DON'T WANT A JOB, AFFORDABLE HEALTHCARE, BUT WANT SOCIALISM AND OPEN BORDERS, THEN VOTE FOR HILLARY!

By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and friends of America!

DON'T WANT A JOB, AFFORDABLE HEALTHCARE, BUT WANT SOCIALISM AND OPEN BORDERS, THEN VOTE FOR HILLARY!

THERE ARE THREE TYPES OF PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD, THOSE WHO MAKE IT HAPPEN, THOSE WHO WATCH IT HAPPEN, AND THOSE WHO ASKED, WHAT HAPPENED?

**ALREADY BEING REPORTED IN TEXAS THAT TRUMP VOTES ARE REGISTERING FOR HILLARY!**

The ‘fix’ is not about only the Presidential race, but the under card  candidates who are trying to hold on to their existence, and if you care to vet them with just one question, and that being, ‘Do you support Hillary Clinton’s transformation of America to a Socialist 3^rd world country, with open borders, unvetted illegal immigrants and refugees, and he/she answers yes, they should not be in your acceptance wheel house and discarded like the poop bag you use to pick up after your dog’s finest moment!

How obvious is this, I am now hearing that the Democrats, A.K.A., the ‘new’ Socialist Party, is now predicted to win the House and Senate, and blaming Trump for his words, but not the treasonous actions by Hillary against America, and you say?  Are you going to wait one more election cycle, when it will be too late, or err on the side of caution to save our Constitutional Republic?

Times have changed, and we always woke up the day after the election in the same country we went to sleep on the day after the election, but this time is not in that same comfort zone, and

if you’re Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, etc., you won’t be fighting and expressing your beliefs freely anymore under a Hillary continuation policy of Obama! So, put the rhetoric away, put the animosity away, and put America first, or you will never be able to bicker again!

I should laugh, and that’s because I just heard Hillary say that Trump doesn’t know how to defend the Constitution, but her continuation of Obama’s policies will? She has nothing new to add or separate herself from Obama’s policies, and after 30 years hanging around the ‘Hill’ you would think she would know what a classified email would look like, wouldn’t you? It just came out today, that Wikileaks just revealed that Obama ‘did’ know about the illegal server through the emails of Cheryl Mills!

Hillary also just revealed how she knows nothing about business! Trumps tax write offs were related to depreciation and not the running of the business of the Casino! Her empty rhetoric sounds like it’s running on a loop, and the same stories, like her continuation of Obama’s feckless policies, are not going to take America anywhere but down the tubes! A VOTE FOR HILLARY IS A VOTER FOR NO WORK, NO HEALTHCARE, NO BORDERS, THE CONTINUATION OF UNVETTED REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS WHO DON’T BELIEVE OUR CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND AND INVALID, OUR CHRISTIAN RELIGION IS NOT RESPECTED AND A REASON TO MURDER AND BEHEAD, AND OUR WOMEN OF ALL AGES RIGHTS ARE NOT ONLY DEGRADING, BUT DANGEROUS TO THEIR HEALTH!

The traitorous GOP are hiding in the shadows and won’t commit to Trump, the outsider, non-politician who is running this ‘America First’ branch of the Republican Party while running the old guard out of town! Some of these political bosses on both sides of the aisle should be considered for possible charges once the AG, Loretta Lynch for the DOJ, and the head of the FBI, James Comey are asked to step down and escorted off the Hill! 
The GOP bosses are doing to Trump what they did to the ‘Will’ of the American people under Obama, nothing! The party bosses have already taken the money to fast track TPP and by doing

so giving Hillary the access to her own version of Obama’s famous ‘Pen and Phone’ to, like Obama, bypass the congress and use interpretation and intent to nullify the ‘letter of the law’ that is laid out in our constitution!

If anybody thinks that Trump cares about the old GOP guard, who for the last 8 years abandoned their base and joined in with the Democratic/Socialist party to destroy America from within, you’re mistaken! The GOP has already turned their back on Trump and spending that money that should be allocated to the Presidency race, to the under ballot to secure existing seats in both House and Senate, but why? Obama bypassed the House and Senate with that ‘Pen and Phone’ to write unconstitutional Executive Orders and Presidential Memorandums, so, why would they give that same ability to Hillary, unless of course the ‘fix’ was in, and they are in cahoots with the ‘New’ Socialist Party to destroy America from within!
To complete the Obama, dream Hillary must win, and win at all cost! Please take the time to care and understand what’s at stake, and know that the biggest prize for these two Alinskyites (Socialists) is the Supreme Court, and the ability to fill it with progressive left wing radical justices! It’s time we all went for the most exceptional country in the world and our founders, and our founder’s Constitution!
It’s not about our egos that have been intentionally altered through division and deception that’s been initiated through the infusion of ‘Political Correctness,’ and ‘Implicit Bias’ in our everyday lives, but about understanding that to lose the power of the ‘letter law,’ and replacing it with

interpretation and  ‘intent,’ like used by Comey to give Hillary the free pass, by justice Roberts who used ‘intent’ to grant subsides to states with no Obamacare agency enrollees when the letter of the law states that subsides can only  be given to state run Obamacare  agency enrollees!ANOTHER HUGE REVELATION SHOULD NOT ONLY MAKE YOU MAD AS HELL, BUT IF NOT RESOLVED BEFORE THE ELECTION SHOULD MAKE YOU DECISION THAT MUCH EASIER!

REENLISTMENT BONUS SCANDAL! DISGRACEFUL!
Pentagon was forcing thousands of soldiers to return bonuses of $15,000 or more that were doled out more than a decade ago to get them to reenlist for six years and fight in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Obama hasn’t cared for our military and has brought it to levels not realized since 1916! Hillary has nothing in the continuation of Obama’s anti-American agenda in her platform to rebuild our military, and because of that might as well be considered lambs to the slaughter, and with open borders, Sanctuary cities, unvetted immigrants and refugees, and Hillary wanting to up the totals by 550% of additional Syrian refugees, we are not only in big trouble, but possibly a fading footnote some 10 years down the road in the History book of the world!
HILLARY HAS NOTHING IN HER PLAN TO REBUILD OUR MILITARY!

Again, the whole game is for Hillary, at all cost, to get her hands on that ‘Pen and Phone,’ and control of the appointment of Justices to the Supreme Court! You have to know, with the ‘Swamp’ of both political parties on board with that plan for globalism, only Trump give us the only way out! I get it that Trump is not the perfect candidate, but with the world in chaos, and terrorism knocking on our door, if not already in our house, we need to wake up together as Americans,and not Democrats, Republican, Libertarians, and everyone who calls themselves Americans to take our country back from the corruption, deception, and Hillary Clinton’s transformation of America!

Hillary Clinton’s Chilling Version of The Supreme Court!
Hillary Clinton has made it abundantly clear she would do everything in her power to make sure gun control is no longer a possibility, but rather a reality!
Clinton has repeatedly said she believes the Supreme Court was wrong in their interpretation of the Second Amendment. If she doesn’t believe in our basic right to own firearms, we don’t even have to worry about battling her on concealed carry, open carry or even campus carry. We must fight for one of our most basic rights: the right to own and bear arms.
Check out the NRA’s latest video with Clinton’s own words:
HILLARY SAYS 'WORDS' MATTER, AND HER 'WORDS' SHOULD MATTER TO YOU!

Rolling Justice Roberts!
A Clinton ally reveals how the left played the Chief on ObamaCare!
The WikiLeaks email disclosures make fascinating reading about the political calculations of leading progressives, and Chief Justice John Roberts may want to pay attention. This week’s leaks show Hillary Clinton ally Neera Tanden laying out a strategy to intimidate the Supreme Court to uphold ObamaCare.

Ms. Tanden runs the Center for American Progress, the think tank that is essentially an arm of the Clinton campaign. CAP’s former chief, John Podesta, is now the Clinton campaign chairman, and on June 2, 2015 Ms. Tanden sent an email to Jake Sullivan, a key Clinton aide, copying Mr. Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri, another campaign operative. 
The subject line was “King v. Burwell,” the second big legal case contesting the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, three years after the first case in which the Chief sided with the four liberals to uphold the law.

Ms. Tanden wrote that, “As Jennifer will remember, it was pretty critical that the President threw the gauntlet down last time on

the Court, warning them in the first case that it would politicize the role of the Court for them to rule against the ACA. As a close reader of the case, I honestly believe that was vital to scaring Roberts off.”

We wrote at the time about the campaign to mau-mau the Chief, and now we know it was orchestrated. The campaign included a Senate speech by Vermont’s Pat Leahy, a broadside from President Obama about “an unelected group of people” overturning “a duly constituted and passed law,” and articles by such media progressives as Jeffrey Rosen of the New Republic and Jeffrey Toobin of the New Yorker. Mr. Rosen hit the talking points out of the park when he wrote that, “If the Roberts court strikes down health care reform by a 5-4 vote, then the chief justice’s stated goal of presiding over a less divisive court will be viewed as an irredeemable failure.”
In her June 2015 email, Ms. Tanden recommended to her Clinton colleagues that they do the same thing again. “I’m not arguing that Hillary spend a lot of time attacking the Court,” she writes. “I do think it would be very helpful to all of our interest in a decision affirming the law, for [Chief Justice] Roberts and perhaps [Justice Anthony] Kennedy to see negative political consequences to ruling against the government. Therefore, I think it would be helpful to have a story of how progressives and Hillary would make the Supreme Court an election issue (which would be a ready argument for liberals) if the Court rules against the government.”

A similar if less aggressive lobbying campaign did roll out warning the Court against overturning ObamaCare, and, sure enough, the Chief and Justice Kennedy sided with the liberals to uphold the ACA again in King v. Burwell! 
No doubt the Justices will swear that this political pressure had no bearing on their rulings, and maybe so. But Justices are human beings who like to be praised and feted like anyone else. The left knows how to pick soft political targets and it plays

hardball against them. Ms. Tanden won’t comment on the email other than to say that “it’s clear that the Russians are trying to divide us against each other to help Donald Trump.” Her email shows that no matter how cynical you get about progressive methods; it isn’t cynical enough.    ~~Wall Street Journal

Obama’s ‘centrist’ pick to replace Judge Scalia is Judge Garland, and is the Left’s Disdain for Truth!
By their own accounts, the liberal media lied in describing Garland as a centrist.
And the more research one does, the bigger this lie appears.

The mainstream media — that is, the liberal media — share all the views and characteristics of the left. Among these is the left’s view of truth. There are honest individuals with left-wing views, and dishonest individuals on the right. But truth is not a leftist value. Everything the left believes in is more important than truth: social justice, economic equality, reducing carbon emissions, expanding the power of the state, battling sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, racism, and above these, destroying its conservative opposition.

The media’s coverage of President Barack Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court should serve as one of the most blatant examples of both the left-wing orientation of the news media and their willingness to play with truth.

On March 16, the day after Garland’s nomination, every major mainstream news outlet, both print and electronic, depicted the judge as a centrist.
The first sentence of The New York Times front page read: “WASHINGTON — President Obama on Wednesday nominated Merrick B. Garland to be the nation’s 113th Supreme Court justice, choosing a centrist appellate judge.”

Similarly, the Los Angeles Times front-page headline said: “Obama’s choice of popular centrist Merrick Garland for Supreme Court puts GOP to the test.”

Another headline, seen in the Washington Post, read: “Merrick Garland’s instinct for the middle could put him in the court’s

most influential spot.” That same day, the Post published a second article mentioning how “Garland’s deep resume and centrist reputation appear to have positioned him well to earn the president’s nod.”

Two days later, the Los Angeles Times featured a news analysis on its front page, in which a reporter wrote that Garland may be “the most moderate Supreme Court nominee anyone could expect from a Democratic president.” The reporter also calls Garland “a superbly qualified judge with a cautious, centrist record.”

There is no truth to any of these reports — something easily proved by both Judge Garland’s decisions and, amazingly, by the newspapers’ reports themselves.
Take the Los Angeles Times’ front-page “news analysis,” for example. After describing the judge as a moderate and centrist, the LA Times reporter writes:
“If the late Justice Antonin Scalia, a staunch conservative, is replaced by a moderate-to-liberal Justice Garland, the court would tip to the left on several key issues, like abortion, affirmative action, the death penalty, gun control, campaign spending, immigration and environmental protection.”

In other words, the very same author who describes Garland as a centrist believes that Garland votes left on essentially every major issue confronting the nation and the Supreme Court.
Additionally, that very same day The New York Times headlined that Garland is a centrist, it published an article on the nomination

noting that “If Judge Garland is confirmed, he could tip the ideological balance to create the most liberal Supreme Court in 50 years.”
In reviewing Garland’s decisions, this Times piece placed Judge Garland to the left of Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, way to the left of Justice Stephen Breyer and minimally to the right of Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg.

By their own accounts, the liberal media lied in describing Garland as a centrist.
And the more research one does, the bigger this lie appears.
In a column in The Wall Street Journal, Juanita Duggan, President and CEO of the National Federation of Independent Business, wrote that Garland is so anti-small business and so pro-big labor, that “This is the first time in the NFIB’s 73-year-history that we will weigh in on a Supreme Court nominee.”

What worries the NFIB, she explains, is that “in 16 major labor decisions of Judge Garland’s that we examined, he ruled 16-0 in favor of the NLRB (National Labor Relations Board).”
Elsewhere in the Journal, the editorial board wrote that they can’t think of a single issue on which Garland would vote differently from the four liberal Justices that already sit on the bench.
Tom Goldstein wrote in the SCOTUSblog that Garland favors deferring to the decision-makers in agencies. “In a dozen close cases in which the court divided, he sided with the agency every time.”
Another source reads that “Judge Garland would be a reliable fifth vote on these legal issues.”
Those are all the fundamental issues that divide the left from the right.
So, the entire left is lying about Judge Garland, who, for the record, seems like a truly decent man who possesses a first-class mind. They do so because getting a fifth left-wing vote and weakening the Republicans is far more important than truth.

And believe it or not, there is an even worse lesson here, namely the media’s effectiveness in saturating society with its mendacious version of reality. Unless an American makes the effort to study the issue — and most do not — they take

the news media’s version as truth. The terrible lesson, which has been affirmed time and time again since the 1960s, is that a free society can experience brainwashing as effectively as a totalitarian state.

HILLARY SAYS THERE’S ROOM FOR REGULATION IN THE 1^ST AND 2^ND AMENDMENTS!
In June, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos pushed Clinton twice on whether people have a right to own guns. “But that's not what I asked.  I said do you believe that their conclusion that an individual's right to bear arms is a constitutional, right?”  Clinton could only say: “If it is a constitutional right . . ..”
Similarly, in New York City in the fall, she told donors: “The Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment, and I am going to make that case every chance that I get.” In Maryland in April, Chelsea Clinton promised that her mom would appoint to the Supreme Court justices who would overturn past decisions that struck down gun-control measures.  But the only laws that the Supreme Court evaluated were complete gun bans and a law that made it a crime to use a gun.

Washington, D.C., had a complete handgun ban in place until 2008. It was also a felony, punishable by five years in prison, to put a bullet in the chamber of a gun. This amounted to a complete gun ban on using guns for self-defense. The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller struck down that ban.

Clinton told Stephanopoulos her opinion of this ruling: “I think that for most of our history, there was a nuanced reading of the Second Amendment until the decision by the late Justice Scalia.” She continued, “There was no argument until then that localities and states and the federal government had a right, as we do with

every amendment, to impose reasonable regulation.”
Clinton went on to talk about her push for expanded background checks, an issue that was irrelevant to Scalia’s decision in Heller. Instead, the question is why was D.C.’s local gun bans a “reasonable regulation.” Why should people be imprisoned for five years for defending their families?

The media might not like to admit it, but The War on Guns is real. If Hillary wins in November, she will appoint Scalia’s successor and the Supreme Court will overturn the Heller and McDonald decisions.  Make no mistake about it, the government will again be able to ban guns. Her claim that she isn't “looking to take people's guns away” is not consistent with her promise to overturn existing Supreme Court decisions. ~~By John R. Lott

Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
Don't forget to follow While You Were Sleeping on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks!