Thursday, January 26, 2017

GEORGE WASHINGTON SHOWED US HOW MEXICO IS GOING TO PAY FOR THE WALL!

By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and Friends of America!
GEORGE WASHINGTON SHOWED US HOW MEXICO IS GOING TO PAY FOR THE WALL!
I don’t think the majority of Americans understand investing and financing, but to a lot of Americans that’s not their main responsibility and chosen path in life. Working hard, paying the bills, putting food on the table, and doing their best to provide, and max out every opportunity to aid and assist their children to succeed in life, is what the main focus is, and should be. 
Once in a while Americans get a little taste of how finances works, and if you ever bought a car, bought a house, paid for your children’s college, and had a credit card, you are dabbling in the world of finance. So, what’s my point, and where am I going with this you’re probably asking yourself, and what does George Washington have to do with anything, let alone the wall being built?
In 2006, These Democrats Still in Office Voted to Build a Wall, but I guess what’s out of sight, thanks to ‘Agenda Journalism,’ is out of mind!
Democrats are already grumbling about Donald Trump’s proposed border wall though Barack Obama and other leaders in their party, but not so long ago they all voted for George W. Bush’s proposal to build a major wall on the border with Mexico.
Bush signed the proposal into law in 2006 after it was passed by huge bipartisan majorities in the House and Senate.
The law ordered the Department of Homeland Security to construct about 700 miles of fencing along the southern border, and authorized the addition of lights and cameras and sensors to enhance security. The law explicitly required the wall to be constructed of “at least two layers of reinforced fencing.”
Two-thirds of the Republican-led House approved the bill, including 64 Democrats, and 80 of 100 senators approved the bill in the Senate.
Then-Sens. Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Hillary Clinton were among the 26 Democrats who approved the bill. Supporters also included Sen. Chuck Schumer, who is set to take over leadership of the Senate for Democrats in 2016.
Other Democrats in the Senate who voted for the wall in 2006 are Sens. Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Sherrod Brown (Ohio—then in the House), Tom Carper (Del.), Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), Barbara Mikulski (Md.), Bill Nelson (Fla.), Debbie Stabenow (Mich.), and Ron Wyden (Ore.).
There are also a number of Democrat representatives still in the House who voted for the bill: Sanford Bishop (Ga.), Corrine Brown (Fla.), Michael Capuano (Mass.), Jim Cooper (Tenn.), Jim Costa (Calif.), Peter DeFazio (Ore.), Steve Israel (N.Y.), Ron Kind (Wis.), Daniel Lipinski (Ill.), Stephen Lynch (Mass.), Carolyn Maloney (N.Y.), Bill Pascrell Jr. (N.J.), Collin Peterson (Minn.), C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger (Md.), Tim Ryan (Ohio), and Adam Smith (Wash.).
Former Democrat Rep. Barney Frank and now-disgraced former Democrat Rep. Anthony Weiner also voted for the bill.
Bush signed the bill into law Oct. 26, 2006. “This bill will help protect the American people,” he said. “This bill will make our borders more secure.” ~~By Rachel Stoltzfoos, a Friend of America!
But nearly a decade later, DHS has built only 35.6 miles of the double-layered fencing. That’s because a ‘Democrat-controlled’ Congress later amended the law to allow DHS officials to build whatever sort of barrier they deemed appropriate! Doesn’t this remind you how monies, like the funded by the American people Social Security piggy bank was robbed of some 5 Trillion dollars, and left us a vault I.O.U’. s? ~~
Barack Obama, in 2009 came up with ‘The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act’ aimed to create or save about 3.5 million jobs, many of which will come from transportation, environmental, broadband and other infrastructure projects. But despite the president's early efforts to win bipartisan support for the plan, it failed to win the backing of a single House Republican, and only three moderate Republicans voted for it in the Senate.
The measure won approval in the Senate by a vote of 60-38. Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown cast the decisive vote after flying back to Washington aboard a government plane from his home state of Ohio, where he was mourning his mother's death. GOP Sen. John McCain of Arizona, Obama's former rival for the White House, decried what he saw as the lack of bipartisanship in the legislation.
"We want to work together with the other side," McCain said. "And this is not the example that I think the American people want us to exercise."
The House passed the measure earlier Friday on a 246-183 vote with no Republican support. Seven Democrats also voted against the package, and one Democrat voted present.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said the bill is an investment in the nation's success. "By investing in new jobs, in science and innovation, in energy, in education ... we are investing in the American people, which is the best guarantee of the success of our nation," she said.
But not everyone agreed. "This legislation falls woefully short," said House GOP Leader John Boehner of Ohio. "With a price tag of more than $1 trillion when you factor in interest, it costs every family almost $10,000 in added debt. This is an act of generational theft that our children and grandchildren will be paying for far into the future."
The Congressional Budget Office said the compromise package would cost $787.2 billion, slightly less than the $789 billion lawmakers had earlier estimated.
White House and congressional negotiators worked quickly to reach a compromise on competing versions of the legislation, putting them on track to meet Obama's goal of signing the bill into law by Presidents Day. 
Speaking to a group of business leaders at the White House, Obama said the economic downturn has brought opportunities, as well as hardships.
"We have a once-in-a-generation chance to act boldly and turn adversity into opportunity, and to use this crisis as a chance to transform this economy for the 21st century," Obama said.
Obama said support from the business community and organized labor paved the way for the bill's quick passage. He has spent much of the week building support for the stimulus plan, a component of his strategy for lifting the country out of recession.
"Once Congress passes this plan and I sign it into law, a new wave of innovation, activity and construction will be unleashed all across America," Obama told a crowd in East Peoria, Ill., where he visited a Caterpillar equipment plant on Thursday. "Rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, repairing our dangerous dams and levees so we don't face another Katrina — think about all the work out there to be done — and Caterpillar will be selling the equipment that does the work."
The legislation, more than 1,000 pages long, was posted on the House Rules Committee Web site late Thursday. About 65 percent of the money usages measure goes toward spending, while about 35 percent goes toward tax cuts, including:
• $27.5 billion for highway projects
• $340 million for watershed and flood-prevention operations and watershed rehabilitation
• $2.5 billion for distance learning, telemedicine and broadband programs
• $150 million for economic development assistance programs
• $4.7 billion for a broadband technology opportunities program
• $6 billion for local clean water initiatives
• $21 billion to aid laid-off workers with employer-provided health insurance through COBRA
• $53.6 billion to help states deal with budget deficits
• $36.2 billion for energy spending
• $19.9 billion for aid to poor families
• a tax credit of up to $400 for low- and middle-income individuals and $800 for families
• a one-time payment of $250 to recipients of Social Security and government disability
Meanwhile, Obama economics adviser Lawrence Summers warned the public against thinking the plan would be a quick fix for the nation's ailing economy.
"We're not promising some silver bullet for the economy," Summers said in an interview Friday on NBC. "Indeed, what really is very important about President Obama's approach is his commitment to working this through step by step in its many aspects." ~~By Deborah Tedford, a Friend of America!
SO, WHAT HAPPENED TO THOSE BIG BUCKS THAT WERE SPENT BY A CLUELESS NON-BUSINESSMAN IDEOLOGUE WHO DIDN’T HAVE A CLUE WHAT IT TOOK TO BUILD AMERICA’S ECONOMY?
The 10 Most Outrageous Stimulus Projects!
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Commonly known as the stimulus, the nearly $1 trillion law was hailed as an opportunity to bring America into the “21st century.”
Just two years after the bill was signed into law, President Barack Obama admitted, “shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected.” While the law failed to create jobs as promised, it has provided plenty of examples of waste, fraud, and abuse.
Five years and at least $816.3 billion later, here are 10 ways the government wasted taxpayer money. (Countdown)
10) $1.3 Million for Stimulus Highway Signs
9) $152K to Get Lesbians Ready for ‘Adoptive Parenthood’
8) $600,000 to Plant Trees in Wealthy Neighborhoods
7) $384,949 Study of Duck Penises
6) $1.2 Million Study of Erectile Dysfunction in Overweight Men
5) $100,000 Anti-Capitalist Puppet Shows
4) $389,357 for College Students to Keep a Diary of Their Marijuana and Malt Liquor Use
3) $3.4 Million Turtle Tunnel
2) $8,408 Study to See if Mice Get Drunk
1) $535 Million on Solyndra
Just two years after receiving $535 million from the stimulus, Solyndra filed for bankruptcy. The company was the first to receive a federal loan guarantee from the stimulus. Solyndra’s biggest investor, George Kaiser, was a bundler for the Obama campaign.
At least four other companies received stimulus money only to later file for bankruptcy, including Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Co., which received $10 million to increase employment, and Evergreen Solar Inc., which received $5.3 million to install 11,000 photovoltaic panels.
LET’S LOOK AT THE OTHER HALF OF THE INSIDER EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER’S FINANCIAL DEALINGS!
CGI Federal, which secured a $678 million ‘no-bid’ contract to build the Obamacare exchange web portal, has come under increased scrutiny for ties between senior executives and the Obama administration following the disastrous rollout of the healthcare website.
Toni Townes-Whitley, a senior vice president at CGI Federal, is a Princeton classmate of First Lady Michelle Obama, the Daily Caller reported. In addition to being college classmates, both Obama and Townes-Whitley are members of the Association of Black Princeton Alumni.
The Examiner reported that visitor logs show that "CGI Federal President Donna Ryan visited the White House six times prior to her company being selected to do the IT design work behind the high-profile website."
 "Two of the meetings attended by CGI executives were with Vivek Kundra, Obama's chief information officer. Kundra was a key figure in Obama administration information technology initiatives across the government," the paper reported.
In addition to the $88 million contract awarded to CGI Federal for the health-insurance exchange website, the company has received a total of $422 million in contracts related to Obamacare since the legislation was signed into law, according to Bloomberg News.
 According to Federal Election Commission Records, Toni Townes-Whitley gave $500 in 2011 and 2012 to Obama's reelection, and another $1,000 to the Obama Victory Fund.
 Close access to the White House was also enjoyed by other senior CGI officials, reports The Washington Examiner.
The Examiner reported that visitor logs show that "CGI Federal President Donna Ryan visited the White House six times prior to her company being selected to do the IT design work behind the high-profile website."
 "Two of the meetings attended by CGI executives were with Vivek Kundra, Obama's chief information officer. Kundra was a key figure in Obama administration information technology initiatives across the government," the paper reported.
In addition to the $88 million contract awarded to CGI Federal for the health-insurance exchange website, the company has received a total of $422 million in contracts related to Obamacare since the legislation was signed into law, according to Bloomberg News.
Fox News reported a number of occasions in which the company had failed to meet deadlines or experienced botched launches similar to that seen with the launch of healthcare.gov.
 "In projects stretching from Canada to Hawaii, parent company CGI Group and its subsidiaries ran into complaints about its performance," Fox reported.
Despite the problems with other projects, the company has been awarded numerous government contracts from other federal departments.
In April, CGI Federal was awarded a five-year contract worth a total of $11 billion from the Department of Homeland Security and the Coast Guard for Technical, Acquisition and Business Support Services (TABSS), according to Washington Executive magazine.
CGI Federal is also assisting the Department of Housing and Urban Development in the distributing of $1.7 billion relief aid for Hurricane Sandy victims, the Daily Caller reported.
In 2012, the company also won contracts worth $15 million with the Environmental Protection Agency and $900 million contract with the U.S. Agency for International Development to design and operate its IT security operations. ~~By Jennifer G. Hickey, a Friend of America!
GEORGE WASHINGTON, AND THEN MARTHA WASHINGTON WILL HELP EXPLAIN HOW THE ‘WALL’ WILL BE PAID BY MEXICO!
Workers built the six-lane George Washington Bridge in sections. They carried the pieces to the construction site by rail, then hauled them into the river by boat, then hoisted them into place by crane. Though the bridge was gigantic, engineer Othmar Amman had found a way to make it look light and airy: in place of vertical trusses, he used horizontal plate girders in the roadway to keep the bridge Steady. Amman used such strong steel that these plate girders could be relatively thin and as a result, the bridge deck was only 12 feet deep. From a distance, it looked as flimsy as a magic carpet. Meanwhile, thanks to Amman’s sophisticated suspension system, that magic carpet seemed to be floating: The bridge hung from cables made of steel wires–107,000 miles and 28,100 tons of steel wires, to be exact–that were much more delicate-looking than anything anyone had ever seen.
The bridge opened to traffic on October 25, 1931. One year later, it had carried 5 million cars from New York to New Jersey and back again. In 1946, engineers added two lanes to the bridge. In 1958, city officials decided to increase its capacity by 75 percent by adding a six-lane lower level. This deck (the New York Times called it “a masterpiece of traffic engineering,” while other, more waggish observers referred to it as the “Martha Washington”) opened in August 1962.
Today, the George Washington Bridge is one of the world’s busiest bridges. In 2008, it carried some 105,894,000 vehicles.
SO, HOW IS MEXICO PAYING FOR THE WALL?
To finance the George Washington Bridge, the states of New York and New Jersey each advanced $5 million and $50 million in bonds were issued.
'Tolls' were set to pay off the bonds, which would mature serially starting in 1953. It was assumed after paying off the bond holders, the tolls would eventually be reduced or even eliminated. (Hah! Good luck with that Mexico!)
The original toll for passenger automobiles was 50 cents each way. Motorcycles and bicycles were charged 25 cents, and trucks were charged up to one dollar depending upon their weight. A simple bus ride from one end of the bridge to the other cost a dime.
Hmmm…
With the current threat of Facebook's feckless ability to be bipartisan, feel free to befriend me at 'Jonathan E P Moore' to get direct and instant access, or follow 'While You Were Sleeping' at www.whileyouweredozing.blogspot.com Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Google Plus, and PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
🚂🇺������💨

Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

TO THE DISMAY OF HILLARY SUPPORTERS, 'AGENDA JOURNALISTS,' AND LIBERALS, TRUMP IS RIGHT!



By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and friends of America!
TO THE DISMAY OF HILLARY SUPPORTERS, 'AGENDA JOURNALISTS,' AND LIBERALS, TRUMP IS RIGHT!

If there is one thing these progressive politicians and their followers don’t want, it’s a national voter ID Laws! If it weren’t for Hillary’s feckless campaigning in states where hard workers are considered unimportant to the path of her expected coronation, and the silent majority coming to the rescue, we might all be living in the Socialists States of America today!


I keep hearing the ‘Agenda Journalists’ yelling "Where’s the Beef" when Trump declares his popular vote victory was short circuited by the illegal voting of ‘just some’ of the up to 20-30 Million illegals that the Media isn’t reporting on! The 11-13 million number they’ve been using for years makes Trump’s assertions seem not probable, but when you know about the 20-30, it’s more than reasonable. If you just used a little common sense and watched Barack Obama encourage unvetted illegal immigrants and refugees to vote without any repercussions during election day, then you have to know somethings going on and asking yourself, "What’s up with that!"


Why did Obama open the borders, override our immigration laws, not bother to ‘vet’ illegal immigrants and refugees, and allow other than our Constitutional blueprint for our constitutional republic to take hold in, and survive using their own separate laws, and at the same time demonizing Christianity and its symbols, when the same ideology has been eliminating Christians by the millions overseas?


The White House has ignored the fact that back in 1952 and still today, Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration!



So, let’s get back to the topic at hand, voter fraud, and why voter ID should be on Trump’s top ten issues needed to protect America’s sovereignty moving in to the future! What reason would Obama be spending a Trillion Dollars of taxpayers’ money a year supporting unvetted illegal immigrants and refugees if it weren’t for their vote? Now let’s look at why our election process is ripe for Obama’s Socialist transformation of America game plan:

Although some states require some form of ID before voting, California, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming, and Washington, D.C. all require no identification before voting……This list of states that don’t have any ID required is all you need to know!


I guess you all know about Linda Sarsour, a Muslim-American woman and one of the organizers of Saturday's Women's March in Washington, D.C. is being accused of alleged ties to terrorists.

According to The Daily Caller, Sarsour was recently spotted posing with an accused financier for the terrorist group Hamas at a large Muslim convention in Chicago.

It is unclear if the two are related even though they have the same last name.

Linda Sarsour has acknowledged in past interviews that she has cousins serving time in Israel due to their work for Hamas....Move on, nothing new here......

THE ‘PAID TO REPORT’ MEDIA WITH ITS ‘AGENDA JOURNALISTS’ ARE PROTECTING THE TRUTH ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF VOTER FRAUD BEING THE ‘REAL DEAL!’

Three million votes in the U.S. presidential election were cast by illegal aliens, per Greg Phillips of the VoteFraud.org organization.

If true, this would mean that Donald Trump still won the contest despite widespread vote fraud and almost certainly won the popular vote.

"We have verified more than three million votes cast by non-citizens," tweeted Phillips after reporting that the group had completed an analysis of a database of 180 million voter registrations.

Per current indications, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by around 630,000 votes, although around 7 million ballots remain uncounted.

Virtually all the votes cast by 3 million illegal immigrants are likely to have been for Hillary Clinton, meaning Trump might have won the popular vote when this number is considered.

Vote fraud using ballots cast in the name of dead people and illegal alien voters was a huge concern before the election.

On the morning of the election there were 4 million dead people on U.S. voter registration rolls.

But, in fact, it's almost certain that illegals did vote — and in significant numbers. Whether it was three million or not is another question.

While states control the voter registration process, some states
are so notoriously slipshod in their controls (California, Virginia and New York — all of which have political movements to legalize voting by noncitizens — come to mind) that it would be shocking if many illegals didn't vote. Remember, a low-ball estimate says there are at least 11 million to 12 million illegals in the U.S., but that's based on faulty Census data. More likely estimates put the number at 20 million to 30 million.

What's disappointing is that instead of at least seriously considering Trump's charge, many media report merely parrot leftist talking points and anti-Trump rhetoric by pushing the idea that Republicans and others not of the progressive left who seek to limit voting to citizens only are racist, xenophobic nuts.

But there is evidence to back Trump's claims. A 2014 study in the online Electoral Studies Journal shows that in the 2008 and 2010 elections, illegal immigrant votes were in fact quite high.

"We find that some noncitizens participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes, and congressional elections," wrote Jesse T. Richman, Gulshan A. Chattha, both of Old Dominion University, and David C. Earnest of George Mason University.

More specifically, "Noncitizen votes likely would have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform, but Kennedy's untimely death caused the nuclear option to be used by Harry Reid when the people of Massachusetts didn't elect a Democrat to replace Kennedy, but still, noncitizens voting helped the Obama administration pass other priorities in the 111th Congress."

Specifically, the authors say that illegals may have cast as many as 2.8 million votes in 2008 and 2010. That's a lot of votes. And when you consider the population of illegal inhabitants has only grown since then, it's not unreasonable to suppose that their vote has, too.

Critics note that a Harvard team in 2015 had responded to the study, calling it "biased." But that report included this gem: "Further, the likely percent of noncitizen voters in recent U.S. elections is 0."

Really? That's simply preposterous, frankly, as anyone who has lived in California can attest. Leftist get-out-the-vote groups openly urge noncitizens to vote during election time, and the registration process is notoriously loose. To suggest there is no illegal voting at all is absurd.

What's appalling, as we said, is not the media's skepticism, but its denial. But why? Illegal votes shouldn't be allowed to sway U.S. elections. So why tolerate them?

When the far left began insinuating that the Russians had hacked the election, the media treated the non-supported claims with the utmost of respect. They still do. But not Trump's suggestion that illegals voted, and in large numbers, mainly for Democratic candidates, including Hillary Clinton.

And, yes, Trump is right: Illegal votes may in part explain why Hillary now has a nearly two-million-vote lead in the popular vote, even though she lost convincingly in the Electoral College. A Rasmussen Reports poll earlier this year found that 53% of the Democratic Party
supports letting illegals vote, even though it's against the law. It's pretty clear why.

Yes, there is room for skepticism of any claim that's made. But every vote cast by someone who isn't by law permitted to vote disenfranchises American citizens. The charge should at least be taken seriously.

Meanwhile, we will expect the media to continue to give its fawning attention to the spurious challenges of nonexistent vote tampering leveled by Hillary Clinton and Jill Stein, on behalf of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party.

While the media savage Trump and his motives, please recall what Hillary said in the debates: that the idea a defeated candidate wouldn't recognize the results of the election was "horrifying." And she has also agreed there is no "actionable evidence" of either hacking or outside interference, despite joining with Stein to seek recounts.

So, what about Clinton's motives?

As for Stein, who barely registered a blip on the 2016 electoral screen, the $5 million or so she has raised to pay for recounts really seems more like a ploy to bail out her failed campaign than a serious attempt at a recount. But the media continue to treat her like a serious political operator — not the far-left kook she is. ~~By 'Help' ?, a Friend of America!

RELATED:

Will Illegal Foreign Voters Steal the Election?

Sorry, But Illegal Aliens Cost the U.S. Plenty!

Democrats Want Illegals to Vote Because They Vote Democrat!

The Electoral College was created for two reasons. The first purpose was to create a buffer between population and the selection of a President. The second as part of the structure of the government that gave extra power to the smaller states.

The first reason that the founders created the Electoral College is hard to understand today. The founding fathers were afraid of direct election to the Presidency. They feared a tyrant could manipulate public opinion and come to power.

Hamilton and the other founders believed that the electors would be able to ensure that only a qualified person becomes President. They believed that with the Electoral College no one would be able to manipulate the citizenry. It would act as check on an electorate that might be duped. Hamilton and the other founders did not trust the population to make the right choice. The founders also believed that the Electoral College had the advantage of being a group that met only once and thus could not be manipulated over time by foreign governments or others.

The electoral college is also part of compromises made at the convention to satisfy the small states. Under the system of the Electoral College each state had the same number of electoral votes as they have representative in Congress, thus no state could have less than 3. The result of this system is that in this election the state of Wyoming cast about 210,000 votes, and thus each elector represented 70,000 votes, while in California approximately 9,700,000 votes were cast for 54 votes, thus representing 179,000 votes per electorate. Obviously, this creates an unfair advantage to voters in the small states whose votes count more than those people living in medium and large states.

One aspect of the electoral system that is not mandated in the constitution is the fact that the winner takes all the votes in the state. Therefore, it makes no difference if you win a state by 50.1% or by 80% of the vote you receive the same number of electoral votes. This can be a recipe for one individual to win some states by large pluralities and lose others by small number of votes, and thus this is an easy scenario for one candidate winning the popular vote while another winning the electoral vote. This winner take all methods used in picking electors has been decided by the states themselves. This trend took place over the course of the 19th century.

While there are clear problems with the Electoral College and there are some advantages to it, changing it is very unlikely. It would take a constitutional amendment ratified by 3/4 of states to change the system. It is hard to imagine the smaller states agreeing. One way of modifying the system s to eliminate the winner take all part of it. The method that the states vote for the electoral college is not mandated by the constitution but is decided by the states. Two states do not use the winner take all system, Maine and Nebraska. It would be difficult but not impossible to get other states to change their systems, unfortunately the party that has the advantage in the state is unlikely to agree to a unilateral change.

Donald Trump was proven right again. Much to the dismay of Hillary supporters, the media, and liberals

Trump Was Right, Recount Discovers Massive Voter Fraud in Detroit!

If you haven’t been paying attention, Hillary used her proxy, Jill Stein, to start multiple recounts. Hillary would use Jill Stein and Jill would get access to Hillary’s heartbroken supporters to use as her personal ATM machine.

And use she did — she has raised close to $7 million from these gullible dupes.

But that dynamic duo was not prepared for what happened in Michigan, one of the states they recounted.

Michigan has a very unique election law. To protect from this exact situation.

There are 3 types of items Michigan tracks. First is the computer votes. Second is the total
number of ballots they ran through the computers. Third is the signature of the voter on the official voter rolls.

If the last 2 – number of ballots and signatures don’t match the votes can’t be recounted.

And therein lies the doom of Hillary’s plan.

Hillary had hoped to make up the 10,000 votes she lost by in Wayne County. Which she won 2-1. This is Detroit and it is rife with fraud and corruption.

So, Hillary liked her chances. Except that she, like a typical liberal, didn’t fully understand the law when she called for a recount. If she did she wouldn’t have dared risk exposing what officials found when they tried to reconcile the numbers before the recount even began.

One-third of precincts in Wayne County, 610 out of 1,680 precincts did not match.

Meaning someone, and it wasn’t Trump, stuffed these ballots with Hillary votes.

In a blatant attempt to steal the election.

Those counties will not be recounted as a result ending Hillary’s attempt.

But in my opinion someone must answer for this massive voter fraud this recount uncovered.

Hillary? Anyone know Trey Gowdy’s cell phone number?

Someone should answer for this assault on democracy.

The Heritage Foundation has compiled a database of hundreds of fraud cases nationwide -- and those only count the people who were caught. Requiring that voters prove that they are who they say they are is common sense. The concept enjoys lopsided support across a wide ideological spectrum. Voter ID laws aren't a silver bullet to stop all fraud, obviously, and elements of some legislation sometimes push too far in ways that deserve scrutiny. But in general, they represent a reasonable and sensible safeguard against illegal voting, and claims of discriminatory and disparate racial impact are overblown. The Left's effective pro-fraud stance is both wildly
unpopular and wrong. This is a worthwhile and winnable political fight to wage -- and if the courts overreach on this front by flouting clear Supreme Court precedent, they should be criticized harshly. Pointing to robed lawyers overturning overwhelmingly-supported voter integrity laws is a fairly straightforward method of illustrating and attacking judicial activism.
With the current threat of Facebook's feckless ability to be bipartisan, feel free to befriend me at 'Jonathan E P Moore' to get direct and instant access, or follow 'While You Were Sleeping' at www.whileyouweredozing.blogspot.com Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Google Plus, and PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
🚂🇺������💨

Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.


Tuesday, January 24, 2017

NOT ONLY DOES AMERICA HAVE TO DEAL WITH ‘AGENDA JOURNALISM,’ BUT THE GRAND DELUSION OF THE PROGRESSIVE LEFT!

By Jonathan E.P. Moore, and Friends of America!
NOT ONLY DOES AMERICA HAVE TO DEAL WITH ‘AGENDA JOURNALISM,’ BUT THE GRAND DELUSION OF THE PROGRESSIVE LEFT!
Chuck-e was irrelevant when he was in New York, and apparently achieved his 'Peter Principle' status and shipped off to Washington DC, and the Senate, to continue his feckless record of leadership. The American people sent Trump to the oval office
to do his job, and Chuck-e took away his tools........for those on the progressive left who don't understand what I'm talking about , TRUMP'S CABINET NOMINEE'S! HELLO! ANYBODY HOME?  
And the beat goes on, and on, and on, and now that Hillary lost, the ‘Paid to Report’ Media doesn’t need to be used to get Hillary elected, but instead using ‘Fake News’ to delegitimize Trump’s Presidency. Don’t get me wrong, they’re still getting paid by the likes of George Soros and other outsiders who are truly the ones effecting our elections, and not the Russians, and as a result, ‘Agenda Journalism’ is slowly being discredited, becoming irrelevant, and very close to becoming another animal that’s being put on the endangered species list!
Part of my parent’s dynamic duo in the morning, especially on Sunday morning, was coffee, and getting the NY Times, and because we lived in Bergen County New Jersey, the Sunday Record! As a 12-year-old, I had my afternoon paper route after school to make a couple extra bucks, and back then making $10 was a lot of money, and that was for a week!
That was in 1964, and the same year Edward R. Murrow warned us that news divisions decided that the news has to make money, has to get ratings, and no longer news—but entertainment. So, if people are bothered by the fact that we seem to be having entertainment as news, it’s because the news divisions decided that money and ratings were more important than reporting.”
For 50 plus years now we’ve been led down that ‘transformational’ yellow brick road, but it never really was exposed until it reared its ugly head through Obama’s Socialist dream that he had for America! We dodged that continuation Hillary bullet after America’s Silent Majority came out of
their caves to show us the errors of our ‘Not paying attention’ lives of liberty and freedom that were the backbone of our existence, and the reason why America became that ‘Shining city on a Hill’ for the world to look up to, strive to be like, and where they all wanted to be.
Now when it came to ‘where they all wanted to be,’ that was easy, and when Obama, with the help of Eric Holder, dismantled and didn’t enforce our immigration laws to open the borders, import and support unvetted illegal immigrants and refugees at the cost to the American taxpayers! Our elected officials on both sides of the aisle were in bed with each other and hid from the American people their treasonous globalist path without getting the ‘will’ of the American people’s permission first! At that point, and knowing that hindsight is 20/20, we are in deep doo-doo!
SUNDAY MORNING ‘TALK SHOWS’
The polls got it wrong when predicting a landslide for Hillary, and claim respectable pollsters made the call, but I believe it more to be a psychological subliminal steering  messaging of being part of a winning team mentality, because everybody wants to be a member of a winning team, and using subliminal steering on who to vote for to feel part of that winning team!
When it comes to ‘Agenda Journalism’ it’s no longer become about the policies of Trump and the mandate of the American people, but today’s media continuing to fight to stay relevant in a venue where they been forced to compete with the supermarket tabloids! There is no room in an America that is already full of burgeoning anti- American tit for tat, he said she said, or half-truths and innuendos for a once relied upon ‘Cry Wolf’ ‘Agenda Journalist’s’ ‘15 minute of fame’ driven reporting!
If the ‘Agenda Journalists’ didn’t notice there’s a new sheriff in town, and he’s an outsider non-politician billionaire who doesn’t have time to shoot the shit, but only do what he does best, and that’s work hard and live up to the promises he made America! Trump who, along with his cabinet nominees, have realized the America Dream and living it, and for someone like Schumer, Pelosi, McConnell, and the long gone from America’s political history except for is anti-filibustering nuclear option contribution, Harry Reid, have always been career politicians. These

head up their ass politicians have never worked in the private sector, never hired, fired, or had to balance the books or cut back to financially survive and navigate through the maze of regulations and tax burden laced government oversight! These same Politicians who never worked a day in their lives outside those ‘political correct’ very high ‘Walls’ don’t seem to have the time to walk among the lower 48 states and the citizens that are represented in them! Trump knows, like his cabinet nominees about the barriers that separate our elected official from the reality of being an American citizen, and that’s because they have been rubbing elbows and being accepted by those elites for decades. The problems with government, until Trump and his make America great again battle cry, and first before any thing else, is their own perceived world of reality, which has everything to do with their inability to know what’s best for the American people, and how to create jobs.
We have ‘Agenda Journalists’ driving home one talking point soundbite, and riding it until the truth catches up to it when their ‘Fake’ news item is exposed. Then we have to contend with the ‘heard’ of mimics doubling down to get any scrap that will help extend their relevance and keeping them carrying on until the next talking points soundbite comes along. My point is illustrated in this clip when Chuck Todd drives home his only ‘talking point soundbite’ about the purpose of bringing up the crowd size of the Trump’s inauguration, while Kellyanne scores point after point of relative and important facts, and I don’t mean ‘alternate facts’ that are being doubled down on by the ‘Paid to Report’ Media!
America’s politicians need to make amends to our founding fathers, our constitutional republic, the ‘Will’ of the American people, and to our children and our children’s children for jeopardizing the future of this exceptional country! ~~
THE GRAND DELUSION OF THE PROGRESSIVE LEFT!
I love two genres of music, classical and classic rock. One of my favorite classic rock bands is the group Styx and one of my favorite songs of theirs is “Grand Illusion”. However, in the case of what we have seen post the 2016 presidential election through the inauguration of President Donald Trump, it appears the progressive socialist left is operating under a grand delusion.
In 2009, the progressive left embarked upon an ideological agenda evidencing a serious delusion and disconnection with America. Instead of focusing on two simple issues, economic
growth and national security, Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and their acolytes engaged a direction for America that was not rooted in sound policy, but their interpretation of “fairness”.
The first case of delusion was to try and make the American people believe that Keynesian economic policy, tax and spend, was still viable. First thing out of the gate was a massive $1 trillion stimulus package that was centered upon what was termed “shovel ready jobs”. It was a matter of huge Embarrassment when Obama sat on a stage with his economic council stating, “I guess shovel ready was not exactly ready”. The fact that Obama did so with a laugh and smirk was a slap in the face of the American taxpayer.
Obama in his eight years focused more on wealth redistribution, you know, we all do better when we “spread the wealth around”. Furthermore, Obama made the seminal statement which presented a window into the mindset of the progressive left when he stated, “if you own a business, you didn’t build that”. There could be no more disrespectful, delusional, assertion directed towards the hard working American and their indomitable entrepreneurial spirit. Obama and his disciples of economic disaster failed to grasp the concept that economic growth emanates not from Washington DC, but rather from the policies that unleash American investment, ingenuity, and innovation…along with production and manufacturing.
Due to his far left intransigent ideology, Obama sought not to get Americans back to work. His design was to expand the welfare nanny state of government dependency. The result of this
delusion was our national debt going from $10.67T to $20T. We have exploded our food stamp and poverty rolls, and we have suffered the lowest workforce participation rate in some 40 years.
Second, Obama and the left sought to use effective free market policy to improve the healthcare situation in America. Instead, they believed there was a mandate to do what they had always wanted, push a government-driven healthcare system. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act a.k.a “Obamacare” was nothing more than a domestic wealth redistribution scheme, with some twenty new taxes. It spanned to gamut from increases in capital gains and dividends taxes to creation of an individual and employer mandate tax along with medical device and taxes on health savings accounts.
Obama said that there would be on average $2500 of savings and that you would be able to keep your doctor and insurance. The latter was awarded by PolitiFact as the “Lie of the Year”, 2013, funny, the year after Obama’s reelection…and he promised Vladimir Putin more flexibility. The American people in October 2016 did not see savings, they saw massive increases in their health insurance premiums, the result of the delusion of redistribution of healthcare. Obamacare turned out to be nothing more than a huge expansion of Medicaid. It proved unaffordable and did not
provide protection for patients, but a segment of people got something for free. A rational policy approach would have meant Obama and his team focused on the real issue, but they overreached. And as Nancy Pelosi said, “we have to pass the bill, in order to find out what was in it”, a true example of delusion.
Third, Obama departed the White House trying to have us buy into his delusion by stating that on his watch there had not been a terrorist organization attack. He left still embracing the line that Ft. Hood was the result of “workplace violence”, and he commuted the sentence of one who had leaked over 700,000 classified documents – where some had died as a result of HIS nefarious actions.
Obama and the left could never articulate that the non-state, non-uniform unlawful enemy combatants we face on the 21st-century battlefield are Islamic terrorists and jihadists. Obama was more interested in freeing them under the delusion that their being detained in GITMO was an impetus of their hate and a recruiting tool. Instances of Islamic terrorist attacks on our soil were attributed to the lawful ownership of guns by law-abiding Americans. And the left, aided by the complicit liberal progressive media, tried to castigate those who understood this enemy as “Islamophobes” – a moniker created by an Islamic organization with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.
I could go on about other critical issues, like a lack of focus on our border security leading to deaths of Americans like Kate Steinle.
The overarching issue is that we are watching the progressive left continue to wrap themselves in their own delusion. This past weekend there were marches focused on women’s rights. Where were those voices when Christian and Yazidi girls were being
raped and sold as sex slaves by ISIS – that group Obama called the JV team, which was not Islamic. If this is about misogyny, where were those voices reference Bill Clinton regularly being welcomed as an “elder statesman” of the Democrat party?
More violence, threats, intimidation, rantings, protests, denigrating, disparaging, and demeaning language from the left will not win folks over to their cause. It will only further distance them from the America that has rejected and repudiated them, the electoral losses of the past eight years is evidence.
The delusion of the progressive left is that they are not conducting a self-analysis or assessment. Their way did not advance economic growth or national security. Albert Einstein said, “The definition of insanity is to continue to do the same thing, and expect different results”. Einstein’s definition certainly befits the grand delusion of the progressive left. ~~By Allen West, a Friend of America!
"I thought I would have the time and intended to continue on with a part 2, and 3 of Trump’s inaugural address, but with the day to day opportunities to delve into something new is more appealing to me…. So, TRUMP’S WORDS MATTER, BUT NPR, LIKE MANY OTHER 'AGENDA JOURNALISTS,' ARE NOT ON THE SAME PAGE (PART2) Will be short circuited, but here’s the article I was counter pointing, and Please feel free to fill in your counter points on your own."
SOME BACKGROUND ON NPR (NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO):
Nearly 30 years ago, during one of its periodic attempts to free itself from the federal dole—an arrangement dating back to NPR’s inception during the Great Society—NPR had nearly gone bankrupt. Its member stations had bailed it out, but the price they exacted was high: from the beginning, those stations—a few large, most small or infinitesimal—had always effectively
controlled the NPR board, which controls NPR. But now they got their money directly from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting rather than through NPR, giving them even more leverage. Only these 268 member stations can change the current structure, and they aren’t likely to vote to diminish their own power anytime soon. So what has become one of the most powerful media entities in the world isn’t run by its own journalists, or by journalists at all, but by station managers from places like Portland, Oregon; Charlotte, North Carolina; Concord, New Hampshire; and Carbondale, Illinois. Those stations are in turn largely funded by political appointees at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, an entity which exists only to dole out federal dollars. It’s supposed to be a firewall against political interference, but concerned for its own survival—if those federal dollars disappear, it does, too—it’s become more of a levee, prone to crumble when the slightest trickle of right-wing criticism starts flowing its way.
Though NPR is surprisingly unable (or unwilling) to give a precise number, the best guess is that roughly 10 percent of NPR’s revenue comes—either directly or indirectly—from the Feds. The remainder arrives courtesy of—well, every NPR listener knows
that voice, sometimes chipper, sometimes officious, shoe-horned into every idle moment of the broadcast day: “Support from NPR comes from . . . ,” followed by a litany of private donors, foundations, corporations, and family trusts. But local stations depend on the C.P.B.–mostly for 10 to 15 percent, but in some instances for as much as 60 percent, of their budgets.
Click here >  WANT-A-BEE MAINSTREAM DJ'S, NPR KNOWS WHERE THERE BREAD IS BUTTERED!
With the current threat of Facebook's feckless ability to be bipartisan, feel free to befriend me at 'Jonathan E P Moore' to get direct and instant access, or follow 'While You Were Sleeping' at www.whileyouweredozing.blogspot.com Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Google Plus, and PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
🚂🇺������💨

Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.