THE TAIL’S BEEN WAGGING THE DOG EVER SINCE OBAMA TOOK OFFICE BACK IN 2009, AND AMERICA HAS, AND CONTINUES TO PAY THE PRICE!!
Russian’s hacked America's election, a video caused the 4 deaths of Americans
in Benghazi, Wikileaks revelations and truth about the DNC’s traitorous actions
and disrespect towards the ‘Will’ of the American people got Trump elected,
Americans are being told who we are, and who we are not when it comes to opening
our borders and not accepting every unvetted illegal immigrant and refugee that doesn't believe in our laws and Christian beliefs, Hillary won the
popular vote,
but not before the 13+ million illegals were not only encouraged to vote
illegally, but encouraged to do so the sitting President of the United States
of America, Barack Obama, and in states where there is no voter ID requirements, and
where people vote multiple times. If you
take California and New York out of the mix, then Trump wins the popular vote
easily!
Oh, before I go on let’s check out what is ‘The tail wagging
the dog’: A minor or secondary part of something controlling or dominating the
whole or the main part!
I know you’ve heard the term ‘The Tail Wagging the Dog’
before, but if you haven’t figured it out yet, know that the ‘Will’ of the
people have been the dog all along! Every little detour and speedbump that the
‘Paid to Report’ Media could throw at you to distract you from the facts and
agenda of the Progressive left, and their effort to shield Hillary Clinton from
the truth of her traitorous actions against America, and her overwhelming dash
for cash at the expense of women’s rights, and her very own platform!
Diversion tactics, deception, and just plain lying are synonyms for 'the tail wagging the dog',
and by adding personal character flaws into the mix you have a delusional Obama doubling down on his perceived accomplishments and triumphs, which by the way, are all part of the strategy. Obama is the king of the ‘tail,’ and
has used it more times than any other President in history!
Before we can empty our ‘metaphorical’ guns into the silver
tonged ‘out the door’ Socialist leader of the left, we must also take aim at
the ’Paid to Report’ Media who are stroking that same “tail’ and probably in
cahoots with the man behind the curtain, George Soros!
When it comes to the ‘Paid to Report’ Media and exchanging truth in reporting in lieu of rankings and profits, the journalistic
Hippocratic Oath is bypassed, and like Obama did with our constitution, is why the American people aren't getting the information they need to make a rational decision before coming up with the right candidate to help America's future survive and flourish!
Journalism’s primary purpose is to hold power to account.
This purpose has been perfectly inverted. Columnists and bloggers are employed
as the enforcers of corporate power, denouncing people who criticize its
interests, bullying the powerless. The press barons allowed governments
occasionally to promote the interests of the poor, but never to hamper the
interests of the rich. They also sought to discipline the rest of the media.
The BBC, over the past 30 years, became a shadow of the gutsy broadcaster it
was, and now treats big business with cringing deference. Every morning at
6.15, the Today programme’s business report grants executives the kind of
unchallenged access otherwise reserved for God on Thought for the Day. The rest
of the programme seeks out controversy and sets up discussions between
opponents, but these people are not confronted by their critics.
So, what can be done? Because of the peculiar threat, they
present to democracy, there’s a case to be made for breaking up all majority
interests in media companies, and for a board of governors, appointed perhaps
by Commons committee, to act as a counterweight to the shareholders’ business
interests. But even if that’s a workable idea, it’s a long way off. For now,
the best hope might be to mobilize readers to demand that journalists answer to
them, not just their proprietors. One means of doing this is to lobby
journalists to commit themselves to a kind of Hippocratic Oath. Here’s a rough
stab at a first draft. I hope others can improve it. Ideally, I’d like to see the
National Union of Journalists encouraging its members to sign.
‘Our primary task is to hold power to account. We will
prioritize those stories and issues which expose the interests of power. We
will be wary of the relationships we form with the rich and powerful, and
ensure that we don’t become embedded in their
society. We will not curry favor
with politicians, businesses or other dominant groups by withholding scrutiny
of their affairs, or twisting a story to suit their interests.
“We will stand up to the interests of the businesses we work
for, and the advertisers which fund them. We will never take money for
promulgating a particular opinion.
“We will recognize and understand the power we wield and how
it originates. We will challenge ourselves and our perception of the world as
much as we challenge other people. When we turn out to be wrong, we will say
so.” ~~ By George Monbiot, a Friend of America!
Obama’s perception of his self-promoting Legacy has nothing
to do with reality, but an outright attempt to resurrect his failed feckless
presidential policies and socialist agenda! Obama, along with his fellow loser,
Alinskyite Hillary, attempted to hijack the common sense of Americans through
the progressive left’s politically correct and implicit bias rhetoric, and trying to adjust
the mindset of who we are, and who we are not based on the intent and
interpretation that they used to eliminate and change America’s perception and
definition of exceptionalism, which is what America is, and always will be!
I guess it’s time to get back to the point, and that’s ‘The
tail wagging the dog,’ and the number of times American’s fell for the BS, and
what the ‘Paid to Report’ Media decided to run with in their attempt to keep
the first Black, Muslim over America sympathizer, ‘Red Line Liar’ and not a
‘Natural Born’ Citizen which would of prevented him from even being president,
out of the way of the truth and his agenda of deception and divisiveness to
accomplish his global agenda! ~~
Damn lies ratchet up the immorality quotient, and are what
Obama specializes in when he actually knows what he’s doing. They’re concocted
to protect a political future or ram through
unpopular legislation under the
guise that “If you like your health-care plan, you can keep it." There’s a
problem: millions of Americans with
health plans that didn't meet Obamacare’s standards got cancellation notices.
Devised to make palatable a vast redistribution of wealth,
it rightfully earned Obama the lie of the year award. This was a damn lie he
knew wasn’t true to help foist unpopular legislation on a skeptical public
amidst all manner of corrupt wheeling and dealings. Every other major piece of
social legislation in our history, including Social Security and Civil Rights,
has enjoyed some bipartisan support, but not ObamaCare. At least Obama knew
this damn lie wasn’t true, and there’s some Machiavellian comfort in that when
we consider his delusional fiascoes.
Obama Lies:
There are worse lies -- Obama lies, and they replicate when
he doesn’t know what he’s doing. Since that’s most of the time, they’re quite
plentiful. They’re repeated so often and are so deeply enmeshed in a contorted
concoction of sophistry that they literally supplant reality. These pernicious
things riddle Obama and distort his perceptions. Whereas many presidential lies
protect us; Obama lies are protecting our enemies: ISIS marches on; Iran gets
closer to the bomb as Obama rejects calls for more sanctions.
Obama lies are insidious because they wriggle their slimy
way through his delicate psyche, untethering him from the vast world beyond
self or golf course. When reality dare intrudes into his bubble of self-deceit
it elicits cognitive dissonance, prompting his auto defense mechanisms to blast
the interlopers as phony, or blame it on hyperbolic social media. Meanwhile,
ISIS marches on, Iran gets closer to the big one, and the real interloper is
our supposed Commander-in-Chief.
Obama lies are an outgrowth of what French philosopher
Jean-Paul Sartre called “bad faith,” in which he not only deceives others, but
also himself. In essence, he is choosing to not be free, but engulfed in bad
faith. Over time, the habit of lying “divorces [Obama] further and further from
reality, so [he] see less and less clearly the choices before [him] and what is
at stake in them. Eventually, [he] may be unable to see what [he’s] really
doing and how it is affecting others.”
This is not abstract philosophical rumination, just consider
his bizarre State of the Union address, which had the remarkable effect of
eliciting bi-partisan unity: Obama is delusional on foreign policy. Obama
bizarrely claimed that ISIS is on the defensive, but it soon reached the
periphery of Ain al-Asad air base in Anbar Province which houses about 320
marines. And they certainly weren’t on the defensive when they captured the
western Iraqi town of al-Baghdadi.
Once deemed a JV team during a reckless “bad faith” episode,
ISIS now has strongholds in Iraq and Syria, and has promised to "break the
borders" of Jordan and Lebanon and to "free Palestine". In a
gut-wrenching act of barbarism that would make anyone with a developed
conscience shudder, ISIS massacred 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians in Libya. An
executioner pointed his knife toward the Mediterranean and said “We will
conquer Rome, by Allah’s permission.” Perhaps I’ve too much good faith, but
that’s not defensive. Neither is it violent extremism -- its Islamic Terrorism!
Nevertheless, subsumed by Obama lies the White House couldn’t bring itself to
recognize the victims were actually Christians, and the brutal slayers invoked
Allah. They really, really did, Mr. Liar-in-Chief.
Meanwhile, during years of futile negotiations, Iran
continues to advance its nuclear capabilities. Despite bipartisan support for
sanctions to ensure Iran’s good faith, Obama, forever deluded in bad faith,
claims they’ll undermine the Sisyphean process. That’s peculiar, but then Obama
lies have a way of eviscerating common sense. Economic pressure is why the
Iranian regime even goes through the motions of negotiating, take them off the
table and they’ll leave the table.
The evidence is there for anyone free of Obama’s
pathological predisposition: ISIS marches on, Iran gets closer to the big one.
Better go play a round of golf.
Obama looks through a myopic mask of delusion that has
melded into the contorted face of
narcissism, endangering us all in his tangled
web of deceit. He may well want to give terrorists jobs instead of killing
them, but he’s a negligent commander-in-chief, descending into rabid solipsism
that denies the world is alight in Islamic Terrorism. Islamic, I said.
I’ll take statistics over Obama lies any day. ~~By Noel S. Williams, a Friend of America!
Click here > OBAMA'S TOP 20 PINOCCHIO'S!
AND THE OBAMA BEAT GOES ON, AND ON, AND ON………!
A last-ditch effort for President Obama to try and punch
Merrick Garland through to the Supreme Court to replace the late Justice
Antonin Scalia is unlikely.
A new Congress starts at noon Tuesday and there’s no active
chatter that the Obama administration has anything in the works or is even
contemplating a bizarre, extra-Constitutional power play. If nothing else, the
concept is gaining attention in various legal, parliamentary and journalistic
salons.
There will be a five-minute window between when the 114th
Congress adjourns and when the 115th Congress convenes. This little window of
opportunity could give Obama the
unprecedented opportunity to make an
“intersession recess appointment,” bypass the traditional confirmation process
and install Garland on the Supreme Court.
In 2014, the High Court ruled that the executive branch of
government can’t tell the legislative branch of government what it believes
constitutes a “Congressional recess.” However, it’s clear that Congress is out
of session between the 114th and 115th Congresses.
President Teddy Roosevelt seized the short period between
the two Congresses to make 168 appointments to various executive branch and
judicial posts – widely viewed as a remarkable power grab.
The possibility of a Roosevelt-esque power play would be
seen as foolish from a strategic standpoint, according to one Senate GOP
leadership aide.
"They would trade a short-term on SCOTUS, for a
full-time, lifetime tenured seat on the DC Circuit. And that's assuming that
SCOTUS would let it stand,” the aide told Fox News.
That’s a reference to the fact that recess appointments only
last for a short period. Whereas, Garland is currently serving on arguably the
most important court, save for the Supreme Court. And it is a lifetime
opportunity – unless Garland were to give it up for a chance on the higher
court for a couple years. In other words, as a “recess appointment,” Garland
would have to face Senate confirmation at some point.
Also, incoming Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY,
is a dealmaker. He has to work with
the GOP majority. Schumer must also protect
vulnerable Senate Democrats facing tough reelections this year. If the
Democrats pull the Garland trick, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell would
shut off the tap to the Democrats.
A stunt like this with Garland would be the “thermonuclear
option.”
Additionally, a move like this is something that no one on
Capitol Hill is talking about. It’s just not a topic of conversation. For their
part, Senate Democrats are busy girding for heating confirmation battles as
President-elect Trump prepares to take office.
As for the legal ramifications, while there are experts who
say such an "intersession" recess appointment could be legal, it's
still quite arguable.
Look back at the 2014 Supreme Court decision on recess
appointments.
The High Court struck down a series of Obama appointments to
the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). It was a victory for the Senate GOP
which brought the case.
As a result, the Republican-run Senate has been very careful
to hold "pro-forma" sessions every few days (where the Senate
literally gavels in and gavels out after 20 to 30 seconds) to leave no gap
under which a recess appointment could be valid. The NLRB case indicated that
only if the Senate were gone for more than ten days could an administration
consider the Senate as being "on recess." Thus, only then would a
"recess appointment" be in order.
That said, the Supreme Court's NLRB decision left a murky
area when it comes to the brief period in between sessions of Congress.
Regardless, the appointment would be challenged and tied up in the courts. By Chad
Pergram and Kara Rowland, Friends of America!
JUDGE GARLAND AND THE LEFT’S DISDAIN FOR TRUTH!!
By their own accounts, the liberal media lied in describing
Garland as a centrist.
And the more research one does, the bigger this lie appears.
The mainstream media — that is, the liberal media — share
all the views and characteristics of the left. Among these is the left’s view
of truth. There are honest individuals with left-wing views,
and dishonest
individuals on the right. But truth is not a leftist value. Everything the left
believes
in is more important than truth: social justice, economic equality,
reducing carbon emissions, expanding the power of the state, battling sexism,
homophobia, Islamophobia, racism, and above these, destroying its conservative
opposition.
The media’s coverage of President Barack Obama’s nomination
of Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court should serve as one of the most
blatant examples of both the left-wing orientation of the news media and their
willingness to play with truth.
On March 16, the day after Garland’s nomination, every major
mainstream news outlet, both print and electronic, depicted the judge as a
centrist.
The first sentence of The New York Times front page read:
“WASHINGTON — President Obama on Wednesday nominated Merrick B. Garland to be
the nation’s 113th Supreme Court justice, choosing a centrist appellate judge.”
Similarly, the Los Angeles Times front-page headline said:
“Obama’s choice of popular centrist Merrick Garland for Supreme Court puts GOP
to the test.”
Another headline, seen in the Washington Post, read:
“Merrick Garland’s instinct for the middle could put him in the court’s most
influential spot.” That same day, the Post published a second article
mentioning how “Garland’s deep resume and centrist reputation appear to have
positioned him well to earn the president’s nod.”
Two days later, the Los Angeles Times featured a news
analysis on its front page, in which a reporter wrote that Garland may be “the
most moderate Supreme Court nominee anyone could expect from a Democratic
president.” The reporter also calls Garland “a superbly qualified judge with a
cautious, centrist record.”
There is no truth to any of these reports — something easily
proved by both Judge Garland’s decisions and, amazingly, by the newspapers’
reports themselves.
Take the Los Angeles Times’ front-page “news analysis,” for
example. After describing the judge as a moderate and centrist, the LA Times
reporter writes:
“If the late Justice Antonin Scalia, a staunch conservative,
is replaced by a moderate-to-liberal Justice Garland, the court would tip to
the left on several key issues, like abortion, affirmative action, the death
penalty, gun control, campaign spending, immigration and environmental
protection.”
In other words, the very same author who describes Garland
as a centrist believes that Garland votes left on essentially every major issue
confronting the nation and the Supreme Court.
Additionally, that very same day The New York Times
headlined that Garland is a centrist, it published an article on the nomination
noting that “If Judge Garland is confirmed, he could tip the ideological
balance to create the most liberal Supreme Court in 50 years.”
In reviewing Garland’s decisions, this Times piece placed
Judge Garland to the left of Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, way to the left
of Justice Stephen Breyer and minimally to the right of Justices Sotomayor and
Ginsburg.
By their own accounts, the liberal media lied in describing
Garland as a centrist.
And the more research one does, the bigger this lie appears.
In a column in The Wall Street Journal, Juanita Duggan,
President and CEO of the National Federation of Independent Business, wrote
that Garland is so anti-small business and so pro-big labor, that “This is the
first time in the NFIB’s 73-year-history that we will weigh in on a Supreme
Court nominee.”
What worries the NFIB, she explains, is that “in 16 major
labor decisions of Judge Garland’s that we examined, he ruled 16-0 in favor of
the NLRB (National Labor Relations Board).”
Tom Goldstein wrote in the SCOTUSblog that Garland favors
deferring to the decision-makers in agencies. “In a dozen close cases in which
the court divided, he sided with the agency every time.”
Another source reads that “Judge Garland would be a reliable
fifth vote on these legal issues.”
Those are all the fundamental issues that divide the left
from the right.
So, the entire left is lying about Judge Garland, who, for
the record, seems like a truly decent man who possesses a first-class mind.
They do so because getting a fifth left-wing vote and weakening the Republicans
is far more important than truth.
Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
I think you nailed it again.
ReplyDelete