HILLARY CAN RUN, BUT SHE CAN'T HIDE!!

By Jonathan E.P. Moore

HILLARY CAN RUN, BUT SHE CAN’T HIDE!! 

HIDING HILLARY’S SHADOW IS LARGE, AND VISIBLE, BUT AT THIS STAGE SHE CAN’T RUN BACK INTO HER POLITICALLY CORRUPT HOLE FOR THE NEXT 6 MONTHS!!!!

   

Trump, sweeps all 5 primaries, and why? The answer is because the American People have finally waken up, and why? because they realized that Cruz and Kasich are just as left as Hillary and part of the Socialist/Democrat Bipartisan establishment agenda of taking down America…! If you don’t know why I say that, then check out my posting about Cruz and Kasich on this blog. 

I have a question for all Americans, and that’s why did the only candidates the Dems ran up the flag pole were Socialists? But if you think that Hillary is not a Socialist, then I challenge you to continue reading, and understand why a Hillary Presidency, is a third term for Obama, and his anti-American agenda! Sanders has always been a Socialist, and that fact has always been known from day one, but what is in question is Hillary’s allegiance to her Alinsky roots. The left establishment tried to use Sanders to show the contrast of a true Socialist against how they want Hillary to be viewed and perceived, and that’s a moderate, but if you understand who Hillary truly is you would probably find that she is left of Sanders, and then you will realize that she is not what the ‘Will’ of the American People want, or needed for the future America or our children, or our children’s children!!  

That Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama share an Alinskyite background tells us two things. First, they are leftists, dedicated to overthrowing our Constitutional system. Second, they will go to any length to conceal their radicalism from the public, and with the Media in on the plot, Americans have no clue. 

‘RED FLAGS!!’……..IN PREPARATION OF THE ARRIVAL OF THE WORLD ON AMERICAN SHORES!! 

Did you ever think about why the ACLU became so involved with the separation of church and state? Did you ever wonder why all references to Christianity was removed from public property, and why the ‘10 Commandments’ were stripped out of our courtrooms, and state and local government buildings? Did you ever wonder why our Christian Holidays had to be renamed in a genetic sort of way so not to offend other religions when 77% of America is Christian based, and the majority? 

This new talking point of ‘Transgender bathrooms’ is just another way of distracting Americans from the facts that it's not about the Candidate anymore, and that's because in the old days the two parties were both closer to the middle, but now they are so far apart that the vote is about ideology!! It's either Socialism with large Government involvement in your life, or Capitalism with small Government involvement in your life!.......Can’t get any simpler than that!!.... You can bitch about any of the candidates on either side of the aisle, but by doing so are allowing the Media to play you like fools. You should be checking out the possibility of brokered political party conventions, and the chance that the party could override the public wants, and override the will of the people!! You should be concerned that Hillary won't be held legally for her part in the emails, her Clinton foundation, and Benghazi. Why we all sit around with these pissing contest skirmishes, the 2 political parties are huddling behind closed doors to override the will of the American People...Sorry about that pit stop, but it needed to be said! With ‘Transgender Bathrooms.’ You have to believe that there is the likelihood that bathrooms are not itemized in the middle east, and that same sex bathrooms have been the norm, but thanks to the PC police, who has shot themselves in the foot on this issue, has made the American public aware of the degenerates and pedophiles that roam the streets of America, and who might have an alternative motive while taking advantage of these new PC demands!  

With the corrupt Media’s backing, the PC Police have created a ‘that’s not who we are’ atmosphere and created a self-doubt in the minds of the American people in what they thought was granted rights under the Constitution, and part of ‘who we are’ while living the American Dream! Could it be that all of these issues are not in line with the future unvetted immigrants, and supporting their disdain for the western culture and the freedoms granted by our founding fathers, by the Constitution?

HILLARY WILL BE NOT ONLY LEFT OF SANDERS, BUT FURTHER LEFT THAN OBAMA ON MORE ISSUES THAN NOT!!!....AND ‘GUN CONTROL WILL BE ONE OF HER MAJOR TARGETS!!  

Included in those issues is the continuation of Obama’s Alinsky’s Socialist reform of tearing down the American Constitutional Democratic Republic that she used so well over the last 25 years to fill her bank accounts! She has been selling out our trade secrets through her foundation, and has disregarded the Constitution, our fighting forces, the families of our killed fighting forces, and more than anything, betraying the pride and respect that should come with being an elected or appointed official who represents the United States of America! You have to know that she did everything with the guidance and backing of Obama and his personally picked Czars that only answered to Obama, and assisted him in his establishment backed plans, to eliminate this Republics exceptional reputation in the world! You also have to know that she knew that the FBI investigation into her emails was just a smoke screen, and an olive branch held out by this Bipartisan establishment to the American People to make them think that they really care about the improprieties of our elected officials, and will do what it takes to bring them to justice!!

Hillary, and Obama 3rd term if elected wants American People to depend on the government, while increasing debt, welfare, poverty level, education and her anti American Politically Correct agenda, which includes watering down the 77% of American Christians in order to make all other illegal immigrants and refugees feel inclusion, and by doing so breaking down the symbols that reinforce 77% of America and their religious beliefs. Please know that Hillary will maintain everything that Obama’s Cloward and Piven Strategies, and Alinsky’s 8 steps to Socialism, will keep the borders open wide without any individual being vetted, and by doing so, like Obama, take down America from within. Don’t forget Hillary will not reverse any of Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders or Presidential memorandums, and press on with her agenda of equal pay for women (despite the fact that the Clinton Foundation pays female executives less than their male counterparts), early childhood education, affordable college and debt-free tuition, the Affordable Care Act, mental health, criminal justice reform, and—you guessed it— ‘GUN CONTROL’

With Hillary Clinton having an Alinskyite background tells us two things. First, she is leftist, dedicated to overthrowing our Constitutional system. Second, she will go to any length to conceal their radicalism from the public, and with the Media in on the plot, Americans will continue to have no clue! 

WHY HILLARY’S ALINSKY LETTERS MATTER!! 

Alana Goodman’s revelation at the Washington Free Beacon of previously unknown correspondence between Hillary Clinton and Saul Alinsky shows that Clinton has not been honest about her far-left past. The lost Alinsky letters also remind us of what we ought to know but have forgotten: Hillary is not “Clintonian.” While Bill and Hillary have worked, schemed, and governed as a couple for decades, Hillary has always been to the left of Bill. As president, she would govern more like Obama than like her husband. Hillary Clinton was the Elizabeth Warren of her day, the leader of the left-wing of the Democratic party. Hillary continually pressed Bill from the left during their White House years, while clashing on the inside with Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin and the administration’s Wall Street contingent. 


The difference between Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren is that Warren flaunts her ideology, thrilling the base by making the leftist case as few other Democrats dare. Ever the Alinskyite, Hillary prefers to achieve leftist ends incrementally, in pragmatic guise. It’s a conflict of means rather than ends, the same conflict that leads many leftists to doubt Obama’s ideological credentials, when in fact the president is as much a man of the left as ever.
Alinsky’s original quarrel with the young radicals of the 1960s, which Hillary alludes to in her letter, was over the New Left’s tendency to make noise rather than get things done. Working effectively, Alinsky believed, requires ideological stealth, gradualism, and pragmatic cover. In his day, Alinsky took hits from more openly leftist ideologues for his incrementalist caution, as Obama and Hillary do now. Yet he was no more a centrist than his two most famous acolytes are today.

 Glenn Reynolds links to a tweet in response to the Goodman story by Politico’s Glenn Thrush: “Remind me again why liking Saul Alinsky is unacceptable.” Alright Glenn, and the rest of a Democratic-leaning media that will do everything in its power to play this revelation down, I’ll remind you. Alinsky was a democratic socialist. He worked closely for years with Chicago’s Communist party and did everything in his power to advance its program. Most of his innovations were patterned on Communist-party organizing tactics. Alinsky was smart enough never to join the party, however. From the start, he understood the dangers of ideological openness. He was a pragmatist, but a pragmatist of the far left. (See Chapter Four of Spreading the Wealth for details.)

Hillary Clinton understood all of this. As she noted at the conclusion of her undergraduate thesis on Alinsky, “If the ideals Alinsky espouses were actualized, the result would be social revolution.” In her letter to Alinsky, Hillary says, “I have just had my one-thousandth conversation” about Reveille for Radicals (Alinsky’s first book). Nowadays, people focus on Alinsky’s more famous follow-up, Rules for Radicals. But Reveille, which Hillary knew inside-out, is the more ideologically revelatory work.
HERE'S HOW ALINSKY DEFINED HIS FAVORED POLITICS IN REVEILLE FOR RADICALS: ‘Radicals want to advance from the jungle of laissez-faire capitalism to a world worthy of the name of human civilization. They hope for a future where the means of economic production will be owned by all of the people instead of the comparative handful.’

So Alinsky supported the central Marxist tenet of public ownership of the means of production. Unlike the New Left, however, Alinsky had no expectation of reaching that end through swift or violent revolution. He meant to approach the ultimate goal slowly, piecemeal, perhaps over generations, through patient organizing efforts at the local level.  


Hillary has made much of the fact that she turned away from Alinskyite organizing to seek change from within the political system instead. What these new letters show is that this was also a change of means rather than ends. Hillary’s belief in Alinsky’s goals, and her willingness to adopt and adapt his methods in a political context, remained strong.

 In this, Hillary has much in common with Obama and other modern Alinskyites. Alinsky wanted community organizers to shun electoral politics. Yet, as I showed in Radical-in-Chief, Alinsky’s New Left followers found ways to combine his methods with electoral politics. This synthesis of Alinskyism and electoral politics, pioneered by Alinsky’s acolytes in Chicago, is what inspired Obama’s career. Hillary was part of the same wave. Despite her attempts to use her choice of electoral politics as evidence of distancing from Alinsky, these letters make clear that she never lost the faith. 


Hillary’s newly discovered letter to Alinsky was written while she was doing a summer internship at the left-wing law firm of Treuhaft, Walker, and Bernstein. As Carl Bernstein points out in A Woman in Charge: The Life of Hillary Rodham Clinton, Hillary hasn’t been honest about this episode either. Bernstein quotes Treuhaft saying that of the firm’s four partners, “two were communists, and others tolerated communists.” Yet none acknowledged party membership until years later.  Whether Hillary knew about those memberships or not, the firm was obviously very far on the left. They represented some of the Black Panther Party leadership and other left-wing causes as well. “There was no reason except politics for a girl from Yale” to intern at the firm, Treuhaft told Bernstein. “She certainly . . . was in sympathy with all the left causes,” he continued. Yet as Bernstein notes, in her memoir Hillary took pains to gloss over “anything that could be construed as resembling a radical or leftist past.”  


During her time in Arkansas, Hillary may seem to have moved to the center. The Rose Law Firm, after all, was nothing like Treuhaft, Walker, and Bernstein. It was an establishment law firm representing the most powerful economic interests in the state. With the help of Dick Morris, moreover, Hillary took on the Arkansas teachers’ unions from the right as she led Bill’s education initiative during his final governorship. In retrospect, all of this was largely pragmatic positioning. When Hillary finally got to the White House and assumed the co-presidency, she veered sharply back to the left on a whole range of issues, especially Hillarycare.

The same pattern will repeat itself should Hillary be elected president. Hillary has never abandoned her early leftist inclinations. She has merely done her best to suppress the evidence of her political past, from barring public access to her thesis on Alinsky during her time in the White House, to papering over the significance of her internship at Treuhaft, Walker, and Bernstein, to pretending that she turned away from Alinsky after her undergraduate years, when in fact she brought his methods and outlook into the heart of her political work. Her strategic preference for polarization and targeting enemies is well documented from her time in the White House, even, or especially, by sympathetic writers such as Bernstein. 


Hillary is fortunate in having a more open and straightforward champion of the Left like Elizabeth Warren as a foil. Yet far less separates the two of them than meets the eye. Not only have Hillary’s deepest sympathies always been on the left, but the newly idealized Democratic party is going to pressure a President Hillary Clinton to be what she has always wanted to be.

With Obamacare and much else besides, the legal and bureaucratic groundwork has already been laid for a leftist transformation of America. It is naïve to believe that Hillary would roll any of this back. On the contrary, as president she would finish the job Obama started. A Hillary presidency is destined to be an Obama third term!!! 

HILLARY, AN OBAMA THIRD TERM? TWO ALINSKYITE PRESIDENTS IN A ROW? 

 HILLARY SAID IT BEST: “THE RESULT WOULD BE A SOCIAL REVOLUTION.”

NOW WITH CRUZ AND KASICH BEING EXPOSED FOR THEIR LEFT OF LEFT AGENDA’S ON IMMIGRATION AND OPEN BORDERS, AND FOLLOWING HILLARY IN HER LOFTY OBAMA GOALS OF ALINSKY’S BRINGING DOWN AMERICA FROM WITHIN!!…..IT'S TIME FOR THE AMERICAN VOTER TO TAKE THAT LEAP OF FAITH LIKE OUR FOREFATHERS DID WHEN MAKING THEIR WAY TO THE SHORES OF THAT PROMISED  LAND CALLED AMERICA, AND TO FREEDOM!..TRUMP MIGHT NOT BE THE PERFECT CANDIDATE, BUT WITH NO POLITICAL STRINGS ATTACHED, AND WITH HIS ABILITIES AT 69 YEARS OLD OF BEING ABLE TO DELEGATE RESPONSIBILITY WHICH MADE HIM A BILLIONAIRE, AND FUNDING HIS DREAM OF 'MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN,' IS ALL I NEED TO KNOW, AND SHOULD BE GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU, AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICA!!!!

CHECK BACK IN TOMORROW FOR AN UP TO DATE NEW VERSION OF 'WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING'

Jonathan E P Moore ‘While You Were Sleeping’

THE NEXT ‘While You Were Sleeping’

Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.