By Jonathan E.P. Moore
FBI DIRECTOR, JAMES COMEY, SAYS HILLARY CLINTON WAS ‘EXTREMELY’ CARELESS!!
In legal circles the term CARELESS MEANS 1) negligent. 2) the opposite of careful. A careless act can result in liability for damages to others, and extremely careless means grossly negligent, and in the case of Hillary Clinton, she should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and for the American People!!!
According to 18 U.S. Code 793 (f), the law carries a maximum 10-year prison sentence for someone who: "entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document... through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody."
Giuliani said there's no reference in the law to willful intent — just to gross negligence. And he pointed out that the FBI director specifically said Tuesday that the former secretary of state's email setup was extremely careless — which, Giuliani said, meets the textbook legal definition of gross negligence.
THE STING? NICELY PLAYED JAMES COMEY!! THE BALL IS NOW BACK IN LORETTA LYNCH’S COURT, WILL SHE DRIBBLE, OR PASS THE BALL OFF TO PRESIDENT OBAMA?
THE SET UP: OUR JUDGEMENT IS THAT NO ‘REASONABLE PROSECUTOR’ WOULD BRING SUCH A CASE! Hmmm, does that mean that Loretta Lynch is going to take the FBI’s recommendations, or apply the law. Is Loretta Lynch the Attorney General or just a reasonable Prosecutor, only time will tell!!...Do you think it’s time, unlike Holder, for Loretta Lynch to appoint a special prosecutor?
With James Comey delivering a scathing report about what the FBI found with the handling of Hillary Clinton and her personal server, He already knows there are bigger fish to fry with the Clinton Foundation and Benghazi, which were not included in this report, so instead gave Hillary a free pass because of the pressure from Loretta Lynch and her boss Barack Obama to release his findings about the emails before Obama went out on the road with Hillary to campaign!
Comey refuses to be part of this charade, especially when he knows the Loretta Lynch will not recommend and indictment!! Comey has an unblemished reputation on both sides of the aisle of professionalism and dedication to his job, and to the American People! It’s more than apparent to me that Comey was forced to adhere to the Obama time line which didn’t give him enough time to dot his ‘I, s,’ or cross his ‘T s,’ and because of that decided to lay out his rushed undisputed criminal facts about the case against Hillary Clinton! The first clue, like all have observed of his actions in the past, was he didn’t take the time to answer any questions from the press, like he has always done in the past, and walked off the stage!!
The trap is set for the Obama ‘lap dog’ Loretta Lynch and
the question of whether to follow the FBI recommendation, and not the law! Will
she detect the trap and indict Hillary, or prove her blind loyalty to Obama and
expose her agenda of the same deceit and divisiveness that is portrayed by
Obama, and the presumptive Socialist Nominee, Hillary “The Crook’ Clinton?
If you didn’t see the announcement by FBI Director James Comey, let me fill you in. Comey presented some news that should have backed a recommendation for the indictment against Hillary Clinton, but he balked!! Did he not pursue it because he knew Obama could override and Pardon Hillary down the road, or defer to a new administration who will, unlike Obama, appoint special prosecutors to go back and go after Lois Lerner, Eric Holder, and himself for bypassing the Congress and Constitution?
FBI: Everything Hillary Said About Emails Was a Lie. But No Prosecution
FBI director James Comey announced on Tuesday morning that he would not be recommending that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton be prosecuted for mishandling classified information. But in the course of his presentation, he demonstrated that literally everything she and her campaign had told America about her email servers was a complete lie.
1. FALSE: Hillary Clinton never sent any classified
information, or emails containing information marked “classified.” Comey
concluded that “a very small number of the e-mails containing classified
information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information.”
He also noted: “even if information is not marked ‘classified’ in an e-mail,
participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are
still obligated to protect it.” And he noted: From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the
State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the
owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or
received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at
the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time;
and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of
classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were
“up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not
been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
2. FALSE: Hillary Clinton turned over all work-related emails to the State Department. Comey: “The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014.” He added that Clinton’s lawyers left those out because they “did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails.” And he added that : “three of those [deleted e-mails] were classified at the time they were sent or received.”
3. FALSE: Hillary Clinton was allowed to use a private e-mail server. Comey noted that “any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for” some of the information she was sharing. And he concluded that she was “extremely careless” with classified information, though he would not recommend prosecution.
4. FALSE: Hillary Clinton’s server was not hacked by foreign adversaries. Clinton claimed it was impossible that her server was hacked. But Comey said: “She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.”
5. FALSE: Hillary Clinton had only used a single mobile device for email. Comey noted the use of multiple e-mail devices, and multiple servers: “Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain.”
If anything demonstrates intent, it is surely Clinton’s
repeated evasion of the law, and her constant lies and cover-ups.
But the Department of Justice will certainly decline to prosecute, meaning that only the voters can keep Hillary Clinton out of office.
'Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before deciding whether to bring charges.'
The U.S. Justice Department has the final say, but Attorney General Loretta Lynch said last week that she 'fully expects' to act on whatever the FBI recommends. Is her job to listen to the recommendations of the FBI, or apply the law to what the investigation exposes?
“If the evidence that the FBI collected about Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email account and server did not constitute gross negligence, what set of facts would cause the FBI to recommend criminal charges under the gross negligence standard?”
'EXTREMELY CARELESS' - WHAT FBI SAID HILLARY DID!
'Extremely careless' with 'very sensitive, highly classified information'
Had 110 emails in private server with classified information
Oversaw 'generally lacking' security culture
Server had no 24-hour security
Emailed work information overseas while in countries with 'sophisticated adversaries' prone to snoop
'Hostile actors' gained access to people she contacted
Even private service like Gmail has better protection
BY THE NUMBERS: THE FBI'S INVESTIGATION
30,000: Rough number of Clinton emails the FBI read – but those are just the ones she didn't delete
110: Clinton emails containing material that was classified at the time she sent or received them
52: Separate email chains that included those 110 messages
3: Emails Clinton never gave the State Department which contained material classified at the time she sent or received them
2,000: Emails containing material that was 'up-classified' after the fact even though it wasn't classified at the time she sent or received them
'A very small number': Emails on Clinton's private server that were marked classified at the time she sent or received them.
'We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial email accounts of people with whom secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account,' Comey explained.
The negligence Comey outlined in his statement to reporters could have been enough to result in a criminal prosecution.
But Clinton's conduct amounted to mere sloppiness, he said.
As for the strength of the evidence . . . what more evidence do you need? There were not one but apparently several unsecured servers set up and paid for by Mrs. Clinton to house and transmit classified information. Comey said she was “extremely careless.” Is that just a tick below “gross negligence”? What am I missing? I don’t think she was disloyal to the United States, I just think she was more loyal to herself – and she got away with it. Comey strongly suggests that if she’d been some staffer at the State Department she’d probably be fired or otherwise sanctioned. But that’s not an option now. Instead, she gets the green light for her party’s nomination for president of the United States. You can be sure that in a future Clinton administration she would impose such sanctions on the peons who worked for her. Comey has played his part in putting Clinton above the law. Maybe he had no choice for reasons I don’t completely understand. But that doesn’t mean this whole spectacle isn’t disgusting.
'Although we did not find clear evidence that sec Clinton or
her colleagues intended to violate laws,' Comey said, 'there is evidence that
they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly
classified information.'
Comey said the FBI determined that before Clinton deleted tens of thousands of her 'personal' emails, her attorneys deleted several work-related messages. The lawyers didn't read them all but searched keywords to determine which of them might qualify as government records.
Comey's conclusion, which he insisted no politician in the Obama administration was aware of in advance, amounted to a declaration that Clinton and her aides were 'extremely careless' with their handling of classified material, but their actions did not rise to the level of a prosecution.
'None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system,' Comey said.
'Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case!!
Do you remember how justice Roberts of the Supreme Court ruled intent instead of the ‘Letter of the Law’ when deciding that Obamacare subsides, even though stated must be distributed on the state level only, used intent to bypass the law and issue subsides if using the government and not state agencies!
House Speaker Paul Ryan said Comey's announcement
"defies explanation." "No one should be above the law,"
Ryan said in a statement. "But based upon the director's own statement, it
appears damage is being done to the rule of law. Declining to prosecute
Secretary Clinton for recklessly mishandling and transmitting national security
information will set a terrible precedent."
HOW CAN HILLARY GET BY A POSSIBLE SECURITY CLEARANCE NOW, AND STILL BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, WHEN HER SECURITY CREDENTIALS SHOULD AND PROBABLY BE REVOKED!!!
If James Comey says "there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information." And list some of, if not most outrageous violations that only common sense can identify as being so, then how can Hillary Clinton, the Socialist presumptive nominee pass a background check, or a security clearance test without further investigation, by a special prosecutor to become President of the United States??
That along with her Alinskyite continuation of Obama’s vision of America, and her using her own version of Obama's famous “Pen and Phone’ should scare the sh*t out of every American no matter what race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political party affiliation!!!
FBI DIRECTOR, JAMES COMEY, SAYS HILLARY CLINTON WAS ‘EXTREMELY’ CARELESS!!
In legal circles the term CARELESS MEANS 1) negligent. 2) the opposite of careful. A careless act can result in liability for damages to others, and extremely careless means grossly negligent, and in the case of Hillary Clinton, she should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and for the American People!!!
According to 18 U.S. Code 793 (f), the law carries a maximum 10-year prison sentence for someone who: "entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document... through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody."
Giuliani said there's no reference in the law to willful intent — just to gross negligence. And he pointed out that the FBI director specifically said Tuesday that the former secretary of state's email setup was extremely careless — which, Giuliani said, meets the textbook legal definition of gross negligence.
THE STING? NICELY PLAYED JAMES COMEY!! THE BALL IS NOW BACK IN LORETTA LYNCH’S COURT, WILL SHE DRIBBLE, OR PASS THE BALL OFF TO PRESIDENT OBAMA?
THE SET UP: OUR JUDGEMENT IS THAT NO ‘REASONABLE PROSECUTOR’ WOULD BRING SUCH A CASE! Hmmm, does that mean that Loretta Lynch is going to take the FBI’s recommendations, or apply the law. Is Loretta Lynch the Attorney General or just a reasonable Prosecutor, only time will tell!!...Do you think it’s time, unlike Holder, for Loretta Lynch to appoint a special prosecutor?
With James Comey delivering a scathing report about what the FBI found with the handling of Hillary Clinton and her personal server, He already knows there are bigger fish to fry with the Clinton Foundation and Benghazi, which were not included in this report, so instead gave Hillary a free pass because of the pressure from Loretta Lynch and her boss Barack Obama to release his findings about the emails before Obama went out on the road with Hillary to campaign!
Comey refuses to be part of this charade, especially when he knows the Loretta Lynch will not recommend and indictment!! Comey has an unblemished reputation on both sides of the aisle of professionalism and dedication to his job, and to the American People! It’s more than apparent to me that Comey was forced to adhere to the Obama time line which didn’t give him enough time to dot his ‘I, s,’ or cross his ‘T s,’ and because of that decided to lay out his rushed undisputed criminal facts about the case against Hillary Clinton! The first clue, like all have observed of his actions in the past, was he didn’t take the time to answer any questions from the press, like he has always done in the past, and walked off the stage!!
If you didn’t see the announcement by FBI Director James Comey, let me fill you in. Comey presented some news that should have backed a recommendation for the indictment against Hillary Clinton, but he balked!! Did he not pursue it because he knew Obama could override and Pardon Hillary down the road, or defer to a new administration who will, unlike Obama, appoint special prosecutors to go back and go after Lois Lerner, Eric Holder, and himself for bypassing the Congress and Constitution?
FBI: Everything Hillary Said About Emails Was a Lie. But No Prosecution
FBI director James Comey announced on Tuesday morning that he would not be recommending that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton be prosecuted for mishandling classified information. But in the course of his presentation, he demonstrated that literally everything she and her campaign had told America about her email servers was a complete lie.
2. FALSE: Hillary Clinton turned over all work-related emails to the State Department. Comey: “The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014.” He added that Clinton’s lawyers left those out because they “did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails.” And he added that : “three of those [deleted e-mails] were classified at the time they were sent or received.”
3. FALSE: Hillary Clinton was allowed to use a private e-mail server. Comey noted that “any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for” some of the information she was sharing. And he concluded that she was “extremely careless” with classified information, though he would not recommend prosecution.
4. FALSE: Hillary Clinton’s server was not hacked by foreign adversaries. Clinton claimed it was impossible that her server was hacked. But Comey said: “She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.”
5. FALSE: Hillary Clinton had only used a single mobile device for email. Comey noted the use of multiple e-mail devices, and multiple servers: “Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain.”
But the Department of Justice will certainly decline to prosecute, meaning that only the voters can keep Hillary Clinton out of office.
'Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before deciding whether to bring charges.'
The U.S. Justice Department has the final say, but Attorney General Loretta Lynch said last week that she 'fully expects' to act on whatever the FBI recommends. Is her job to listen to the recommendations of the FBI, or apply the law to what the investigation exposes?
“If the evidence that the FBI collected about Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email account and server did not constitute gross negligence, what set of facts would cause the FBI to recommend criminal charges under the gross negligence standard?”
'EXTREMELY CARELESS' - WHAT FBI SAID HILLARY DID!
'Extremely careless' with 'very sensitive, highly classified information'
Had 110 emails in private server with classified information
Oversaw 'generally lacking' security culture
Server had no 24-hour security
Emailed work information overseas while in countries with 'sophisticated adversaries' prone to snoop
'Hostile actors' gained access to people she contacted
Even private service like Gmail has better protection
30,000: Rough number of Clinton emails the FBI read – but those are just the ones she didn't delete
110: Clinton emails containing material that was classified at the time she sent or received them
52: Separate email chains that included those 110 messages
3: Emails Clinton never gave the State Department which contained material classified at the time she sent or received them
2,000: Emails containing material that was 'up-classified' after the fact even though it wasn't classified at the time she sent or received them
'A very small number': Emails on Clinton's private server that were marked classified at the time she sent or received them.
'We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial email accounts of people with whom secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account,' Comey explained.
The negligence Comey outlined in his statement to reporters could have been enough to result in a criminal prosecution.
But Clinton's conduct amounted to mere sloppiness, he said.
As for the strength of the evidence . . . what more evidence do you need? There were not one but apparently several unsecured servers set up and paid for by Mrs. Clinton to house and transmit classified information. Comey said she was “extremely careless.” Is that just a tick below “gross negligence”? What am I missing? I don’t think she was disloyal to the United States, I just think she was more loyal to herself – and she got away with it. Comey strongly suggests that if she’d been some staffer at the State Department she’d probably be fired or otherwise sanctioned. But that’s not an option now. Instead, she gets the green light for her party’s nomination for president of the United States. You can be sure that in a future Clinton administration she would impose such sanctions on the peons who worked for her. Comey has played his part in putting Clinton above the law. Maybe he had no choice for reasons I don’t completely understand. But that doesn’t mean this whole spectacle isn’t disgusting.
Comey said the FBI determined that before Clinton deleted tens of thousands of her 'personal' emails, her attorneys deleted several work-related messages. The lawyers didn't read them all but searched keywords to determine which of them might qualify as government records.
Comey's conclusion, which he insisted no politician in the Obama administration was aware of in advance, amounted to a declaration that Clinton and her aides were 'extremely careless' with their handling of classified material, but their actions did not rise to the level of a prosecution.
'None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system,' Comey said.
'Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case!!
Do you remember how justice Roberts of the Supreme Court ruled intent instead of the ‘Letter of the Law’ when deciding that Obamacare subsides, even though stated must be distributed on the state level only, used intent to bypass the law and issue subsides if using the government and not state agencies!
HOW CAN HILLARY GET BY A POSSIBLE SECURITY CLEARANCE NOW, AND STILL BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, WHEN HER SECURITY CREDENTIALS SHOULD AND PROBABLY BE REVOKED!!!
If James Comey says "there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information." And list some of, if not most outrageous violations that only common sense can identify as being so, then how can Hillary Clinton, the Socialist presumptive nominee pass a background check, or a security clearance test without further investigation, by a special prosecutor to become President of the United States??
That along with her Alinskyite continuation of Obama’s vision of America, and her using her own version of Obama's famous “Pen and Phone’ should scare the sh*t out of every American no matter what race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political party affiliation!!!
PLEASE DO ME A FAVOR, COPY AND PASTE, REFORMAT, ADD YOUR OWN 2 CENTS AND TAKE OWNERSHIP OF THE ‘WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING’ WORDS, ONLY IF YOU AGREE, AND IF YOU DO AGREE TAKE THE TIME TO SUPPORT ‘AMERICA FIRST’ AND ‘MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!’
Don't forget to follow While You Were Sleeping on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , tumblr PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks
Great post
ReplyDelete