'INDIANA, IT'S TIME FOR A GUT CHECK, AND MAKING THE 'WILL' OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE COUNT!!

By Jonathan E.P. Moore

CASTING A VOTE FOR CRUZ IS A VOTE AGAINST AMERICA OUR FOUNDING FATHERS, AND THE CONSTITUTION!!

AFTER 7+ YEARS OF PRESIDENT OBAMA’S AGENDA OF DESTROYING AMERICA, AND NOT A ‘NATURAL BORN CITIZEN,’MAKES ME THINK THAT CONGRESS HAS INTENTIONALLY SET A PRECEDENT THAT WILL COST AMERICA ITS EXCEPTIONAL STATUS IN THE FUTURE?

CAN WE AFFORD ANOTHER PRESIDENT LIKE OBAMA WHO IS NOT A 'NATURAL BORN CITIZEN' AND WHOSE ALLEGIANCE AND LOYALTIES, AS HE HAS DEMONSTRATED, ARE NOT IN LINE WITH THE CONSTITUTION?

PLEASE CHECK OUT THE DISDAIN THAT BOTH PARTIES HAVE FOR THE CONSTITUTION AND OUR FOUNDING FATHERS WISDOM!!

http://www.infowars.com/75-times-obama-broke-law-during-presidency/

Cruz came to the U.S. with his parents in 1974, but no evidence has 'Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America' form with the U.S. Government or if Ted Cruz was issued a U.S. passport prior to entering the country.

All Freedom of Information Act requests filed to obtain documents confirming the true official U.S. citizenship status of Ted Cruz have been denied and will remain sealed until he agrees to allow any such records to be released.

Already, U.S. Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) has vowed to challenge Cruz’s eligibility for the presidency. Might other Democrats join in? Is it really likely that Democrats would be as shy and retiring (read: cowardly) as Republicans were vis a vis Obama’s many, many more eligibility issues?

Cruz should immediately release these documents — regardless of the precedent for stonewalling set by Barack Obama.

If we allow Cruz, like Obama, to jump the turnstile of the Constitutional citizenship requirement to be President, will the American people and America be able to recover? 

Americans have much to ponder regarding the example this president has set for his successor — and what powers that successor will abuse!

This morning's news headlines on 'Fox and Friends' was about how Trumps win in Arizona, and all of the 55 delegates he won, are now just another backroom delegate grab for the second ballot at this years convention in Cleveland by Ted Cruz! Like Louisiana, and then all the delegates in the states of Wyoming, and Colorado who didn't have primaries, and never cast a  single vote, were hustled away by Ted Cruz!!

ATTN: INDIANA!!! AS AMERICANS WE CAN'T ALLOW THE POLITICAL PARTY BOSS'S RULES TO BE ALLOWED TO KEEP TRUMP OUT OF THE GENERAL ELECTION! THEY HAVE LEFT OUT THE OVER 50% OF INDEPENDENTS, AND CROSS OVER DEMOCRATS WHO ARE NOT PERMITTED TO ATTEND OR VOTE IN ANY OF THE INDIVIDUAL PARTY PRIMARIES!!!!


The political party bosses on both sides of the aisle are now calling for a full court press in Indiana, the 'Hoosier' basketball state, and pulling out all the stops to stop Trump, and to stifle the 'Will' of the American's People!'

After the last election Gallup had a poll, I know I'm reporting on this again but it's important to know!, and only 25% of the whole voter base identified themselves as being Republican, and only 32% identified  themselves with being Democrat! So you have to know that with todays  Congressional approval rating of 12.8%, that those number are exaggerated and probably should be a lot lower! The American People numbers who identify with being Independent is probably more than 50%, and not even allowed to vote in the meaningless fixed Republican, and even the Democratic Primaries!!

What that means is that we have 2 political parties that have teamed up to be 'one in the same' for the sole purpose of resetting America's ideology and exceptional status in the world to Globalism/Socialism! The Bipartisan establishment decides on their own, and without the feedback from the American people, who the 2 options for President are! Over 50% of the voter base gets no say in the selection process and are left out of the decision process! The gesture of holding primaries is a weak attempt to show American voters that they have some say, when in reality they don't! A system of corruption, and insider party rules have allowed the political party in power to maintain control over the purse strings, and the 'Will' of the American People! 

This Bipartisan establishments attempt to take over America has been proven and confirmed by its unconstitutional actions, and it's disdain for our founding fathers vision, and the Constitution! We have a Supreme Court who allowed more than 40 executive orders, and Presidential Memorandums to change Obamacare, a supposed passed law! If you don't know what I am about to say, then check it out on your own..PLEASE! The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the applications of the Constitution to the laws of the land, or in other words, call balls and strikes!

The Supreme Court does not make law, but in the Obama years they have decided to apply 'intent of the action' instead of the letter of the law, which is the same as making Law!!!

Trumps new 'America First Party' of Independents and Crossover Trump Democrats is the future of America, and when you hear Carly Fiorina say that Cruz is the future of the Republican Party, and the future of America, you have to know that even though she might be right, it's  a future of continuing to bypass the Constitution by allowing a candidate, that is not citizenship eligible, to run for President!!


THE POLITICAL SYSTEM ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE, ALONG WITH THE 'PAID TO REPORT' MEDIA, HAS POO-POOED THIS 'NATURAL BORN CITIZEN' CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT AND GIVES IT NO CREDIBILITY, BUT BECAUSE OF IT NOT BEING ENFORCED WE HAVE WITNESSED OBAMA'S ACTIONS, AND RELIZE NOW HOW AND WHY IT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVER!!

Can we afford to take another chance on this very important Constitutional requirement to hold the highest office in the land, and after living through 7+ years of Obama’s hell, I think, no matter what race, color, or creed you are, that America is not in a very good place, and I think this ‘Conservative Read,’ by Chris, makes some good and accurate observations!

When it comes to Obama, and hopefully not Cruz, there isn’t much that the president can do to change people’s opinion of him, for better or worse his legacy, barring some extraordinary occurrence! 

Setting aside legislation and executive action (on which more imminently), we note that one of President Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse.

Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up federalism or the separation of powers but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document. With his pen and his phone, and hearkening to Woodrow Wilson’s progressive view of government, he’s been taking out his frustrations with the checks and balances that inhibit his ability to “fundamentally transform” the country.

But a lack of congressional acquiescence hasn’t stopped this president. Even in his first term, the administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, with senior aide Dan Pfeiffer explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And when the reelected President Obama announced his second-term economic plans, he explained that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

1. Obamacare’s Bay State bailout and Commonwealth kickback. To bail out Massachusetts’s malfunctioning health-care exchange, President Obama and Governor Deval Patrick (before he left office) arranged for more than 300,000 state residents to receive temporary Medicaid coverage without any verification of eligibility, and for the state to get the most generous taxpayer-funded premium subsidies in the entire country. 2. Further delays of Obamacare’s employer mandate. On February 10, 2014, the administration announced that it would again be delaying the employer mandate. This particular delay gives mid-sized employers (those with 50 to 100 full-time employees, a category that doesn’t exist in the text of the law) until 2016 to provide coverage and relaxed some of the requirements for larger employers. 3. Extending Obamacare subsidies to non-exchange plans. The administration found in February 2014 that some exchanges were having difficulty determining people’s eligibility. And so now, owing to this “exceptional circumstance,” exchanges can grant retroactive coverage based on the application date rather than on the date of acceptance. Also, those enrolled in plans outside the exchanges who were then determined to be eligible for coverage could receive the subsidies granted to those in an exchange plan. 4. Delay of Obamacare’s transparency requirements. In October 2014, the administration announced that it would not be enforcing the Obamacare’s “transparency in coverage” provisions, which require insurers to disclose data on enrollment, denied claims, and the costs to consumers for certain services.

2. Further delays of Obamacare’s employer mandate. On February 10, 2014, the administration announced that it would again be delaying the employer mandate. This particular delay gives mid-sized employers (those with 50 to 100 full-time employees, a category that doesn’t exist in the text of the law) until 2016 to provide coverage and relaxed some of the requirements for larger employers

.

3. Extending Obamacare subsidies to non-exchange plans. The administration found in February 2014 that some exchanges were having difficulty determining people’s eligibility. And so now, owing to this “exceptional circumstance,” exchanges can grant retroactive coverage based on the application date ,rather than on the date of acceptance. Also, those enrolled in plans outside the exchanges who were then determined to be eligible for coverage could receive the subsidies granted to those in an exchange plan.

4. Delay of Obamacare’s transparency requirements. In October 2014, the administration announced that it would not be enforcing the Obamacare’s “transparency in coverage” provisions, which require insurers to disclose data on enrollment, denied claims, and the costs to consumers for certain services.

5. Obamacare’s hidden tax on states. The Affordable Care Act imposed a health-insurance providers’ fee on insurance companies, for the purpose of taxing the windfall they were expected to receive from increased enrollment. In March 2015, states were notified that they too would be assessed this fee, because they use managed-care organizations to provide Medicaid services. Nothing in the ACA allows the federal government to force states to pay the fee, so the administration left it to the “private” Actuarial Standards Board to determine what makes a state’s payments to managed-care organizations “actuarially sound,” as required by law. The board then interpreted that “actuarially sound” standard to require states to pay the taxes assessed on their managed-care organizations. For Texas, that means an unanticipated annual budget hit of $120 million. This assessment raises serious coercion issues, as the states have no choice but to pay the tax or lose their federal Medicaid funds. Texas, joined by Kansas and Louisiana, sued the government in October.

6. Deferred Action for Parents of Americans. Speaking of Texas suing the government; After President Obama decided in November 2014 that he had been wrong 22 times in saying he couldn’t give temporary legal status to illegal immigrants, a majority of the states took him to court. The administration engineered DAPA in the wake of Congress’s rejection of the very policies the program sets forth, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, immigration law, and the Constitution’s take-care clause. A district court temporarily enjoined DAPA in February 2015, which action the Fifth Circuit twice affirmed. Stay tuned for the Supreme Court’s resolution this coming June.

7. EPA’s Clean Power Plan. In June 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed a new rule for regulating power-plant emissions. Despite significant criticism, on August 3, 2015, it announced a final rule. It gives states until 2018 — it “encourages” September 2016 — to develop final plans to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, with mandatory compliance beginning in 2022. EPA cites Section 111 of the Clean Air Act as justification for the Clean Power Plan, but that section can’t give the agency such authority. Section 111(d) doesn’t permit the government to require states to regulate pollutants from existing sources when those pollutants are already being regulated under Section 112, as those deriving from coal-fired plants are.

8. EPA’s Clean Water Rule. On May 27, 2015, EPA announced its new Clean Water Rule, which aims to protect streams and wetlands from pollution. The agency insists that the rule doesn’t affect bodies of water not previously regulated, but several groups have sued on the basis that the rule’s definitions of regulated waters greatly exceed the EPA’s authority under the Clean Water Act to regulate “waters of the United States.” The Supreme Court has thrice addressed the meaning of that phrase, making clear that, for the EPA to have regulatory authority; a sufficient nexus must exist between the location regulated and “navigable waters.” The Clean Water Rule, however, purports to give EPA power far beyond waters that are “navigable” by any stretch of the definition of that word.

9. EPA’s cap-and-trade. On October 23, 2015, EPA issued a carbon-emissions cap-and-trade regulation, establishing for each state limits on carbon dioxide emission, with four interim steps on the way to the final goal. The focus is on cap-and-trade as the means to meet the limits. EPA says that this rule, too, is authorized by Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, but Congress considered and rejected such a cap-and-trade program in 2009. Far from being authorized by the Clean Air Act or from lying in some zone of statutory ambiguity, this new regulation contradicts the express will of Congress.

10. Net neutrality. In the works throughout the Obama presidency, the Open Internet Rule was adopted in February and went into effect on June 12, 2015. Although the Federal Communications Commission touts the regulation as a means to ensure that the Internet remains free of censorship, the rule impinges on the First Amendment rights of Internet-service providers, which are forbidden to prioritize any Internet traffic. As I said, it was hard to narrow the list to ten examples of lawlessness. Among the other candidates for inclusion are the failure to prosecute the IRS scandal; the infringement, by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, on the exclusive authority of states to regulate the retail energy market (this measure is awaiting the Supreme Court’s ruling); the White House’s exemption of its Office of Administration from the Freedom of Information Act; the expansion of loan guarantees for clean-energy development; and, of course, other changes to Obamacare. A major item that’s technically not a constitutional violation: The National Labor Relations Board has taken several steps, culminating in the Browning-Ferris ruling, to redefine “joint employer” such that franchisers can be held responsible for the labor-law violations of franchisees. That term “joint employer” does not appear in the National Labor Relations Act, and the board’s new rule goes beyond standard agency law to impose liability on companies with “indirect control” over their subsidiaries. This redefinition could destroy the franchise model as well as hasten the automation trend at service outlets.

And note that I’ve kept this discussion entirely to domestic affairs, in part because the scope of executive power over foreign affairs is less clearly defined. Otherwise, one could debate certain military engagements, the Iran nuclear (non-)treaty, and the swap for Bowe Bergdahl — not to mention whatever executive actions come out of the Paris climate talks.

In sum, as the nation limps into Barack Obama’s lame-duck year, Americans have much to ponder regarding the example this president has set for his successor — and what powers that successor will abuse. Hillary Clinton has already pledged to take executive action on gun control, campaign finance, immigration (because apparently President Obama is too timid here), corporate inversions, and who knows what else. And imagine what Donald Trump would do if given the chance!

ATTN: INDIANA!! 'WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING' AMERICA THAT WE ONCE KNEW, IS IN JEOPARDY OF BEING TRANSFORMED INTO A UNCONSTITUTIONAL GLOBALIST DEAD END!!!......AND YOU SAY??

 Jonathan E P Moore ‘While You Were Sleeping’

THE NEXT ‘While You Were Sleeping’

Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.