DEAR PROGRESSIVE LEFT, 3 STRIKES AND YOUR OUT, RIGHT? FIRST
STRIKE WAS LOSING THE ELECTION, SECOND STRIKE WAS LOSING THE RECOUNT, AND THE
THIRD STRIKE WAS HILLARY LOSING MORE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES (5) THEN TRUMP (2)!
I thought it was over after the official Electoral College
results were in, but when I heard Michelle Obama define hope in her own words,
I knew, for a fact that Barack Obama should never have been allowed to be
seated as President of the United States because of the Citizenship
requirement, which he doesn’t meet and is clearly outlined in the
Constitution….
The requirement calls for a ‘Natural Born’ citizen, and not
a ‘naturalized’ citizen which is what Obama is, and now you should all know why
it’s so obvious!
The Founders wanted to assure that the Office of President
and Commander in Chief of the Military, a non-collegial and unique and powerful
civil and military position, was free of all foreign influence and that its
holder has sole and absolute allegiance, loyalty, and attachment to the U.S.
The “natural born Citizen” clause was the best way for them to assure this.
That the “natural born Citizen” clause is based on undivided allegiance and
loyalty can be seen from how the Founders distinguished between "citizen"
and "natural born Citizen."
MICHELLE OBAMA’S WORDS, YOU REMEMBER, THE THINGS THAT MATTER
ACCORDING TO HILLARY!
My point? Who could possible say the things the Obama’s say,
and show as much disdain for the only exceptional country left in the world if
he was a ‘natural born citizen’?
Obama spoke candidly about the past election, saying that
the whole process was a "painful" experience.
"You know, this past election was challenging for me as
a -- as a citizen. To watch and experience. It was painful." The first
lady also acknowledged that she ultimately went to sleep not knowing the
outcome of the election.
Who in their right mind, based on the parameters of the
citizenship requirement, would think that this man and his wife have a clue what hope means
to the American people, and then throw it back in America’s face and tell us
“That’s not who we are!”
Over the centuries, we’ve delivered ‘hope and change’ all
around the world in different ways that are unique only to this country. WWI,
WWII, and defending not only our own interests but supplying the hope and support
for catastrophes due to Earthquakes, Typhoons, Tsunamis, political
suppression and genocide!
America has always given people hope and not just here, but
around the world, and Like Trump Michelle, we are not perfect and nobody is,
but America has given more and taken less than any other country in history,
and on a massive scale! American’s have large hearts and a huge conscience, and because of that, recognize how lucky we truly are to be in this country, and having the
ability to help and give hope to other countries not so fortunate, and will continue to answer
that bell again, and again, and again!
Until I heard Michelle Obama's self promoting delusional comments, and her definition of hope, this was going to be my first line:
The American people have been played for the last 8 years
and my only hope now is that these rats, who jumped off our Constitutional
Republic Train to help with the transformation of America to Socialism, be
brought in to the light and punished for their apparent part in the scheme to
undermine America’s Constitution!
Personally, I’ve had to jump over a few Facebook hurdles, avoid a few
landmines, and dodge more than a few bullets on my way to today, the day after
it became official that Donald J. Trump avoided another plot to sabotage the ‘Will’
of the American people, and legitimizing his victory, and he had to do that by
clearing that final Constitution’s required Electoral College hurdle!
I don’t know why, but last night after Trump’s final hurdle
had been realized, my obstacle course that I’ve had to navigate since the
beginning of the primaries, was gone, and I was set free by Facebook’s ‘powers
to be’ to get back to the business at hand..... Go Figure!
As a registered Independent, and obviously, a leaning
‘right’ registered Independent, has afforded me an objective outside view of
what makes this country stand out over all other countries, and the reason
everybody wants to be a part of this countries exception existence, and that’s
the Constitution, and the rights it grants to all its citizens, legal citizens!
I think what everybody should know, if they don’t know it already, and not the
‘Paid to Report’ Media’s wants you to think, is that Trump just wants to get
back to the basics that existed before Obama and Hillary attempted ideological
transformation of America! Like President elect Trump, I’m anti nothing when it
comes to immigration and who comes in to our country, I just want them to go
through the legal process, like many that I already know did, so that they can
assimilate and experience America’s different cultures, traditions, laws, and
rights as outlined by the Constitution!
As the saying goes, for every step you take forward, you
might have to take 2 steps back, and after the last eight years, 2 steps
back appears
to be the way we must go to reset our Constitutional Republics strength, before moving forward and sleeping off the 'hang over,' but not with the hair of the dog that bit us (Hillary)!
Every year more and more people have decided to be
Independent, but don’t quite understands what being Independent means, I am
tired of the misconception of what people believe being Independent does mean. I
have had this article in my archives for a while now, and thought I would run it up
the flag pole again......
“BEING INDEPENDENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BEING UNDECIDED.”
"Everyone has the ability to think for themselves and
question what other people are saying if they don't think it's right,"
(CNN) -- As he watched the presidential debates, Bretton
Holmes was irritated. But it wasn't the candidates who were getting to him, it
was hearing independent voters and undecided voters lumped into the same group.
The 35-year-old from Phoenix has registered as an
independent since he was 18. He has voted for Democrats and Republicans over
the years.
The biggest misconception he hears is this: "If you're
registered as an independent, that must mean you're undecided," he said.
"That's just an opinion that happens to be very
incorrect," he said. "Being independent has nothing to do with being undecided."
incorrect," he said. "Being independent has nothing to do with being undecided."
Living in a two-party country can be tough for this group of
voters, but there are more independents these days than ever.
Thirty-eight percent of Americans identify themselves as independents,
according to a 2012 study
on party identification by the Pew Research Center
for the People & the Press. (It increased to 42% after the 2012 elections, and probably, after the last 4 years under Obama, increased again!)
"The proportion of independents now equals its highest
level in 70 years," said a different Pew study from 2009. "Owing to
defections from the Republican Party, independents are more conservative on
several key issues than in the past."
Being called an undecided voter irks "independent
thinker" Holmes, as he already has made his decision. "In my case, it
was already clear who I wanted to vote for," he said. He cast an early
ballot for President Barack Obama.
CNN asked independents why they refuse to align with a party
and heard from more than 100 people. A variety of themes arose, from not
wanting to be labeled to disgust with political rancor to feeling that being
independent is the "spirit of America."
‘I DON’T LIKE BEING LABELED!’
Omekongo Dibinga of Washington has consistently voted
Democrat but explains that he's always identified himself as an independent.
He's never voted for a Republican because "I haven't
agreed with any of the candidates' values, but I reserve the right to vote for
a
Republican if their values match mine," he said.
Growing up in an impoverished neighborhood in Boston where
"violence was a problem," Dibinga faced stereotypes that he has
worked to overcome as a diversity consultant and motivational speaker.
"I don't like being labeled. I've been labeled a lot of
things in my life," he said.
Jennifer Cummins, a moderate independent, has a similar
problem with siding with just one party.
"It's mostly the label," she said. "If you
say you're a Democrat, that must mean you are a left-wing liberal with no
personal responsibility. If you say you are a Republican, you must be a
right-wing millionaire who doesn't care about others."
The Frankfort, Kentucky, voter feels a "lack of
respect" toward independents like her and wishes there was more air time
given to independent candidates.
"I think it's a travesty that the only 'limelight' that
exists is with either Republican or Democratic when there are other options on
the ballot with better opinions, much better track records, and a real
solution," she said.
VOTING FOR THE ‘LESSER OF TWO EVILS!’
Roger Cantillo, 37, identified more with the Democratic
Party when he was younger, but he started considering himself an independent in
2008.
"The 2008 presidential race is when I really started
getting involved in politics and trying to
understand what's going on in
Washington. It's just unfortunate that there's a lot of gridlock, and people
are playing both sides," he said. In the last few elections, he voted for
Republican George W. Bush, Democrat John Kerry and, most recently, Obama.
While Cantillo's "progressive values" indicate, he
leans more to the left, Cantillo said he finds faults with both parties. He
will be voting for Obama on Election Day, but he's not enthusiastic about it.
"I'm picking the lesser of two evils come this
election."
IT’S THE ‘SPIRIT OF AMERICA!’
Raised as a Southern Democrat who switched to voting
Republican in 1999, Mary Helen Yarborough has voted for presidential candidates
from both parties equally. She has identified as a "confused"
independent for 10 years, she said.
GOP presidential candidates Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich
excited the right-leaning independent in the primaries, and she
"flirted" with the idea of voting for Obama back in July. Ultimately,
she says, her vote will go to Mitt Romney next week.
But the opinionated South Carolinian doesn't want to be tied
down to a party. "I don't want to be controlled," she said. "I
feel better as an independent. I feel like it's a more honest position."
Voting independent just feels "more American," she
said. "America was born on the theme of independence, and I find that
being a committed independent is therefore truer to our national pride."
Betty Faller-Pearson, 66, voted for Obama in 2008 and Bush
in 2004. She agrees with Yarborough's line of thinking.
"I don't vote party lines because I don't always agree
with either party, Democrats or Republicans," she said. "I'm not
liberal, I'm
not conservative. I'm independent and can make my own
decisions."
For the Las Vegas resident, being an independent goes back
to America's roots. "I am an independent voter because I believe in the
spirit of America and how and why it was founded," she said.
Raised Republican in Texas and now married to a Democrat
from New Jersey, Jim Mitchem's flavor of independence stems from a similar
tree.
"I've never been one for dogma and don't feel like any
'side' could represent my free will well enough to go straight ticket," he
said.
The 44-year-old has voted for Ronald Reagan, Bush, Ross
Perot (twice), Al Gore and Obama. He said it's "too restricting" to
affiliate with one party. "In the spirit of independence by Americans who
broke away from political dogma in the 1700s, I'm proud to be
unaffiliated."
LOST BETWEEN PARTIES!
Brian Pigg confesses he feels "lost" politically.
Growing up in the Reagan era, the 44-year-old holds the
Republican beliefs of smaller government and fiscal responsibility, he said. As
a veteran, he supports having a strong military.
But his concerns with the increasing U.S. debt and George W.
Bush's presidency made him
reconsider the way he voted, he said.
"Years ago, I began to feel disowned by my party, as
this debt didn't start in '08 (not that it isn't getting worse)," he wrote
on CNN iReport. The "rise of the religious right" was the final
straw.
What's a man without a party to do? At first, he thought
about abstaining from voting.
"I haven't heard a single candidate worth voting for,
not in local, state, or federal elections," he said. "They all seem
to say whatever they think will get them votes without actually being nailed to
anything."
The Grandview, Missouri, resident admits he wasn't going to
vote at all this year until controversy arose around U.S. Senate candidate Todd
Akin's comments on rape. "Now I'm going just to vote against him. How sad
is that," he asked.
BE ‘FREE THINKERS!’
But Holmes, the voter who emphasized the difference between
independents and undecided, asserts that voting as "free thinkers" is
the answer.
"Everyone can think for themselves and question what
other people are saying if they don't think it's right," he said.
"Speak up!" ~~“Neither Republican or Democrat: Why I'm an independent” By Christina Zdanowicz, a Friend of America!
With the current threat of Facebook's feckless ability to be bipartisan feel free to befriend me at 'Jonathan E P Moore' to get direct and instant access, or follow 'While You Were Sleeping' at www.whileyouweredozing.blogspot.com Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment