ANSWER: OBAMA, HILLARY, PELOSI, SCHUMER, AND KEITH ELLISON! QUESTION:

By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and Friends of America!

ANSWER: OBAMA, HILLARY, PELOSI, SCHUMER, AND KEITH ELLISON! QUESTION:

WHO WERE THE LAST POLITICIANS IN AMERICA HISTORY TO BETRAY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS, THE RULE OF LAW, AND OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLICS CONSTITUTION?

The American people have been lied to over the last 8 years, and been subjected to broken promises, broken laws, the shrinking of what use to be, but probably still is, the most powerful military in the world, open borders, a globalist agenda, where the only losers financially in the world are the American people, and that’s because Obama got the keys to America’s assets and cash to fund his Socialist transformation of America, which by the way, is the only country that had the ability to finance his unconstitutional blatant disrespect for the constitution by Obama changing, through Executive order and Presidential Memoranda, our immigration laws, and using taxpayer's dollars to fast track America's status to that of a 3rd world country, and financing the unvetted illegal immigrants and refugees who don't necessarily have America's best interest at heart, but are being used by Obama's under the radar's transformation of America to Socialism!

Report: $1 Billion in Social Security Benefits Paid to People Without SSN

Do you ever wonder what happens to your social security deduction after it is removed from your check each month?

According to a new finding  by the Washington Free Beacon, the Social Security Administration paid $1 billion in benefits to individuals who did not have a Social Security Number.  In an audit released Friday, thousands of payments were being made to people who had no SSN on file. 

However, the IRS defended there position, saying that someone without a SSN is still able to receive benefits. ~~By Justin Holcomb, a Friend of America!  

America has been financially drained because of Obama's agenda to drive as many Americans he can on to the welfare and entitlement rolls so that they become dependent, and if you don’t believe me just check out the jobs that have been sucked out of our economy, the unvetted illegal immigrants and refugees that are on the taxpayer’s back, and the historical levels of poverty, levels of people on welfare,  and the 95+ millions of Americans that are out of work or gave up looking altogether because there are no jobs.

Obama managed to drive people on to the welfare rolls in the attempt to control the masses at the expense of the taxpayers and corporations that were driven out because of regulations and the 35% corporate tax rate, the highest in the world! These corporations are obviously loving to be opening in new markets around the world where the labor and taxes are cheaper, and offer their goods and services tax free back to Americans at cheaper prices then can be manufactured here at home, but also believe they would prefer the safety element of staying here at home on American soil, and not having to deal with the insecurity of foreign governments to protect them from the terrorist expansion due to the Hillary years at Secretary of State, and Obama's 'Red Line' feckless foreign policy!   

America pays import and border taxes to other countries on everything that is produced here and sent overseas, or across our neighbors to the North and to the South, but these same countries products are not charged import and border taxes on their products and services which makes American made products and services unable to compete in America's own markets!

Call it for whatever you want, affirmative America first action, sticking up for the American people, being loyal to our founding fathers, or just expecting to be treated as equal, but either way you slice it, it’s Trump’s ‘America First’ promises and executing those promises through his cabinet picks consisting of the highest qualified men who represent the American Dream, their American Dream accomplishments, and wanting to be a part of making America great again!

While the Progressive left flounders on the brink of extinction I can only hope that from the ashes from the old Democratic Party is built an equally patriotic pro-American political Party, that believes in the constitution and its blue print for what’s been the greatest country in the world for the last 2 centuries, but the current leadership and party focus hasn’t changed since the 2016 election, and with the base keeping Pelosi and Harry Reid’s obstructionist clone, Chuck-e Schumer to lead the Democrat/Socialist party into the future, I don’t see any light at the end of that tunnel. I would love to see a second version of the "America First' Party, a.k.a. Republican Party to keep the checks and balances in place like the old days centrist's model when both sides followed the rule of law, and our Constitutional Republic's guide book known as the Constitution!
The Republican Party egotistical elites, fought tooth and nail but finally came around on the side of the mandated ‘Will’ of the American people, and their choice to lead America into the future, and that, as you know, was outsider non-politician, Donald J. Trump and his America First game plan to make America great again!

We have a real disconnect when it comes to the perceived role of Nancy Pelosi, Chuck-e Schumer, and the supposed ex-President’s belief in the oath of office he took when he became a two-time Presidential winner. The first time he won he was just hiding slightly under the radar with his transformation to Socialism, but when he used voter fraud in my 'new' home state of Ohio back in the 2012 election to win, and then told the Russian President, as we learned as the result of an open mic, that he would have more flexibility because he wouldn’t be able to run again due to term limits, you had to know that he was up to no good, and in his mind and the minds of his coconspirators,  given the full steam ahead green light on his unconstitutional original game plan without having to pull any punches. ~~

Click here>  PELOSI AGAIN SHOWING HER PARTY HOW CAPABLE SHE TRULY IS!

Obstructionist Chuck-e Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, and believe it or not, the 9^Th circuit court of appeals, are defending the indefensible when they already knew that the religion of Islam and America’s Christianity, and Constitutional Republic’s mandate would never be accepted or tolerated by the laws and religious belief of the Islamic religion, but chose not to recognize what a capable government and justice system already knew, and actually passed a law to keep America safe for future generations……  So, should the 9^th circuit court of appeals, that is completely manned by judges that are radical progressive representatives that are using unconstitutional interpretation to break an existing law be removed from the bench of the country that they are supposedly serving? Should they also be held to the same oath to serve and protect when it came to the constitution, just like the President of the United States did, but chooses to ignore:

"I, ________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter, So help me God."

ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952, BUT YOU’RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW IT, AND PROBABLY ONE OF THE REASON OBAMA WENT ON HIS APOLOGY TOUR IN HIS FIRST TERM!

The ‘Agenda Journalists’ and their bosses, the ‘Paid to Report’ Media didn’t inform the public of this, and denied it through the use of ‘Fake News,’ and to this very continue to hide from the public what’s going on is Sweden, Germany, France, and all other countries that have been overrun by Islamic Radical terrorists who are actually being funded by those countries very own welfare and subsides programs that are expected, and come hand in hand with Socialism and the Socialist ideologies that they believe!

ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952 but Obama doesn’t want you to know that, nor does he respect or uphold US law.

The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization and nationality for the United States.

That Act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of aliens to the US and remains in effect today.

Among the many issues, it covers, one in particular found in Chapter 2, Section 212, is the prohibition of entry in to the US if the alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by force, violence or by other unconstitutional means.”

This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States but this law is being ignored by the White House.

Islamic immigration to the United States would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam which is antithetical to the United States government, the Constitution and to the Republic.

All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government.

Now the politically correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the United States because Islam is a ‘religion.’

Whether it is a ‘religion’ is immaterial because the law states that aliens who are affiliated with any organization that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited.

YOU HAVE TO WONDER WHY THIS SIMPLE LAW WAS BEING IGNORED BY THE NOT ONLY THE PRESIDENT, BUT BY THE COURTS WHO JUST TOLD TRUMP HIS EO WAS AIMED AT MUSLIMS........SAY WHAT, AND NOW THE DEMS. ARE CONSIDERING MAKING KEITH ELLISON THEIR LEADER!

Now that you understand why I hesitate to believe anything that the ‘Paid to Report’ Media prints or says on Television, you should know about Keith Ellison, the next probable head of the DNC/SNC!  I don’t know if you’re going to believe this, but after having a President whose loyalties were with Islam and the opening our borders to their followers that didn’t have a chance in hell of assimilating, and so recognized by our elected officials back in 1952, who were actually doing the job that they were elected to do, and keeping America safe, and now we have…....Keith Ellison….ta da….

Ellison embodies the identity politics on which the Democrats have staked so much of their success. As a black Muslim in a one-party town with a left-wing newspaper (Minneapolis's Star Tribune), it has served him well. Ellison has been insulated from the kind of media scrutiny that his checkered past would have received elsewhere.

Although there are practical political grounds for doubting that Ellison is the man to lead the Democrats back to power, that is an issue for Democrats. The case against Ellison that should concern all Americans is moral. To borrow a term, he is a bad hombre.

When I speak about Ellison in the Twin Cities, I give a talk titled "The Secret History of Keith Ellison." The title is facetious. Ellison's history only became "secret" when he ran for Congress in 2006 and bet his campaign on three lies about his involvement with the Nation of Islam. I recounted and recalled Ellison's "secret history" in the WEEKLY STANDARD articles "Louis Farrakhan's First Congressman" and "The Ellison Elision."

Yet Ellison's history as an active member and local leader of the Nation of Islam remains a deep secret to Ellison's constituents in his district. He blatantly lied about it when he was running in the 2006 DFL primary. He suppressed it in his 2014 memoir, My Country, 'Tis of Thee. Indeed, in his memoir he presented himself as a critic of Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam.

Speaking of Farrakhan, Ellison writes in his memoir: "He could only wax eloquent while scapegoating other groups." Ellison writes of the Nation of Islam itself: "In the NOI, if you're not angry in opposition to some group of people (whites, Jews, so-called 'sellout' blacks), you don't have religion."

He should know. He was speaking from his own personal experience in the cult.

Ellison was not happy when the Star Tribune published my column "Ellison remembers to forget" on its opinion page. In the column, I restored some of his own history that he had left out of his memoir. He promptly sent out a fundraising letter to his fans asserting that my column represented "a new low" in the manifestation of anti-Muslim bigotry against him.

The cry of bigotry was another lie, but Ellison invited St. Paul Pioneer Press political reporter Rachel Stassen-Berger and others on his email list to fight back against his alleged victimization with a modest contribution to his campaign. I posted a copy of his fundraising letter to Stassen-Berger in "In which Keith Ellison finds me of use."

How has Ellison gotten away with his act? It helps to be a Democrat. It helps to be black. It helps to be a Muslim. It helps to have a sympathetic press. It helps to play to a Minneapolis crowd in a one-party town. And yet Ellison seeks to take his act to a national audience. He dreams of higher office.

In his memoir, Ellison recounts his conversion to Islam as a 19-year-old undergraduate at Detroit's Wayne State University. By the time, Ellison graduated from law school at the University of Minnesota, however, he was toeing the Nation of Islam line. When Ellison first ran for public office in Minneapolis in 1998, he was a self-identified member of the Nation of Islam going under the name Keith Ellison-Muhammad.

Ellison was still talking up "Minister Farrakhan" at a National Lawyers Guild fundraiser for former Symbionese Liberation Army terrorist Kathleen Soliah/Sara Jane Olson in 2000. By 2002, however, when Ellison was first elected to the Minnesota legislature, and 2006, when he sought the DFL endorsement to succeed Sabo in Congress, Ellison had abandoned the Nation of Islam and returned to the fold of Islam.

So far as I know, Ellison is the only convert to Islam for whom Islam has served as a way station to the Nation of Islam. How did that work? That's one part of Ellison's secret history that actually remains secret. ~~By Scott W. Johnson, a Friend of America!

OBAMA WAS HAND-PICKED AND ‘NOT’ A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN- CONGRESS KNEW IT AND PROTECTED HIM!!

IS IT BECAUSE OF THE IMPROBABLE POSSIBILITIES OF A MUSLIM, ISIS MEMBER, OR SOME UNPATRIOTIC ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL WORLD ORDER MEMBER BYPASSING THE CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENT IS ALREADY BEING SLATED TO BE A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE DOWN THE ROAD, AND BECAUSE OF THIS WILL SET A PRECEDENT, AND ALLOWED TO DO SO???

It was the fear of foreign influence invading the Office of Commander in Chief of the military that prompted John Jay, our first U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice, to write to George Washington the following letter dated July 25, 1787: “Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen (underlying "born" in the original). Jay’s recommendation did make it into the Constitution. Article II, Sec. 1, cl. 5 of the Constitution provides in pertinent part: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President. . .” In this clause and in Articles I, III, and IV, the Founding Fathers distinguished between "Citizen" and "natural born Citizen." Per the Founders, while Senators and Representatives can be just “citizens,” the President must be a "natural born Citizen." Through this clause, the Founders sought to guarantee that the ideals for which they fought would be faithfully preserved for future generations of Americans. The Founders wanted to assure that the Office of President and Commander in Chief of the Military, a non-collegial and unique and powerful civil and military position, was free of all foreign influence and that its holder has sole and absolute allegiance, loyalty, and attachment to the U.S. The “natural born Citizen” clause was the best way for them to assure this.

That the “natural born Citizen” clause is based on undivided allegiance and loyalty can be seen from how the Founders distinguished between "citizen" and "natural born Citizen." This distinction is based on the law of nations which became part of our national common law. According to that law as explained by E. Vattel in, _The Law of Nations_ (1758), Vol.1, Section 212, Des Citoyens et Naturels, a "citizen" is a member of the civil society. To become a "citizen" is to enter into society as a member thereof. On the other hand, Vattel wrote that a native or indigenes (written in French as /les naturels/ or /indigenes/) or “natural born Citizen” as the term later became translated from French into English, is a child born in the country of two citizen parents who have already entered into and become members of the society. Vattel also tells us that it is the “natural born Citizen” who will best preserve and perpetuate the society. This definition of the two distinct terms has been adopted by many United States Supreme Court decisions. (The Venus, 12 U.S. 253 (1814) and Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874) to cite just two.) With the presidential qualification question never being involved, neither the 14th Amendment (which covers only "citizens" who are permitted to gain membership in and enter American society by either birth on U.S. soil or by naturalization and being subject to the jurisdiction of the United States), nor Congressional Acts (8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401), nor any case law (e.g. U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)) has ever changed the original common law definition of a “natural born Citizen.” This amendment and laws have all dealt with the sole question of whether a particular person was going to be allowed to enter into and be a member of American society and thereby be declared a "citizen." The 14th Amendment did not involve Article II, let alone define what a “natural born Citizen” is. Never having been changed, the original constitutional meaning of a "natural born Citizen" prevails today. We can also see from these definitions that a “citizen” could have more than one allegiance and loyalty (acquiring allegiance from one’s foreign parents or from foreign soil) but a “natural born Citizen” can have only one and that is to America (soil and parents are all united in one nation).

The original definition of "natural born Citizen" gives our Constitutional Republic the best chance of having a President and Commander in Chief of the Military who has sole and absolute allegiance, loyalty, and attachment to the United States. By satisfying all conditions of this definition, all other avenues of acquiring other foreign citizenships and allegiances (jus soli or by the soil and jus sanguinis or by descent) are cut off. Having all other means of acquiring other foreign citizenships or allegiances cut off is unity of citizenship which is what the President must have at the time of birth. Additionally, by requiring the child’s parents to be U.S. citizens best assures that those parents most likely will have absorbed American customs and values which, in turn, they will transmit to their child.

 

The “natural born Citizen” clause serves a critical purpose today and must be enforced in every Presidential election. The President has immense power, both civil and military. The clause assures the American people that their President does not have any conflicting allegiances or loyalties. In our nuclear world, it will avoid having a President who may hesitate to act quickly and decisively in a moment of crisis due to some internal psychological conflict of allegiance or loyalty. It will avoid any foreign nation expecting and pressuring the President to act in their best interest instead of that of America. The clause gives the American people the best chance that they will not be attacked from within through the Office of President. Knowing the President is a “natural born Citizen,” the American people will trust their President with their lives. Finally, such a President can expect that the military will give him or her full trust and obedience.

When President Obama was born in 1961, under the British Nationality Act of 1948, both his father and he were British subjects/citizens. In 1963, they both became Kenyan citizens. In fact, Mr. Obama’s father was never even a legal resident or immigrant of America. Hence, regardless of where Mr. Obama was born or that he may be a United States citizen under the 14th Amendment, he is not an Article II “natural born Citizen” and not eligible to be President. This ineligibility has absolutely nothing to do with his race or class but all to do with his being born with multiple citizenships and allegiances and not satisfying the strict eligibility requirements of Article II. If someone believes that today the “natural born Citizen” clause no longer serves any useful purpose, then the proper way to change or abandon it is by way of constitutional amendment under Article V of the Constitution, not by usurpation. ~~by: Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

OBAMA IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, AND WE AS AMERICANS SHOULD HAVE CARED AFTER THE 8 YEARS OF HIS OBVIOUS ATTEMPT TO SABABOTAGE THE ‘WILL’ OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS, AND THE GUIDELINES SET FORTH IN THE CONSTITUTION!!

THE RESULTS HAVE BEEN DEVASTATING TO NOT ONLY AMERICA, BUT TO OUR ALLIES AROUND THE WORLD, OUR MILITARY’S ONCE EXCEPTIONAL STANDING IN THE WORLD! 

OBAMA’S FATHER WAS NEVER A CITIZEN, A MUSLIM, AND BURIED AS ONE! WHICH MAKES OBAMA NEVER ABLE, WITHOUT INSIDE HELP, TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DUE TO, NOT THE BIRTHER ISSUE, BUT THE CONSTITUTIONAL CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENT TO BECOME PRESIDENT! 

With the current threat of Facebook's feckless ability to be bipartisan, feel free to befriend me at 'Jonathan E P Moore' to get direct and instant access, or follow 'While You Were Sleeping' at www.whileyouweredozing.blogspot.com Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Google Plus, and PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.