effect on the remainder on the EU than a disintegrative one,” he says. ~~By Sara Miller Llana, a Friend of America!

Le Pen said just one thing that sticks in my mind, and continues to contribute to the anxiety of the German people, and that’s “a woman will win this election in France, either it’s me, or its going to be the first female chancellor of Germany and one of the architects of the European Union, Angela Merkel.’

George Soros behind Merkel´s Refugees Chaos, Abolition of Germany´s Decency, and Fall of Schengen: The Germans need Shock Therapy for Disobedience to Its Master

Angela Merkel shows a unique tenacity in relation to Germany´s and thus Europe’s open borders – with catastrophic flooding by Muslim immigrants, of whom only 20% are war refugees.

Now, therefore, nation states are breaking down under the load and introduce border controls, because the EU has totally failed to protect us from the floods and the crimes that follow. Denmark, Sweden, Norway (and Finland) have had enough – and are closing their borders partially to migrants. This makes Schengen fall – and, in the long run, the EU also.

But more than that has disappeared by Merkel’s irresponsibility and callousness: decency and morality at state level. For years, Sweden tolerated an increase in rapes by 1472% – now the country can no longer bear it because of voter pressure. It now comes to light that the German government covered up the ongoing migrant crime wave in Germany for years by press and police censorship.

Merkel’s noticeable behavior coincides exactly with the strategy of Rothschild agent, George Soros. And no wonder:

Through the “Atlantic Bridge”, Bilderberger Angela Merkel is directly under the dictates of Rothschild´s / the Jesuits ‘US Council on Foreign Relations, the actual and undemocratic government of the United States. Soros is a CFR member – and founder of the European CFR.

Soros is angry with Germany because its Federal Bank and the Federal Court prevented the fiscal union that Soros (and therefore Rothschild) demanded: This Union would make Germany the paymaster for the irresponsible South European bust economies. Alternatively, Soros wanted to see Germany leave the euro. Merkel was very docile in this respect – but that was not enough.

What makes Soros angry is that Germany has made the EU a “not-open society” – but by the lack of a fiscal union a closed society, instead – where he can no longer milk the countries of southern Europe by means of German money flows.

If you defy Rothschild / Soros, you have to be punished. Soros now sees the EU already disbanded – and blames it on Germany. He says it´s a nightmare!!

He sees only one way: to submit the Germans to a shock treatment – so that they will be crying out for EU dictatorship.

As I described earlier, Soros has organized the refugee masses (an industry with 1.2 million employees) and pays the fare of migrants to Europe.

This is now his shock treatment.

Now Soros / Rothschild have this plan for Europe: “To be a part of the European Union, means that you have to renounce on your national identity to be part of everybody. It is no longer acceptable to be yourself “. (And this is meant as an order!)

Now he is achieving this by his alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood, which for years has a detailed plan for the Islamization of Europe. This plan has been known for years by the EU Commission – and is now implemented by it and Merkel. ~~ 
SO, AS THE WORLD GOES SO DOES AMERICA, AND 'PROGRESSIVELY' LOSING OUR FREEDOMS AND LIBERTIES! 

Winning elections is important, sure. But so is control of the streets. So is protecting the continued free exchange of ideas.

On college campuses, so-called “progressives” routinely dub speakers they dislike “fascists.” The former head of the Democratic National Committee now claims the horrifying things these “fascists” say qualify as “hate speech,” which falls outside First Amendment protection. Apparently, the new theory goes, what falls inside constitutional protection are the threats and acts of violence that “anti-fascists” wield both against the speakers as well as those coming to listen.

The old theory of the First Amendment — the one called “liberal,” interestingly enough, when I was young — has it that the Constitutional provision isn’t necessary to protect widely popular ideas, but, instead, to allow the free expression of ideas that inflame, even.

Yet, these mob attacks are not targeting speech that enrages the public as a whole. If they were, where are the Marxist, socialist or communist orators whose talks have faced violence and shouts of “shut it down”? No, even with the last century’s 94 million victims of communism buried in their graves, this sick political idea remains protected by its opponents’ respect for free speech.

On the other hand, upset a militant sliver of the left with an always-teetering chip on their shoulders and watch a conflagration ensue.

Neither Milo Yiannopoulos nor Ann Coulter speaks for the majority of Americans or even necessarily a majority of all conservatives, but neither do their ideas appeal only to the fringes of political thought. Nor do conservatives or libertarians universally agree with every theory or analysis produced by social scientist Charles Murray, author Heather Mac Donald, commentator Ben Shapiro or others who have been banned, shouted down, blocked by threats, roughed up and even sent to the hospital. But their ideas are serious and do find a great deal of support.

After her address at Claremont McKenna College was shut down, Mac Donald rightly called it “an exercise of brute totalitarian force.” The fascists are the violent, speech-stompers on the far left, who call themselves “anti-fascists” . . . without recognizing even a hint of irony.

The goal of the guillotine-esque gauntlet now fashionable on university campuses is simple and obvious: silence the expressions of views incompatible with their own, meaning conservative and libertarian views.

Nonetheless, while most Americans, including most liberals, find the violence against conservative speakers to be beyond the pale, our nation’s largest circulation newspapers have begun to call many of these disfavored speakers “provocateurs” — meaning “one who provokes.” This label in news reports serves to subtly shift responsibility for the disturbances to the speaker, rather than the violent, black-masked thugs who pepper-spray and beat their opponents down in the street, smash windows, set fires and destroy property.

The leftwing bias on university campuses has long been known, of course. Nearly 40 years ago, as a freshman at Westminster College — where Winston Churchill had delivered his famous “Iron Curtain” speech, warning of the danger of communism — most of my professors were socialists, Marxists and communists.

Since then, academia has done the seemingly impossible: moved further to the left. By all reports, this bias now affects not only which outside speakers might address students, but what students feel safe in staying on campus and in class and even writing in their papers — graded by the equivalent of the Gang of Four (the communists, not the band).

And with the success that violent suppression of speech has met thus far, expect things to get much worse. Already, the campaign to shut down “non-progressive” speech has metastasized beyond the leftist province of higher education.

Last week, the people of Portland, Oregon, celebrated their Rose Festival . . . well, within limits. And those limits were imposed by the threat of force from vigilantes on the left acting brazenly and publicly.

“The annual 82nd Avenue Rose Parade and Carnival scheduled for Saturday have been canceled because of threats against the Multnomah County Republican Party, a longtime participant in the parade,” the Portland Tribune reported. “In a Tuesday afternoon email, the 82 Avenue Business Association, which sponsors the Rose Festival-sanctioned event, said it canceled the entire event because [it] could not guarantee the safety of the community.”

The threats of violence came from the Direct-Action Alliance, an “antifa”-styled group that “created a Facebook event called ‘Defend Portland from Fascists at the Avenue of Roses Parade.’ The group wanted to disrupt the march because of ‘Nazis and fascists’ participating.”

By “Nazis and fascists,” they mean you!

When members of one of the two major parties cannot march in a public parade because of the supposed inability of local police to prevent the threatened carnage on the streets, if they do, the issue of political violence ought to become more paramount.

“This is nuts,” said Fox News’s Greg Gutfeld last week. “What we’re seeing is the first anti-free speech movement. And it’s from the progressive punitive mob coddled for decades by the media, entertainment industry and government. On campuses and their towns, the American flag is slowly being replaced with a white one. Speeches, now parades, what’s next?”

Speak now or forever hold your tongue. ~~Paul Jacob, a Friend of America!

Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , Tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks. 
Friends of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights. Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.

WE THE PEOPLE

TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!