IT'S TIME TO LISTEN TO THE TRUTH AND NOT BLAMING OUR FUTURE FOR OUR PAST FAILURES AND LIES!!
THE OBAMA/ HILLARY PATENTED BLAME GAME IS NOW TAKING YOUR ATTENTION AWAY FROM HILLARY’S CONTINUED LYING AND DECEPTION, AND MOST OF ALL, HER FAILURE TO REPRESENT THE ‘WILL’ OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!
BEHIND THE SCENES, NBC EXECS CONCEDE MATT LAUER FORUM PERFORMANCE WAS ‘DISASTER!’
by CNN, the (C)linton (N)ews (N)etwork!
I guess those 270+ days of avoiding the tough questions by the 'Paid to Report' Media has finally caught up with 'Hiding' Hillary! ....I guess interrupting Hillary 7 times, and Trump 13 times during the Lauer interview is letting Trump off the hook!!....I guess you really can't get around the truth when it is told!!
Lauer was widely criticized for failing to fact-check or follow up when Trump falsely claimed that he was opposed to the Iraq war when it started. Some viewers thought Lauer held Clinton to a higher standard than Trump. The Clinton campaign agreed -- it blasted off a fund-raising email on Thursday afternoon titled "Matt Lauer."
The blame does not fall on Lauer alone. NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack, a longtime friend of Lauer's, was intimately involved in the forum planning and execution. "This should be a black eye for Lack," one of the sources said.
I guess the ‘Paid to Report’ Media can’t fact check Trump’s truth when they spend all their time defending Hillary’s lies and deception! ...Hmmm, go figure!!
71% DOCTORS SAY HILLARY HEALTH CONCERNS SERIOUS!
‘IRAN MAY HAVE RECEIVED AS MUCH AS $33.6 BILLION IN CASH, GOLD PAYMENTS FROM U.S.
New questions emerge on several billions paid out to Iran by Obama admin.
Iran may have received an additional $33.6 billion in secret cash and gold payments facilitated by the Obama administration between 2014 and 2016, according to testimony provided before Congress by an expert on last summer’s nuclear agreement with Iran.
Between January 2014 and July 2015, when the Obama administration was hammering out the final details of the nuclear accord, Iran was paid $700 million every month from funds that had previously been frozen by U.S. sanctions.
A total of $11.9 billion was ultimately paid to Iran, but the details surrounding these payments remain shrouded in mystery, according to Mark Dubowitz, executive director at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
In total, “Iran may have received as much as $33.6 billion in cash or in gold and other precious metals,” Dubowitz disclosed.
New questions about these payments are emerging following confirmation from top Obama administration officials on Thursday that it was forced to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash prior to the release of several U.S. hostages earlier this year. The administration insisted that cash had to be used for this payment.
Top administration officials were adamant that the cash payments were the best way to ensure that Iran got immediate access to this money due to its ongoing difficulty accessing international funds still sanctioned by the West.
Lawmakers and others are now pressing the administration to disclose how a slew of other payments to Iran were made in the years leading up to the final nuclear accord.
“In July, the Associated Press cited U.S. officials who estimated that Iran ‘brought home less than $20 billion.’ Were these funds repatriated to Tehran in cash or in gold and precious metals? Through the formal financial system? Or through some combination?” Dubowitz asked in his testimony before the House Financial Services Committee.
“The administration should also clarify if the $20 billion dollars is inclusive of the $11.9 billion in [Joint Plan of Action] funds, or if the $20 billion was in addition to the $11.9 billion,” he said. “Either way, it is important to understand how funds were sent. The worst-case scenario here is that Iran may have received as much as $33.6 billion in cash or in gold and other precious metals.”
At least some of this money was likely sent in cash and other assets, according to Dubowitz.
The Obama administration was forced to disclose on Thursday that current sanctions and banking restrictions prohibited it from transferring funds to Iran via electronic methods.
The cash payment of $1.7 billion earlier this year was the easiest way to ensure Iran got immediate access to the money, according to these officials.
“Iran had to have it in cash,” Paul Ahern, assistant general counsel for enforcement and intelligence at the Treasury Department, told lawmakers. “Iran was very aware of the difficulties it would face in accessing and using the funds if they were in any other form than cash, even after the lifting of sanctions.”
A cash delivery “was the most reliable way that they received the funds in a timely manner and it was the manner preferred by the relative foreign banks,” Ahren said.
Given the situation, it is likely that the multiple past payments to Iran were conducted in a similar fashion, according to Dubowitz.
“If the White House could only send cash to Iran from the start of the JPOA period through the Tribunal payment that could amount to a grant total of 33.6 billion,” he said. “Did any of this money go through the formal financial system? If so, the administration is not being truthful about the 1.7 billion. If many billions arrived in Iran on pallets [of cash] this would be a pretty astounding revelation.”
Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official and expert on rogue regimes, said that cash payments of this nature are “highly irregular.”
“There’s no reason it needed to be paid now. After all, successive administrations, both Democratic and Republican, have delayed payments so as to avoid funding Iranian terrorism,” Rubin said. “Likewise, if the United States freezes accounts linked to al Qaeda or Hamas, releasing it and saying, ‘It’s their money anyway,’ would not be a tenable explanation. Cash payments are highly irregular.”
The Iranians have been clear that they “perceived the payment to be a ransom” despite the administration’s protestations, Rubin explained.
“Not only has the delivery of the millions of dollars been perceived as a ransom, provided as an incentive to seize more hostages …. but because the money was delivered in cash the payment bolstered the strength of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and augmented its ability to finance and conduct terrorism,” he said.
THE DAY AFTER HANGOVER FOR HILLARY: ‘HILLARY SHOWED THAT SHE IS UNQUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,’ AGAIN, AND CONTINUES ON WITH HER ‘LIES TOUR’ IN NORTH CAROLINA!
First of all, Hillary will never put troops on the ground in the Middle East, but I guess she didn’t know that Obama already has 5,000 Military troops there! Is she going to bring them home, which was Obama’s original plan until he figured out that he couldn’t…Hmmm!
Next topic was playing the race card and pandering, like Obama, to reinforce the lie about voter ID laws being a racist plot by the Republicans to stop blacks and minorities from voting. She wants to make it easier to vote and incorporate an automatic registration upon your 18th birthday! Hillary in NC: Voter ID Law Is 'Blast from Jim Crow Past' At a speech in Charlotte, North Carolina on Thursday, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton said the state's voter ID laws are "a blast from the Jim Crow past." The law, which requires voters to provide a form of identification at the polls, has been skewered by liberals across the country as discriminatory toward minorities.
Should Clinton become president, she said she would reverse this course by enacting universal voter registration that would automatically register people to vote when they turn 18. This would be just one part of her effort to "repair the damage" done to the Voting Rights Act, she said.
Clinton also used her podium to slam North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R) for his other "bigoted policies" such as HB2, which prevents those who identify as transgender from using whichever public restroom they want.. Hmmm!!
In addition to voting for her in November, Clinton urged her audience to "change their governor." Next we had the promise of paying for college and eliminating the debt that a college education costs, but did she say anything about who or how, or even where the money would be coming from…’NO!!!’
She professes that she wants to create jobs by training for the demand of computer techs by 2020, but did she mention anything about the open borders and the cheaper labor from other border countries making their way here to work and exist at the cost of American jobs, and the American People? ’NO!!!’
If you were at this Hillary Clinton speech you should have come away with the fact that Hillary is lying! Hillary is again using the millennials who have never experienced a positive thriving economy, and because of that, depending on the government’s welfare and subsidies that GOVERNMENT provides! Obama and Hillary are introducing their vision of Socialism for Americas future by forcing you to depend on Government, and not by your own ability to take care of yourself and thrive in America's free market place based on your talent, ambition, and work ethic!
Hillary used the phrase “Sort out fact over opinion,’ but can’t come clean on her emails and Obama’s crooked FBI and DOJ that has let her skate on her illegal actions!
Hillary then used the phrase “Country over Party” when it
came to the ‘Never Trump’ Republicans, but if it’s “Country over Party” then
why are Hillary and Obama following Alinsky’s Socialist blue print to undermine our
founding fathers vision for America, and the constitution?
Did you miss this a couple of days ago??
OBAMA WH ADMITS THAT HILLARY GAVE ISIS $400 MILLION BY ACCIDENT!!...Hmmm! August 6, 2016 President Obama quickly papered over the fact that he gave Iran $400,000,000 to release hostages, but it appears that now Hillary Clinton may have given ISIS $400,000,000 accidently.
So everyone can agree that the $400 million sent to Iran by President Obama can be viewed as skeptical. Yes, we received hostages back, but at the same time Iran got all this money and who knows what they are going to do with it?
HILLARY LOSES OR MISPLACED $6 BILLION WHILE SECRETARY OF STATE…Hmmm! http://whileyouweredozing.blogspot.com/2016/06/while-clinton-hid-emails-6-billion.html#.V9KLqq-V-74
HILLARY LIES AGAIN TO NORTH CAROLINA STUDENTS! WHEN IS ENOUGH GOING TO BE ENOUGH!!Trump’s comments about the Generals are more than accurate, and if you remember Obama fired some 197 high ranking military officials because he couldn’t trust them to fire upon, or order his men to fire upon radical citizens of America who were vocalizing their discontent with his administrations unconstitutional executive orders and presidential memorandums to bypass our congress and the Constitution!!
Obama Fired 197 US Senior Military Commanders in 5 years? (nine Generals in 2013)
BELOW ARE THREE NEWS ITEMS (You will never see in the main stream media)
1.OBAMA TRANSFORMS US MILITARY
2.INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY OCTOBER 29, 2013 (OBAMA FIRES 197 SENIOR MILITARY COMMANDERS IN FIVE YEARS (37 Four Star Generals)!
3.OBAMA FIRES 9 COMMANDING GENERALS IN 2013!
What the president calls “my military” is being cleansed of any officer suspected of disloyalty to or disagreement with the administration on matters of policy or force structure, leaving the compliant and fearful.
SO WHAT TRUMP IS SAYING IS THAT OBAMA STRIPPED THE BEST GENERALS OUT OF THE SYSTEM AND REPLACED THEM WITH SECOND STRINGERS THAT BOWED TO OBAMA AND HIS ANTI-AMERICAN MILITARY AGENDA!
We recognize President Obama is the commander-in-chief and that throughout history presidents from Lincoln to Truman have seen fit to remove military commanders they view as inadequate or insubordinate. Turnover in the military ranks is normal, and in these times of sequestration and budget cuts the numbers are expected to tick up as force levels shrink and missions change.
Yet what has happened to our officer corps since President Obama took office is viewed in many quarters as unprecedented, baffling and even harmful to our national security posture. We have commented on some of the higher profile cases, such as Gen. Carter Ham. He was relieved as head of U.S. Africa Command after only a year and a half because he disagreed with orders not to mount a rescue mission in response to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack in Benghazi.
OBAMA PROMISED TO DISMANTLE OUR ARMED FORCES BACK IN 2010!
Obama Promised to Dismantle Our Armed Forces back in 2010, and for his whole reign of terror has destroyed our position in the world, and our ally’s!
Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barrack Obama outlining his plans for America’s national defense. Obama’s presentation demonstrates either total naiveté about important national security programs or he is just pandering for votes among the extreme left.
I’m the only major candidate to oppose this war from the beginning and as president I will end it.” No one likes war: especially those who have to do the fighting and dying. Yet, our military leaders make clear that the consequences of a rapid withdrawal from Iraq as Obama seeks would be disastrous not only for American interests in the region but for Iraq itself. It would provide a propaganda victory for al Qaeda and Iran because they will be able to claim they defeated America. Further, it could worsen the Iraqi civil war, create an unstable Mideast and further spike oil prices.
“Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.” Anyone who has worked with the military for any length of time knows there is waste, often in weapons systems. Recently, the Government Accountability Office found that 95 major weapons systems — including the Joint Strike Fighter and the Littoral Combat Ship — have exceeded their original budgets. These cost overruns could be the result of waste or mismanagement or, perhaps, the development and fielding of sophisticated new weapons with constantly changing requirements is difficult and inefficient.
“I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.
"I will not weaponize space.” America’s current policy is not to weaponize space.
“I will slow our development of future combat systems.”
“… and I will institute an independent defense priorities board to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.”
“To seek that goal I will not develop new nuclear weapons.” That’s dangerous.
I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material…” Nations capable of producing nuclear weapons produce fissile material for their atomic arsenals.
“… and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair trigger alert…”
“… and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.”
Senator Obama’s national security views expressed in his 52-second video reflect that of a knee-jerk liberal academic who thinks that the US is the primary threat to world peace. His views are dangerously naive and his statements suggest a shallow understanding of national security issues and in some cases his facts are wrong.
Obama called ISIS the JV Team, told us they were on the run, and continually, with the help of John Kerry, lying to the American people for the sake of his own legacy!
DOES ANYBODY OUT THERE REALLY BELIEVE THAT HILLARY ISN’T GOING TO CONTINUE ON WITH OBAMA’S ANTI-AMERICAN MILITARY PRESENSE IN THE WORLD AND TEAR DOWN OUR NATIONS DEFENSES?
EVEN GEORGE BUSH’S MESSAGE WARNED OBAMA WHAT WOULD HAPPEN, BUT OBAMA KNOWS BEST, RIGHT? …PLEASE KNOW THAT I’M NOT A BIG FAN OF THE MESSENGER, BUT IT IS WHAT IT IS…!
https://youtu.be/84ukJlcpqEY
It is hard to imagine a policy more irresponsible, or worse from a moral standpoint. Yet it has been the long-standing policy of Obama and Kerry — and it was Secretary of State Clinton’s, too, until her last weeks in office, when she finally seemed to be getting serious, only to have her new plans thrown out by Kerry. Fanning a rebellion just up to the point where the country is bleeding continuously — what could be more horrible? As the saying goes, “It is worse than a crime, it is a mistake.” Worse, because it keeps compounding the crime, as a matter of principle. But absurd behaviors often have their causes in beliefs. This policy has been a logical product of the attitudes and ideologies of the Obama administration: anti-anti-Islamism, moral posturing, moral inversion — enthusiasm about toppling allies like Mubarak, nervousness about toppling adversaries like Assad — and, under the guise of peace, an ideological neutralism directed against one’s own side, something very different from an honestly neutral objectivity.
There are several other self-defeating U.S. policies that have nurtured the rise of the Islamic State, directly and indirectly. They go beyond Syria; indeed, they span the entire Mideast:
1. The “little and late” character of the current air strikes in Iraq.
The U.S. for months ignored Iraq’s requests for help. It just let the Islamic State keep growing. The belated help has been minimalist, and it is given a false, self-limiting rationale. Militarily, the refusal to put boots on the ground means that we lack the guidance needed for fully effective air strikes. Politically, Obama has relied on Iraq’s democratic parliamentary process to make essential changes, and the most it has been capable of delivering is another leader from within Maliki’s Shi’a party, hardly a good beginning for winning back Sunni trust. What was plainly needed was a figure from Ayad Allawi’s mixed Shia-Sunni party instead.
2. The prior complete withdrawal from Iraq.
This compounded the mistake of the Bush administration in destabilizing Iraq, while undoing Bush’s self-corrective measure, the surge. Obama argues that he had to withdraw, after failing to get a new status-of-forces agreement, but that failure was far from a mere objective fact. Obama did not keep pushing by the usual methods that have gotten America status-of-forces agreements and allowed us to keep adequate long-term residual forces on the ground elsewhere. He was too interested in satisfying his domestic base with a total withdrawal.
You can’t really just blame Bush and Obama alone, but this year’s Obama’s continuation candidate, Hillary Clinton, who like always seems to be somewhere hiding in the background of every contentious encounter with the evil in the world. The cause of ISIS was not only her feckless ability to negotiate the troop withdrawal as Secretary of State in Iraq, which would have been her job, but also bungled the gun running to the rebels against Syria’s Assad which ended up arming and funding the upstart ISIS…Oh, don’t forget the missing $6 Billion that went missing or lost at the same time!~~The National Review
THE OBAMA/ HILLARY PATENTED BLAME GAME IS NOW TAKING YOUR ATTENTION AWAY FROM HILLARY’S CONTINUED LYING AND DECEPTION, AND MOST OF ALL, HER FAILURE TO REPRESENT THE ‘WILL’ OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!
BEHIND THE SCENES, NBC EXECS CONCEDE MATT LAUER FORUM PERFORMANCE WAS ‘DISASTER!’
by CNN, the (C)linton (N)ews (N)etwork!
I guess those 270+ days of avoiding the tough questions by the 'Paid to Report' Media has finally caught up with 'Hiding' Hillary! ....I guess interrupting Hillary 7 times, and Trump 13 times during the Lauer interview is letting Trump off the hook!!....I guess you really can't get around the truth when it is told!!
Lauer was widely criticized for failing to fact-check or follow up when Trump falsely claimed that he was opposed to the Iraq war when it started. Some viewers thought Lauer held Clinton to a higher standard than Trump. The Clinton campaign agreed -- it blasted off a fund-raising email on Thursday afternoon titled "Matt Lauer."
The blame does not fall on Lauer alone. NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack, a longtime friend of Lauer's, was intimately involved in the forum planning and execution. "This should be a black eye for Lack," one of the sources said.
I guess the ‘Paid to Report’ Media can’t fact check Trump’s truth when they spend all their time defending Hillary’s lies and deception! ...Hmmm, go figure!!
71% DOCTORS SAY HILLARY HEALTH CONCERNS SERIOUS!
‘IRAN MAY HAVE RECEIVED AS MUCH AS $33.6 BILLION IN CASH, GOLD PAYMENTS FROM U.S.
New questions emerge on several billions paid out to Iran by Obama admin.
Iran may have received an additional $33.6 billion in secret cash and gold payments facilitated by the Obama administration between 2014 and 2016, according to testimony provided before Congress by an expert on last summer’s nuclear agreement with Iran.
Between January 2014 and July 2015, when the Obama administration was hammering out the final details of the nuclear accord, Iran was paid $700 million every month from funds that had previously been frozen by U.S. sanctions.
A total of $11.9 billion was ultimately paid to Iran, but the details surrounding these payments remain shrouded in mystery, according to Mark Dubowitz, executive director at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
In total, “Iran may have received as much as $33.6 billion in cash or in gold and other precious metals,” Dubowitz disclosed.
New questions about these payments are emerging following confirmation from top Obama administration officials on Thursday that it was forced to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash prior to the release of several U.S. hostages earlier this year. The administration insisted that cash had to be used for this payment.
Top administration officials were adamant that the cash payments were the best way to ensure that Iran got immediate access to this money due to its ongoing difficulty accessing international funds still sanctioned by the West.
Lawmakers and others are now pressing the administration to disclose how a slew of other payments to Iran were made in the years leading up to the final nuclear accord.
“In July, the Associated Press cited U.S. officials who estimated that Iran ‘brought home less than $20 billion.’ Were these funds repatriated to Tehran in cash or in gold and precious metals? Through the formal financial system? Or through some combination?” Dubowitz asked in his testimony before the House Financial Services Committee.
“The administration should also clarify if the $20 billion dollars is inclusive of the $11.9 billion in [Joint Plan of Action] funds, or if the $20 billion was in addition to the $11.9 billion,” he said. “Either way, it is important to understand how funds were sent. The worst-case scenario here is that Iran may have received as much as $33.6 billion in cash or in gold and other precious metals.”
At least some of this money was likely sent in cash and other assets, according to Dubowitz.
The Obama administration was forced to disclose on Thursday that current sanctions and banking restrictions prohibited it from transferring funds to Iran via electronic methods.
The cash payment of $1.7 billion earlier this year was the easiest way to ensure Iran got immediate access to the money, according to these officials.
“Iran had to have it in cash,” Paul Ahern, assistant general counsel for enforcement and intelligence at the Treasury Department, told lawmakers. “Iran was very aware of the difficulties it would face in accessing and using the funds if they were in any other form than cash, even after the lifting of sanctions.”
A cash delivery “was the most reliable way that they received the funds in a timely manner and it was the manner preferred by the relative foreign banks,” Ahren said.
Given the situation, it is likely that the multiple past payments to Iran were conducted in a similar fashion, according to Dubowitz.
“If the White House could only send cash to Iran from the start of the JPOA period through the Tribunal payment that could amount to a grant total of 33.6 billion,” he said. “Did any of this money go through the formal financial system? If so, the administration is not being truthful about the 1.7 billion. If many billions arrived in Iran on pallets [of cash] this would be a pretty astounding revelation.”
Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official and expert on rogue regimes, said that cash payments of this nature are “highly irregular.”
“There’s no reason it needed to be paid now. After all, successive administrations, both Democratic and Republican, have delayed payments so as to avoid funding Iranian terrorism,” Rubin said. “Likewise, if the United States freezes accounts linked to al Qaeda or Hamas, releasing it and saying, ‘It’s their money anyway,’ would not be a tenable explanation. Cash payments are highly irregular.”
The Iranians have been clear that they “perceived the payment to be a ransom” despite the administration’s protestations, Rubin explained.
“Not only has the delivery of the millions of dollars been perceived as a ransom, provided as an incentive to seize more hostages …. but because the money was delivered in cash the payment bolstered the strength of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and augmented its ability to finance and conduct terrorism,” he said.
THE DAY AFTER HANGOVER FOR HILLARY: ‘HILLARY SHOWED THAT SHE IS UNQUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,’ AGAIN, AND CONTINUES ON WITH HER ‘LIES TOUR’ IN NORTH CAROLINA!
First of all, Hillary will never put troops on the ground in the Middle East, but I guess she didn’t know that Obama already has 5,000 Military troops there! Is she going to bring them home, which was Obama’s original plan until he figured out that he couldn’t…Hmmm!
Next topic was playing the race card and pandering, like Obama, to reinforce the lie about voter ID laws being a racist plot by the Republicans to stop blacks and minorities from voting. She wants to make it easier to vote and incorporate an automatic registration upon your 18th birthday! Hillary in NC: Voter ID Law Is 'Blast from Jim Crow Past' At a speech in Charlotte, North Carolina on Thursday, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton said the state's voter ID laws are "a blast from the Jim Crow past." The law, which requires voters to provide a form of identification at the polls, has been skewered by liberals across the country as discriminatory toward minorities.
Should Clinton become president, she said she would reverse this course by enacting universal voter registration that would automatically register people to vote when they turn 18. This would be just one part of her effort to "repair the damage" done to the Voting Rights Act, she said.
Clinton also used her podium to slam North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R) for his other "bigoted policies" such as HB2, which prevents those who identify as transgender from using whichever public restroom they want.. Hmmm!!
In addition to voting for her in November, Clinton urged her audience to "change their governor." Next we had the promise of paying for college and eliminating the debt that a college education costs, but did she say anything about who or how, or even where the money would be coming from…’NO!!!’
She professes that she wants to create jobs by training for the demand of computer techs by 2020, but did she mention anything about the open borders and the cheaper labor from other border countries making their way here to work and exist at the cost of American jobs, and the American People? ’NO!!!’
If you were at this Hillary Clinton speech you should have come away with the fact that Hillary is lying! Hillary is again using the millennials who have never experienced a positive thriving economy, and because of that, depending on the government’s welfare and subsidies that GOVERNMENT provides! Obama and Hillary are introducing their vision of Socialism for Americas future by forcing you to depend on Government, and not by your own ability to take care of yourself and thrive in America's free market place based on your talent, ambition, and work ethic!
Hillary used the phrase “Sort out fact over opinion,’ but can’t come clean on her emails and Obama’s crooked FBI and DOJ that has let her skate on her illegal actions!
Did you miss this a couple of days ago??
OBAMA WH ADMITS THAT HILLARY GAVE ISIS $400 MILLION BY ACCIDENT!!...Hmmm! August 6, 2016 President Obama quickly papered over the fact that he gave Iran $400,000,000 to release hostages, but it appears that now Hillary Clinton may have given ISIS $400,000,000 accidently.
So everyone can agree that the $400 million sent to Iran by President Obama can be viewed as skeptical. Yes, we received hostages back, but at the same time Iran got all this money and who knows what they are going to do with it?
HILLARY LOSES OR MISPLACED $6 BILLION WHILE SECRETARY OF STATE…Hmmm! http://whileyouweredozing.blogspot.com/2016/06/while-clinton-hid-emails-6-billion.html#.V9KLqq-V-74
HILLARY LIES AGAIN TO NORTH CAROLINA STUDENTS! WHEN IS ENOUGH GOING TO BE ENOUGH!!Trump’s comments about the Generals are more than accurate, and if you remember Obama fired some 197 high ranking military officials because he couldn’t trust them to fire upon, or order his men to fire upon radical citizens of America who were vocalizing their discontent with his administrations unconstitutional executive orders and presidential memorandums to bypass our congress and the Constitution!!
Obama Fired 197 US Senior Military Commanders in 5 years? (nine Generals in 2013)
BELOW ARE THREE NEWS ITEMS (You will never see in the main stream media)
1.OBAMA TRANSFORMS US MILITARY
2.INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY OCTOBER 29, 2013 (OBAMA FIRES 197 SENIOR MILITARY COMMANDERS IN FIVE YEARS (37 Four Star Generals)!
3.OBAMA FIRES 9 COMMANDING GENERALS IN 2013!
What the president calls “my military” is being cleansed of any officer suspected of disloyalty to or disagreement with the administration on matters of policy or force structure, leaving the compliant and fearful.
SO WHAT TRUMP IS SAYING IS THAT OBAMA STRIPPED THE BEST GENERALS OUT OF THE SYSTEM AND REPLACED THEM WITH SECOND STRINGERS THAT BOWED TO OBAMA AND HIS ANTI-AMERICAN MILITARY AGENDA!
We recognize President Obama is the commander-in-chief and that throughout history presidents from Lincoln to Truman have seen fit to remove military commanders they view as inadequate or insubordinate. Turnover in the military ranks is normal, and in these times of sequestration and budget cuts the numbers are expected to tick up as force levels shrink and missions change.
Yet what has happened to our officer corps since President Obama took office is viewed in many quarters as unprecedented, baffling and even harmful to our national security posture. We have commented on some of the higher profile cases, such as Gen. Carter Ham. He was relieved as head of U.S. Africa Command after only a year and a half because he disagreed with orders not to mount a rescue mission in response to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack in Benghazi.
OBAMA PROMISED TO DISMANTLE OUR ARMED FORCES BACK IN 2010!
Obama Promised to Dismantle Our Armed Forces back in 2010, and for his whole reign of terror has destroyed our position in the world, and our ally’s!
Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barrack Obama outlining his plans for America’s national defense. Obama’s presentation demonstrates either total naiveté about important national security programs or he is just pandering for votes among the extreme left.
I’m the only major candidate to oppose this war from the beginning and as president I will end it.” No one likes war: especially those who have to do the fighting and dying. Yet, our military leaders make clear that the consequences of a rapid withdrawal from Iraq as Obama seeks would be disastrous not only for American interests in the region but for Iraq itself. It would provide a propaganda victory for al Qaeda and Iran because they will be able to claim they defeated America. Further, it could worsen the Iraqi civil war, create an unstable Mideast and further spike oil prices.
“Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.” Anyone who has worked with the military for any length of time knows there is waste, often in weapons systems. Recently, the Government Accountability Office found that 95 major weapons systems — including the Joint Strike Fighter and the Littoral Combat Ship — have exceeded their original budgets. These cost overruns could be the result of waste or mismanagement or, perhaps, the development and fielding of sophisticated new weapons with constantly changing requirements is difficult and inefficient.
“I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.
"I will not weaponize space.” America’s current policy is not to weaponize space.
“I will slow our development of future combat systems.”
“… and I will institute an independent defense priorities board to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.”
“To seek that goal I will not develop new nuclear weapons.” That’s dangerous.
I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material…” Nations capable of producing nuclear weapons produce fissile material for their atomic arsenals.
“… and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair trigger alert…”
“… and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.”
Senator Obama’s national security views expressed in his 52-second video reflect that of a knee-jerk liberal academic who thinks that the US is the primary threat to world peace. His views are dangerously naive and his statements suggest a shallow understanding of national security issues and in some cases his facts are wrong.
Obama called ISIS the JV Team, told us they were on the run, and continually, with the help of John Kerry, lying to the American people for the sake of his own legacy!
DOES ANYBODY OUT THERE REALLY BELIEVE THAT HILLARY ISN’T GOING TO CONTINUE ON WITH OBAMA’S ANTI-AMERICAN MILITARY PRESENSE IN THE WORLD AND TEAR DOWN OUR NATIONS DEFENSES?
EVEN GEORGE BUSH’S MESSAGE WARNED OBAMA WHAT WOULD HAPPEN, BUT OBAMA KNOWS BEST, RIGHT? …PLEASE KNOW THAT I’M NOT A BIG FAN OF THE MESSENGER, BUT IT IS WHAT IT IS…!
https://youtu.be/84ukJlcpqEY
It is hard to imagine a policy more irresponsible, or worse from a moral standpoint. Yet it has been the long-standing policy of Obama and Kerry — and it was Secretary of State Clinton’s, too, until her last weeks in office, when she finally seemed to be getting serious, only to have her new plans thrown out by Kerry. Fanning a rebellion just up to the point where the country is bleeding continuously — what could be more horrible? As the saying goes, “It is worse than a crime, it is a mistake.” Worse, because it keeps compounding the crime, as a matter of principle. But absurd behaviors often have their causes in beliefs. This policy has been a logical product of the attitudes and ideologies of the Obama administration: anti-anti-Islamism, moral posturing, moral inversion — enthusiasm about toppling allies like Mubarak, nervousness about toppling adversaries like Assad — and, under the guise of peace, an ideological neutralism directed against one’s own side, something very different from an honestly neutral objectivity.
There are several other self-defeating U.S. policies that have nurtured the rise of the Islamic State, directly and indirectly. They go beyond Syria; indeed, they span the entire Mideast:
1. The “little and late” character of the current air strikes in Iraq.
The U.S. for months ignored Iraq’s requests for help. It just let the Islamic State keep growing. The belated help has been minimalist, and it is given a false, self-limiting rationale. Militarily, the refusal to put boots on the ground means that we lack the guidance needed for fully effective air strikes. Politically, Obama has relied on Iraq’s democratic parliamentary process to make essential changes, and the most it has been capable of delivering is another leader from within Maliki’s Shi’a party, hardly a good beginning for winning back Sunni trust. What was plainly needed was a figure from Ayad Allawi’s mixed Shia-Sunni party instead.
2. The prior complete withdrawal from Iraq.
This compounded the mistake of the Bush administration in destabilizing Iraq, while undoing Bush’s self-corrective measure, the surge. Obama argues that he had to withdraw, after failing to get a new status-of-forces agreement, but that failure was far from a mere objective fact. Obama did not keep pushing by the usual methods that have gotten America status-of-forces agreements and allowed us to keep adequate long-term residual forces on the ground elsewhere. He was too interested in satisfying his domestic base with a total withdrawal.
You can’t really just blame Bush and Obama alone, but this year’s Obama’s continuation candidate, Hillary Clinton, who like always seems to be somewhere hiding in the background of every contentious encounter with the evil in the world. The cause of ISIS was not only her feckless ability to negotiate the troop withdrawal as Secretary of State in Iraq, which would have been her job, but also bungled the gun running to the rebels against Syria’s Assad which ended up arming and funding the upstart ISIS…Oh, don’t forget the missing $6 Billion that went missing or lost at the same time!~~The National Review
Don't forget to follow While You Were Sleeping on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks
No comments:
Post a Comment