By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and Friends of America!
I-N-T-E-L, I-N-T-E-L, I-N-T-E-L, AND BULL SHIT IS ITS NAME -O!
I-N-T-E-L, I-N-T-E-L, I-N-T-E-L, AND BULL SHIT IS ITS NAME -O!
16 HOURS AGO!- Where is the Intel on with Iran receiving a
huge shipment of natural uranium from Russia to compensate it for exporting
tons of reactor coolant, diplomats say, in a move approved by the outgoing US
administration and other governments seeking to keep Tehran committed to a
landmark nuclear pact.
Two senior diplomats said the transfer recently agreed by
the US and five other world powers that negotiated the nuclear deal with Iran
foresees delivery of 116 metric tons (nearly 130 tons) of natural uranium. UN
Security Council approval is needed but a
formality, considering five of those
powers are permanent
Security Council members……didn’t Hillary broker that uranium deal with Russia back in her Secretary of State years, and with all of the oversight being supplied by the United Nations?
Security Council members……didn’t Hillary broker that uranium deal with Russia back in her Secretary of State years, and with all of the oversight being supplied by the United Nations?
OBAMA’S 8 YEAR HIDDEN AGENDA EXPOSED IN 5, EASY TO FOLLOW,
COMMON SENSE CHAPTERS!
Where was the intel of the intel’s intel, and more
importantly, what do they know that the American people don’t?
Where was the Intel on the video that caused the deaths of
Four American Patriots in Benghazi when in reality it was Hillary’s and our
‘see nothing do nothing’ sitting President Barack Obama’s running guns for
Hillary Clinton’s campaign to back the rebels in Syria, A.K.A. ISIS/ISIL!
Where was the true Intel that would have saved the families
from more grief when Hillary lied about the cause of their deaths
being a video, AND THEN TOLD THEM SO, AND THEN RECINDING AND CALLING THEM ALL LIARS!
Where was the Intel on Obama’s Red line ultimatums in Syria
against Assad, and the consequences of what would happen if America didn’t live
up to our promise to the Syrian People? Why didn’t the intel, after already
dropping gas on their own people, wouldn't think 500,000 innocent men, women
and children would be slaughtered as a result of Obama’s cowardice betrayal to America’s
word and promise?
Where was the Intel when Obama’s first term campaign team
went in and spent $350,000 to undermine Netanyahu’s reelection bid to remain
Prime Minister of Israel?
Where was the Intel on the Clinton Foundation’s ‘Pay to
Play’ scheme to undermine our constitution? Where was the Intel on Hillary's unprotected server giving access to America’s Top Secrets to the
highest bidder, and then blaming the Russians after getting caught
with their hand in the proverbial cookie jar? When it comes to the truth I’m
all for hacking our own Intel's Intel,
and that's because truth, like words, matter, and if the 'Paid to Report' Media is not delivering, then I'm perfectly fine taking matters into my own hands, and doing a little research! This false premise comes from Alinskyite twins who believe that the American people aren’t capable of thinking for themselves or know what they’re doing, and that’s according to the ‘Obama knows best’ administration and his number one fan Hillary Clinton!
and that's because truth, like words, matter, and if the 'Paid to Report' Media is not delivering, then I'm perfectly fine taking matters into my own hands, and doing a little research! This false premise comes from Alinskyite twins who believe that the American people aren’t capable of thinking for themselves or know what they’re doing, and that’s according to the ‘Obama knows best’ administration and his number one fan Hillary Clinton!
Where was the Intel on George Soros backing “Black Lives
Matter’ to interrupt, protest, and riot at Trump rallies, but not considered interfering with
our election process, and then where's the Intel on 307 voting districts in 16 swing
states where George Soros’s voting machines were being used in last November’s
election after a voter fraud claim during the primaries was leveled at Soros's machine?
Where’s the Intel on the 13+ million unvetted illegal
immigrants and refugees who are in America, who won’t assimilate, won’t follow our
laws while using their own, won’t respect our faith based Christian founder’s beliefs?
Where was the Intel and vetting on Obama’s
ability to run for the
President of the United States of America when he would have been blocked by our constitutional citizenship requirement to be President?
President of the United States of America when he would have been blocked by our constitutional citizenship requirement to be President?
I could continue on but think that’s enough for now,
but what you should know is that for the past 8 years of the Obama
administration there has been more definitions for the word ‘Intel’ then there
have been for the number of hacks by Russians on our Federal Agencies. The latest, and most recent definition goes something like this:
Whatever will be, will be, but whatever is the most important Intelligence (Intel) being received to protect the American people will ‘ONLY’ be acknowledged if it is important to Obama and his plans for transforming America! ~~
Whatever will be, will be, but whatever is the most important Intelligence (Intel) being received to protect the American people will ‘ONLY’ be acknowledged if it is important to Obama and his plans for transforming America! ~~
When I’m not doing my thing politically, and using my common
sense to expose the goings on behind the Progressive's attempt to undermine what
got us here, the Constitution, I go to the movies! The reason I jumped into the
blogging world was not for the nonexistent money or recognition, but because Facebook suspended
me under the guise of supposedly posting too much. After 2 straight, 2 week
stints on the bench within a 5 week span I decided, after the prompting and
some outside help, to join the ‘Friends of Liberty’ Group! This happened right
before the New York Primary and then again 2 weeks later…. FB decided, and came up with the idea to
send me a warning message when I got to around 30 posts, and I would stop posting,
wait about an hour or two, then continued until I hit that 30-message limit, warned again,
and stopped again. This went on for 6 months and we both seemed to be in sync with the arrangement,
but 4 days before the election the warning message didn’t appear, and I was
bumped again for 2 weeks! ~~
It’s apparent to me that Trump’s victory has exposed Hollywood’s
elitist top one percenters rage and disdain for anyone who doesn't see things the way they perceive reality! they seem to have forgotten where their bread
has been
buttered for years, where their dreams became true, and why some, who were not already citizens of this Great and cheaper taxed country than where they came from, decided to move in, become citizens, and make America their home!
buttered for years, where their dreams became true, and why some, who were not already citizens of this Great and cheaper taxed country than where they came from, decided to move in, become citizens, and make America their home!
I guess achieving the American Dream by starting from
scratch, eating hand to mouth, building a business, scrimping to get by, and
trying to navigate the Obama landmines and obstacles that Obamacare required
mandates imposed to hopefully make all Americans depend on, and live by
government rules and directives, are what Hollywood’s elitist don’t understand,
and snub their noses at!
There are more people out of the workforce in history, more
poverty in history, more people on welfare in History, more government
supported unvetted illegal immigrants and refugees who are illegally voting at
the encouragement of a sitting President in history!
I witnessed a parade of ‘haves’ while watching the ‘Golden
Globes’ last night. I witnessed the parading billboards of gowns that cost more
than ‘have not's make in a year, I witnessed the
outright disdain for America’s values and Constitution, I witnessed another media venue being used for an elitist ‘Bully Pulpit’ to express their first amendment rights while at the same time taking down what gave them those rights, and last but not least I witnessed the gathering of gawking minions who think these people’s shit doesn’t stink!
outright disdain for America’s values and Constitution, I witnessed another media venue being used for an elitist ‘Bully Pulpit’ to express their first amendment rights while at the same time taking down what gave them those rights, and last but not least I witnessed the gathering of gawking minions who think these people’s shit doesn’t stink!
One of Meryl’s blubbering moments came when she was
recounting the time Trump was mocking a handicapped reporter, but I guess
nobody told her that the teleprompter was spewing the same ‘Fake News’ that the
Progressive left have been dishing out since Obama first took office back in 2009! I
guess she forgot her lines, and missed the plot and ‘real’ story:
You’ve seen it repeated time and time again on TV ads for
Hillary Clinton — the claim that Donald Trump mocked a reporter’s disability.
But it’s all a lie — or should we say another lie.
The ads show Trump making spastic movements as he talks
about New York Times investigative reporter Serge Kovaleski, who suffers from a
congenital condition called arthrogryposis.
And the ads have spawned heaps of hate on social media such
as this:
There’s only one problem. Although arthrogryposis causes
restricted joint movement, it does not cause spasms, Catholics 4 Trump
reported.
As it turns out, that’s how Trump has described other people
as well. Here he was describing his closest Republican rival for the nomination,
Sen. Ted Cruz, who suffers from no disability whatsoever.
Look familiar? Therefore, while Clinton’s ads will depict
Trump
making spastic movements when he describes the reporter, they will never depict the reporter himself except in still shots like the one in the tweet above, because he doesn’t suffer from spasms.
making spastic movements when he describes the reporter, they will never depict the reporter himself except in still shots like the one in the tweet above, because he doesn’t suffer from spasms.
The brouhaha began when Trump claimed that a large number of
people in New Jersey cheered when the World Trade Center’s twin towers toppled
on 9/11. As proof, he referred to an article Kovaleski had written when he was
with The Washington Post:
In Jersey City, within hours of two jetliners’ plowing into
the World Trade Center, law enforcement authorities detained and questioned a
number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding
tailgate-style parties on rooftops while they watched the devastation on the
other side of the river. I have to say after watching 911 unfold on TV and living in New Jersey right across the Hudson River, I, with my wife at the time, also saw on TV what Trump said he saw when referring to the celebrations being held in Jersey City. Were there thousands, I don't know, but the video showed celebrations!
When asked about it later, Kovaleski claimed he couldn’t
remember it — and he didn’t flail his arms when he did so. Here he is as proof.
When the media pounced on Trump for “mocking” Kovaleski, the
Republican candidate claimed he’d never even met the man to the best of his
recollection, and therefore couldn’t mock a condition of which he lacked no
knowledge. Not to mention a condition that doesn’t include spasms.
But it doesn’t end there!
Upon further digging Catholics 4 Trump unearthed even more
footage from the same rally, where Trump later used the same mannerisms to mock
a non-disabled general.
“Oh, ISIS is very tough,” Trump said while flailing his
arms!
An odd form of communication perhaps, but making fun of the
disabled? Clearly not.
Trump supporter Ann Coulter got wind of the report and
wholeheartedly agreed:
Perhaps Trump is not a subtle actor, but he’s utterly
innocent of making fun of a disabled person.
Now consider the media’s role in manufacturing, and then
protecting, this lie. Reporters were at Trump’s speech. They were filming it.
They saw him do the identical imitation of a general during that same speech.
The media knew damn well that Trump does the arm-waving
routine whenever he’s pretending to be a flustered person. But they never
allowed the public to see the clip of Trump doing the same imitation of a
general.
That is proof that the ‘Paid to Report’ Media knew they were
lying, and will continue to do so, especially when it comes to ratings and profits!! ~~By Michael Dorstewitz, a Friend of America!
lying, and will continue to do so, especially when it comes to ratings and profits!! ~~By Michael Dorstewitz, a Friend of America!
The new color of the ‘bone of contention’ is green and no
longer the second place’s jointly shared black or white! The Obama
administration’s rejection of the gray area, where compromise and inclusion
lives and thrives, never had a chance because of Obama’s use of that ‘Pen and
Phone’ when he didn’t get his way!
I guess Creating wealth, creating jobs, providing for you family, busting you balls to get ahead in life, and achieving self-actualization and success, is now considered taboo!
I guess Creating wealth, creating jobs, providing for you family, busting you balls to get ahead in life, and achieving self-actualization and success, is now considered taboo!
The Progressive left doesn’t want to help dig out America
from its financial woes, and never did! They think that America, like all
other 3rd world countries, needs to be told how to live their lives,
what to believe religiously, and where you stand in the scheme of things
when attempting to making your way through life’s challenges! They never gave a
shit about making America great again because the American People wouldn’t
need their futures to be dependent on Obama like over inflated third world bureaucracy!
I guess there is another double standard going on here, and now
can be added to that existing pile of elitist’s double standards. Number #1
would be enforcing the same laws that all American’s live by, but not being
applied to our elected officials, or our sitting President, Barack Obama! Number
#2 would be how ‘FAKE NEWS’ is just a one-way street, and that one-way street
doesn’t include any of the promises and ideological changes to America that
Obama said he would accomplish. #3 would be Obama’s “if you like your doctor,
you can keep you doctor,” and his famous “if you like your Healthcare Plan, you
can keep your Healthcare Plan.” #4 would be why Obama didn’t participate in
most of the intelligence briefings during his first term in office, but Trump
is getting his clock cleaned before being sworn in as the 45th
President of the United States of America on January 20, 2017 #5 is after
Obama’s first term victory the senate confirmed 7 cabinet nominees without a
hitch on the very first day of hearings, and that’s because Obama won the election and deserved to deliver on his
message with his team………. Did anyone on
the Progressive left hear that?
If you believe in the checks and balances as put forth in
our constitution, then you should take comfort in knowing that the Progressive Left
gave the ‘New’ America First Party the most valuable ability that will enable
the Republican controlled House and Senate to move forward with their electoral
College landslide mandate, and that’s the ‘Nuclear Option!’ I say to the
Progressive left, thank you Harry Reid and your minions, because we all know what goes around comes around! So, expect
smooth sailing through the confirmation hearings, and the repeal of Obamacare
to start, with more to come!
Ha, Ha! Paybacks are hell!
For all their hemming and hawing about filibustering
President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet picks, Democrats, in reality, haven't
got a leg to stand on -- and that's another thanks to Sen. Harry Reid.
The Washington Times reports that the minority leader's
so-called "nuclear option," which he initiated three years ago,
eliminated the role of filibusters to block presidential appointees. Reid
intended it as a way to ram through all of President Obama's nominees without succumbing to Republican opposition.
intended it as a way to ram through all of President Obama's nominees without succumbing to Republican opposition.
Now, that same nuclear option will help Republicans usher in
Trump's cabinet choices with little interference from Democrats. The Times
reports:
The Constitution gives the president the power to nominate
top officials and the Senate the role of providing “advice and consent.” That
has been understood to mean senators must vote to approve each nominee — and,
in recent decades, it has meant a nominee must be able to survive a filibuster.
Both parties trade blame for who’s responsible for things.
Democrats, however, intensified the partisan battles under President George W.
Bush, using the filibuster to prevent him from naming a series of conservative
appeals court judges.
The GOP retaliated under Mr. Obama. Mr. Reid, despite having
been part of the Bush-era filibusters, promised to defend the use of the tool
as leader. He didn’t. With the support of his fellow Democrats he used a
shortcut procedure to change Senate rules: Any nominee save for the Supreme
Court can now be confirmed by majority vote.
Under the new rules Mr. Reid managed to push through
controversial Obama picks including Alejandro Mayorkas as deputy secretary at
Homeland Security and former Rep. Melvin Watt becoming director of the Federal
Housing Finance Agency.
Democrats had been confident of keeping control of the White
House with Hillary Clinton and of taking back control of the Senate. Mr. Reid,
who is retiring at the end of this year, even encouraged Democrats to consider
expanding his use of the nuclear option to eliminate the 60-vote threshold for
Supreme Court nominees.
"It’s clear to me that if the Republicans try to
filibuster another circuit court judge, but especially a Supreme Court justice,
I’ve
told ‘em how and I’ve done it, not just talking about it," Reid said
in a past interview. "I did it in changing the rules of the Senate. It’ll
have to be done again."
Interestingly enough, some Democrats say they don't regret
Reid's use of the nuclear option, intimating that they're at peace with the
fact that Republicans will use it as well.
“I supported what was done,” Sen. Ron Wyden said. “I think
it was in the public interest then. I think it is still in the public
interest.”
For once, we agree! ~~By ‘One Political Plaza,’ a Friend of
America!
Just to refresh 'new' follower’s memories on the way the
Democrats used the ‘Nuclear Option’ to pass Obamacare! Did you know that the
‘Paid to Report’ Media didn’t give you the ‘skinny’ about what had to be done
to shove Obamacare down the throats of the unsuspecting ‘Will’ of the American
people?
If you recall, the Democrats in the House weren’t able to
pass their version of a Healthcare law. Because all revenue bills have to
originate in the House of Representatives, the Senate found a bill that met
those qualifications: HR3590, a military housing bill. They took out
essentially all of the wording of it, and turned it into the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act, Obamacare. It gets better. The Senate at that time had
60 Democrats, just enough to pass Obamacare.
After the bill passed
the Senate, the Democrat Senator Ted Kennedy died. In his place, Massachusetts
elected Republican Scott Brown. That meant that, if the House made any changes
to the bill, the Senate wouldn’t have the necessary number of votes to pass the
corrected bill, since they knew no Republicans would vote for Obamacare. So,
they made a deal with the Democrat‐controlled House of Representatives: the
House would pass the Senate bill without any changes, IF the Senate agreed to
pass a separate bill by the House that made changes to the Senate version of
Obamacare. This second bill was called the Reconciliation Act of 2010.
It made a bunch of
detail changes, and added some things. So the House passed PPACA, the Senate
bill, as well as their Reconciliation Act. So now PPACA was ready for the
President to sign, but the Senate still needed to pass the Reconciliation Act
from the House. Confused yet?
Now, remember that
the Senate only had 59 votes to pass the Reconciliation Act since Republican
Scott Brown replaced Democrat Ted Kennedy. In order to pass the Reconciliation
Act, therefore, the Democrats in the Senate DECIDED TO CHANGE THE RULES!
They declared that
they could use the “Reconciliation Rule”—this is a different “reconciliation”
than the House bill now. This rule was only used for budget item approval, so
that budget items
could be passed with only 51 votes in the Senate, not the usual 60. This rule was never intended to be used for legislation of the magnitude of Obamacare.
could be passed with only 51 votes in the Senate, not the usual 60. This rule was never intended to be used for legislation of the magnitude of Obamacare.
Too bad… they used it anyway. So then both of the “Acts”
passed both houses of Congress and were then signed by President Obama.
EVERYTHING DONE BY DEMOCRATS WITHOUT A SINGLE REPUBLICAN
VOTE IN FAVOR OF IT. TO QUOTE DEMOCRAT REP. ALCEE HASTINGS OF THE HOUSE RULES
COMMITTEE DURING THE BILL PROCESS: “WE’RE MAKING UP THE RULES AS WE GO ALONG”
THEY CERTAINLY COULDN’T HAVE MADE THIS LAW WITHOUT IT.
HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THAT?
With the current threat of Facebook's feckless ability to be bipartisan, feel free to befriend me at 'Jonathan E P Moore' to get direct and instant access, or follow 'While You Were Sleeping' at www.whileyouweredozing.blogspot.com Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
Another great article!
ReplyDelete